Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ronald dd0e8eec14
copyright headers for agent folder (#16704)
* copyright headers for agent folder

* Ignore test data files

* fix proto files and remove headers in agent/uiserver folder

* ignore deep-copy files
2023-03-28 14:39:22 -04:00
Matt Keeler f3c80c4eef
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness

This commit includes the following:

Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)

Why:

In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.

Is this safe?

AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 16:14:46 -05:00
freddygv 6d368b5eed Update peering state and RPC for deferred deletion
When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all
imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of
data at once could overload Consul.

Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that:

1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is
   marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field.

2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for
   deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources
   before deleting the peering itself.

This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service
to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a
PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings
marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the
deferred deletion leader routine.
2022-06-13 12:10:32 -06:00