Follow up to https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/pull/10737#discussion_r682147950
Renames all variables for acl.Authorizer to use `authz`. Previously some
places used `rule` which I believe was an old name carried over from the
legacy ACL system.
A couple places also used authorizer.
This commit also removes another couple of authorizer nil checks that
are no longer necessary.
These functions are moved to the one place they are called to improve code locality.
They are being moved out of agent/consul/acl.go in preparation for moving
ACLResolver to an acl package.
Follow up to: https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/pull/10738#discussion_r680190210
Previously we were passing an Authorizer that would always allow the
operation, then later checking the authorization using vetServiceTxnOp.
On the surface this seemed strange, but I think it was actually masking
a bug as well. Over time `servicePreApply` was changed to add additional
authorization for `service.Proxy.DestinationServiceName`, but because
we were passing a nil Authorizer, that authorization was not handled on
the txn_endpoint.
`TxnServiceOp.FillAuthzContext` has some special handling in enterprise,
so we need to make sure to continue to use that from the Txn endpoint.
This commit removes the `vetServiceTxnOp` function, and passes in the
`FillAuthzContext` function so that `servicePreApply` can be used by
both the catalog and txn endpoints. This should be much less error prone
and prevent bugs like this in the future.
Previously we were inconsistently checking the response for errors. This
PR moves the response-is-error check into raftApply, so that all callers
can look at only the error response, instead of having to know that
errors could come from two places.
This should expose a few more errors that were previously hidden because
in some calls to raftApply we were ignoring the response return value.
Also handle errors more consistently. In some cases we would log the
error before returning it. This can be very confusing because it can
result in the same error being logged multiple times. Instead return
a wrapped error.
* Updates to the Txn API for namespaces
* Update agent/consul/txn_endpoint.go
Co-Authored-By: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <public@richardboyer.net>
This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week.
Description
At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers.
On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though.
Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though.
All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management.
Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are:
A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system.
A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system.
The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode.
So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
Dan Upton