Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris S. Kim 0910c41d95
Revise possible states for a peering. (#13661)
These changes are primarily for Consul's UI, where we want to be more
specific about the state a peering is in.

- The "initial" state was renamed to pending, and no longer applies to
  peerings being established from a peering token.

- Upon request to establish a peering from a peering token, peerings
  will be set as "establishing". This will help distinguish between the
  two roles: the cluster that generates the peering token and the
  cluster that establishes the peering.

- When marked for deletion, peering state will be set to "deleting".
  This way the UI determines the deletion via the state rather than the
  "DeletedAt" field.

Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
2022-07-04 10:47:58 -04:00
alex 90577810cc
peering: add imported/exported counts to peering (#13644)
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
2022-06-29 14:07:30 -07:00
freddygv 6d368b5eed Update peering state and RPC for deferred deletion
When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all
imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of
data at once could overload Consul.

Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that:

1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is
   marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field.

2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for
   deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources
   before deleting the peering itself.

This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service
to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a
PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings
marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the
deferred deletion leader routine.
2022-06-13 12:10:32 -06:00
R.B. Boyer 33b497e7c9
peering: rename initiate to establish in the context of the APIs (#13419) 2022-06-10 11:10:46 -05:00
R.B. Boyer dae47101fa
api: ensure peering API endpoints do not use protobufs (#13204)
I noticed that the JSON api endpoints for peerings json encodes protobufs directly, rather than converting them into their `api` package equivalents before marshal/unmarshaling them.

I updated this and used `mog` to do the annoying part in the middle. 

Other changes:
- the status enum was converted into the friendlier string form of the enum for readability with tools like `curl`
- some of the `api` library functions were slightly modified to match other similar endpoints in UX (cc: @ndhanushkodi )
- peeringRead returns `nil` if not found
- partitions are NOT inferred from the agent's partition (matching 1.11-style logic)
2022-05-25 13:43:35 -05:00
FFMMM 76a6647700
expose meta tags for peering (#12964) 2022-05-09 13:47:37 -07:00
FFMMM 5a6d1cad4e
api: add PeeeringList, polish (#12934) 2022-05-05 14:15:42 -07:00
FFMMM 4cd68b4534
[sync oss] api: add peering api module (#12911) 2022-05-02 11:49:05 -07:00