Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness
This commit includes the following:
Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)
Why:
In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.
Is this safe?
AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
This endpoint shows total services, connect service instances and
billable service instances in the local datacenter or globally. Billable
instances = total service instances - connect services - consul server instances.
* Stub Config Entries for Consul Native API Gateway (#15644)
* Add empty InlineCertificate struct and protobuf
* apigateway stubs
* Stub HTTPRoute in api pkg
* Stub HTTPRoute in structs pkg
* Simplify api.APIGatewayConfigEntry to be consistent w/ other entries
* Update makeConfigEntry switch, add docstring for HTTPRouteConfigEntry
* Add TCPRoute to MakeConfigEntry, return unique Kind
* Stub BoundAPIGatewayConfigEntry in agent
* Add RaftIndex to APIGatewayConfigEntry stub
* Add new config entry kinds to validation allow-list
* Add RaftIndex to other added config entry stubs
* Update usage metrics assertions to include new cfg entries
* Add Meta and acl.EnterpriseMeta to all new ConfigEntry types
* Remove unnecessary Services field from added config entry types
* Implement GetMeta(), GetEnterpriseMeta() for added config entry types
* Add meta field to proto, name consistently w/ existing config entries
* Format config_entry.proto
* Add initial implementation of CanRead + CanWrite for new config entry types
* Add unit tests for decoding of new config entry types
* Add unit tests for parsing of new config entry types
* Add unit tests for API Gateway config entry ACLs
* Return typed PermissionDeniedError on BoundAPIGateway CanWrite
* Add unit tests for added config entry ACLs
* Add BoundAPIGateway type to AllConfigEntryKinds
* Return proper kind from BoundAPIGateway
* Add docstrings for new config entry types
* Add missing config entry kinds to proto def
* Update usagemetrics_oss_test.go
* Use utility func for returning PermissionDeniedError
* EventPublisher subscriptions for Consul Native API Gateway (#15757)
* Create new event topics in subscribe proto
* Add tests for PBSubscribe func
* Make configs singular, add all configs to PBToStreamSubscribeRequest
* Add snapshot methods
* Add config_entry_events tests
* Add config entry kind to topic for new configs
* Add unit tests for snapshot methods
* Start adding integration test
* Test using the new controller code
* Update agent/consul/state/config_entry_events.go
* Check value of error
* Add controller stubs for API Gateway (#15837)
* update initial stub implementation
* move files, clean up mutex references
* Remove embed, use idiomatic names for constructors
* Remove stray file introduced in merge
* Add APIGateway validation (#15847)
* Add APIGateway validation
* Add additional validations
* Add cert ref validation
* Add protobuf definitions
* Fix up field types
* Add API structs
* Move struct fields around a bit
* APIGateway InlineCertificate validation (#15856)
* Add APIGateway validation
* Add additional validations
* Add protobuf definitions
* Tabs to spaces
* Add API structs
* Move struct fields around a bit
* Add validation for InlineCertificate
* Fix ACL test
* APIGateway BoundAPIGateway validation (#15858)
* Add APIGateway validation
* Add additional validations
* Add cert ref validation
* Add protobuf definitions
* Fix up field types
* Add API structs
* Move struct fields around a bit
* Add validation for BoundAPIGateway
* APIGateway TCPRoute validation (#15855)
* Add APIGateway validation
* Add additional validations
* Add cert ref validation
* Add protobuf definitions
* Fix up field types
* Add API structs
* Add TCPRoute normalization and validation
* Add forgotten Status
* Add some more field docs in api package
* Fix test
* Format imports
* Rename snapshot test variable names
* Add plumbing for Native API GW Subscriptions (#16003)
Co-authored-by: Sarah Alsmiller <sarah.alsmiller@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Coleman <nathan.coleman@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: sarahalsmiller <100602640+sarahalsmiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Stucki <andrew.stucki@hashicorp.com>
Existing config entries prefixed by service- are specific to individual
services. Since this config entry applies to partitions it is being
renamed.
Additionally, the Partition label was changed to Name because using
Partition at the top-level and in the enterprise meta was leading to the
enterprise meta partition being dropped by msgpack.
This PR adds cluster members to the metrics API. The number of members per
segment are reported as well as the total number of members.
Tested by running a multi-node cluster locally and ensuring the numbers were
correct. Also added unit test coverage to add the new expected gauges to
existing test cases.
Previously, we would emit service usage metrics both with and without a
namespace label attached. This is problematic in the case when you want
to aggregate metrics together, i.e. "sum(consul.state.services)". This
would cause services to be counted twice in that aggregate, once via the
metric emitted with a namespace label, and once in the metric emited
without any namespace label.
Using the newly provided state store methods, we periodically emit usage
metrics from the servers.
We decided to emit these metrics from all servers, not just the leader,
because that means we do not have to care about leader election flapping
causing metrics turbulence, and it seems reasonable for each server to
emit its own view of the state, even if they should always converge
rapidly.
Matt Keeler