When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all
imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of
data at once could overload Consul.
Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that:
1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is
marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field.
2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for
deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources
before deleting the peering itself.
This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service
to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a
PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings
marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the
deferred deletion leader routine.
Previously, imported data would never be deleted. As
nodes/services/checks were registered and deregistered, resources
deleted from the exporting cluster would accumulate in the imported
cluster.
This commit makes updates to replication so that whenever an update is
received for a service name we reconcile what was present in the catalog
against what was received.
This handleUpdateService method can handle both updates and deletions.
Require use of mesh gateways in order for service mesh data plane
traffic to flow between peers.
This also adds plumbing for envoy integration tests involving peers, and
one starter peering test.
There are a handful of changes in this commit:
* When querying trust bundles for a service we need to be able to
specify the namespace of the service.
* The endpoint needs to track the index because the cache watches use
it.
* Extracted bulk of the endpoint's logic to a state store function
so that index tracking could be tested more easily.
* Removed check for service existence, deferring that sort of work to ACL authz
* Added the cache type
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Freddy <freddygv@users.noreply.github.com>
The importing peer will need to know what SNI and SPIFFE name
corresponds to each exported service. Additionally it will need to know
at a high level the protocol in use (L4/L7) to generate the appropriate
connection pool and local metrics.
For replicated connect synthetic entities we edit the `Connect{}` part
of a `NodeService` to have a new section:
{
"PeerMeta": {
"SNI": [
"web.default.default.owt.external.183150d5-1033-3672-c426-c29205a576b8.consul"
],
"SpiffeID": [
"spiffe://183150d5-1033-3672-c426-c29205a576b8.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/web"
],
"Protocol": "tcp"
}
}
This data is then replicated and saved as-is at the importing side. Both
SNI and SpiffeID are slices for now until I can be sure we don't need
them for how mesh gateways will ultimately work.
Treat each exported service as a "discovery chain" and replicate one
synthetic CheckServiceNode for each chain and remote mesh gateway.
The health will be a flattened generated check of the checks for that
mesh gateway node.
freddygv