From an engineers perspective, whenever specifying colors from now on we should use the form:
```
color: rgb(var(--tone-red-500));
```
Please note:
- Use rgb. This lets us do this like rgb(var(--tone-red-500) / 10%) so we can use a 10% opacity red-500 if we ever need to whilst still making use of our color tokens.
- Use --tone-colorName-000 (so the prefix tone). Previously we could use a mix of --gray-500: $gray-500 (note the left hand CSS prop and right hand SASS var) for the things we need to theme currently. As we no longer use SASS we can't do --gray-500: --gray-500, so we now do --tone-gray-500: --gray-500.
Just for clarity after that, whenever specifying a color anywhere, use rgb and --tone. There is only one reason where you might not use tone, and that is if you never want a color to be affected by a theme (for example a background shadow probably always should use --black)
There are a 2 or 3 left for the code editor, plus our custom-query values
> In the future, this should all be moved to each individual repository now, which will mean we can finally get rid of this service.
This PR moves reconciliation to 'each individual repository'. I stopped short of getting rid of the service, but its so small now we pretty much don't need it. I'd rather wait until I look at the equivalent DataSink service and see if we can get rid of both equivalent services together (this also currently dependant on work soon to be merged)
Reconciliation of models (basically doing the extra work to clean up the ember-data store and bring our frontend 'truth' into line with the actual backend truth) when blocking/long-polling on different views/filters of data is slightly more complicated due to figuring out what should be cleaned up and what should be left in the store. This is especially apparent for KVs.
I built in a such a way to hopefully make sure it will all make sense for the future. I also checked that this all worked nicely with all our models, even KV which has never supported blocking queries. I left all that work in so that if we want to enable blocking queries/live updates for KV it now just involves deleting a couple of lines of code.
There is a tonne of old stuff that we can clean up here now (our 'fake headers' that we pass around) and I've added that to my list of thing for a 'Big Cleanup PR' that will remove lots of code that we no longer require.
Add changelog to document what changed.
Add entry to telemetry section of the website to document what changed
Add docs to the usagemetric endpoint to help document the metrics in code
This commit two test failures:
1. Remove check for "in legacy ACL mode", the actual upgrade will be removed in a following commit.
2. Remove the early WaitForLeader in dc2, because with it the test was
failing with ACL not found.
This commit addresses some left over admin partition FIXMEs
1. Adds Partition correctly to Service Instances
2. Converts non-important 'we can do this later' FIXMEs to TODOs
3. Removes some FIXMEs that I've double checked and addressed.
Most of the remaining FIXMEs I'm waiting on responses to questions from
the consul core folks for. I'll address those in a separate PR.
Our DataSource came in very iteratively, when we first started using it we specifically tried not to use it for things that would require portions of the @src="" attribute to be URL encoded (so things like service names couldn't be used, but dc etc would be fine). We then gradually added an easy way to url encode the @src="" attributes with a uri helper and began to use the DataSource component more and more. This meant that some DataSource usage continued to be used without our uri helper.
Recently we hit #10901 which was a direct result of us not encoding @src values/URIs (I didn't realise this was one of the places that required URL encoding) and not going back over things to finish things off once we had implemented our uri helper, resulting in ~half of the codebase using it and ~half of it not.
Now that almost all of the UI uses our DataSource component, this PR makes it even harder to not use the uri helper, by wrapping the string that it requires in a private URI class/object, that is then expected/asserted within the DataSource component/service. This means that as a result of this PR you cannot pass a plain string to the DataSource component without seeing an error in your JS console, which in turn means you have to use the uri helper, and it's very very hard to not URL encode any dynamic/user provided values, which otherwise could lead to bugs/errors similar to the one mentioned above.
The error that you see when you don't use the uri helper is currently a 'soft' dev time only error, but like our other functionality that produces a soft error when you mistakenly pass an undefined value to a uri, at some point soon we will make these hard failing "do not do this" errors.
Both of these 'soft error' DX features have been used this to great effect to implement our Admin Partition feature and these kind of things will minimize the amount of these types of bugs moving forwards in a preventative rather than curative manner. Hopefully these are the some of the kinds of things that get added to our codebase that prevent a multitude of problems and therefore are often never noticed/appreciated.
Additionally here we moved the remaining non-uri using DataSources to use uri (that were now super easy to find), and also fixed up a place where I noticed (due to the soft errors) where we were sometimes passing undefined values to a uri call.
The work here also led me to find another couple of non-important 'bugs' that I've PRed already separately, one of which is yet to be merged (#11105), hence the currently failing tests here. I'll rebase that once that PR is in and the tests here should then pass 🤞
Lastly, I didn't go the whole hog here to make DataSink also be this strict with its uri usage, there is a tiny bit more work on DataSink as a result of recently work, so I may (or may not) make DataSink equally as strict as part of that work in a separate PR.
TestAgentLeaks_Server was reporting a goroutine leak without this. Not sure if it would actually
be a leak in production or if this is due to the test setup, but seems easy enough to call it
this way until we remove legacyACLTokenUpgrade.
We no long need to read the acl serf tag, because servers are always either ACL enabled or
ACL disabled.
We continue to write the tag so that during an upgarde older servers will see the tag.
This commit two test failures:
1. Remove check for "in legacy ACL mode", the actual upgrade will be removed in a following commit.
2. Use the root token in WaitForLeader, because without it the test was
failing with ACL not found.
John Cowen