* Disable ability to select destination if not creating
* Add a LegacyID for intentions that don't have them
* Use `/exact/` endpoint for reading single intentions
* Fix up test for new API interaction
* Upgrade consul-api-double
* Comment out tests using destination for the moment
Also, removed any intention related things from the old page-navigation
tests
* Add sorting to Intentions with tests
* Skip Intentions url back test
* Create comparator for intention and implement in template
* Add a intentions navigation feature test
* Add model layer support for filtering intentions by service
* Add Route, Controller and template for services.show.intentions tab
We are still loading the intentions themselves in the parent Route for
the moment
* Load the intentions in in the parent route for the moment
* Temporarily add support for returning to history -1
Once we have an intention form underneath the service/intention tab this
will no longer be needed
* Add the new tab and enable blocking queries for it
* Add some further acceptance testing around intention listings
* ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests
* ui: Namespace acceptance testing (#7005)
* Update api-double and consul-api-double for http.body
* Adds places where we missed passing the nspace through
* Hardcode nspace CRUD to use the default nspace for policies and roles
* Alter test helpers to allow us to control nspaces from the outside
* Amends to allow tests to account for namespace, move ns from queryParam
1. We decided to move how we pass the namespace value through to the
backend when performing write actions (create, update). Previoulsy we
were using the queryParam although using the post body is the preferred
method to send the Namespace details through to the backend.
2. Other various amends to take into account testing across multiple
namespaced scenarios
* Enable nspace testing by default
* Remove last few occurances of old style http assertions
We had informally 'deprecated' our old style of http assertions that
relied on the order of http calls (even though that order was not
important for the assertion). Following on from our namespace work we
removed the majority of the old occrances of these old style assertions.
This commit removes the remaining few, and also then cleans up the
assertions/http.js file to only include the ones we are using.
This reduces our available step count further and prevents any confusion
over the usage of the old types and the new types.
* ui: Namespace CRUD acceptance tests (#7016)
* Upgrade consul-api-double
* Add all the things required for testing:
1. edit and index page objects
2. enable CONSUL_NSPACE_COUNT cookie setting
3. enable mutating HTTP response bodies based on URL
* Add acceptance test for nspace edit/delete/list and searching
Adds namespace support to the UI:
1. Namespace CRUD/management
2. Show Namespace in relevant areas (intentions, upstreams)
3. Main navigation bar improvements
4. Logic/integration to interact with a new `internal/acl/authorize` endpoint
The error notification was being shown on creation of an intention. This
was as a result of #4572 and/or #4572 and has not been included in a
release.
This includes a fix, plus tests to try to prevent any further regression.
* Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572)
* Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573)
1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin
which better describes what it does
2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove
things work/add confidence for further changes
The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are
now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their
specific routes, i.e. where to redirect.
The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then
notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do
one thing and one thing 'well'.
Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by
mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would
like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based
approach.
There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot
happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
John Cowen