Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris S. Kim 0910c41d95
Revise possible states for a peering. (#13661)
These changes are primarily for Consul's UI, where we want to be more
specific about the state a peering is in.

- The "initial" state was renamed to pending, and no longer applies to
  peerings being established from a peering token.

- Upon request to establish a peering from a peering token, peerings
  will be set as "establishing". This will help distinguish between the
  two roles: the cluster that generates the peering token and the
  cluster that establishes the peering.

- When marked for deletion, peering state will be set to "deleting".
  This way the UI determines the deletion via the state rather than the
  "DeletedAt" field.

Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
2022-07-04 10:47:58 -04:00
R.B. Boyer 2dba16be52
peering: replicate all SpiffeID values necessary for the importing side to do SAN validation (#13612)
When traversing an exported peered service, the discovery chain
evaluation at the other side may re-route the request to a variety of
endpoints. Furthermore we intend to terminate mTLS at the mesh gateway
for arriving peered traffic that is http-like (L7), so the caller needs
to know the mesh gateway's SpiffeID in that case as well.

The following new SpiffeID values will be shipped back in the peerstream
replication:

- tcp: all possible SpiffeIDs resulting from the service-resolver
        component of the exported discovery chain

- http-like: the SpiffeID of the mesh gateway
2022-06-27 14:37:18 -05:00
R.B. Boyer e7a7232a6b
state: peering ID assignment cannot happen inside of the state store (#13525)
Move peering ID assignment outisde of the FSM, so that the ID is written
to the raft log and the same ID is used by all voters, and after
restarts.
2022-06-21 13:04:08 -05:00
R.B. Boyer 93611819e2
xds: mesh gateways now have their own leaf certificate when involved in a peering (#13460)
This is only configured in xDS when a service with an L7 protocol is
exported.

They also load any relevant trust bundles for the peered services to
eventually use for L7 SPIFFE validation during mTLS termination.
2022-06-15 14:36:18 -05:00
freddygv dbcbf3978f Fixup stream tear-down steps.
1. Fix a bug where the peering leader routine would not track all active
   peerings in the "stored" reconciliation map. This could lead to
   tearing down streams where the token was generated, since the
   ConnectedStreams() method used for reconciliation returns all streams
   and not just the ones initiated by this leader routine.

2. Fix a race where stream contexts were being canceled before
   termination messages were being processed by a peer.

   Previously the leader routine would tear down streams by canceling
   their context right after the termination message was sent. This
   context cancelation could be propagated to the server side faster
   than the termination message. Now there is a change where the
   dialing peer uses CloseSend() to signal when no more messages will
   be sent. Eventually the server peer will read an EOF after receiving
   and processing the preceding termination message.

   Using CloseSend() is actually not enough to address the issue
   mentioned, since it doesn't wait for the server peer to finish
   processing messages. Because of this now the dialing peer also reads
   from the stream until an error signals that there are no more
   messages. Receiving an EOF from our peer indicates that they
   processed the termination message and have no additional work to do.

   Given that the stream is being closed, all the messages received by
   Recv are discarded. We only check for errors to avoid importing new
   data.
2022-06-13 12:10:42 -06:00
freddygv 6d368b5eed Update peering state and RPC for deferred deletion
When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all
imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of
data at once could overload Consul.

Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that:

1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is
   marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field.

2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for
   deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources
   before deleting the peering itself.

This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service
to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a
PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings
marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the
deferred deletion leader routine.
2022-06-13 12:10:32 -06:00
freddygv ad6dbe081a Add agent cache-type for TrustBundleListByService
There are a handful of changes in this commit:
* When querying trust bundles for a service we need to be able to
  specify the namespace of the service.
* The endpoint needs to track the index because the cache watches use
  it.
* Extracted bulk of the endpoint's logic to a state store function
  so that index tracking could be tested more easily.
* Removed check for service existence, deferring that sort of work to ACL authz
* Added the cache type
2022-06-01 17:05:10 -06:00
freddygv 073c9e3a91 Update assumptions around exported-service config
Given that the exported-services config entry can use wildcards, the
precedence for wildcards is handled as with intentions. The most exact
match is the match that applies for any given service. We do not take
the union of all that apply.

Another update that was made was to reflect that only one
exported-services config entry applies to any given service in a
partition. This is a pre-existing constraint that gets enforced by
the Normalize() method on that config entry type.
2022-06-01 17:03:51 -06:00
R.B. Boyer bc10055edc
peering: replicate expected SNI, SPIFFE, and service protocol to peers (#13218)
The importing peer will need to know what SNI and SPIFFE name
corresponds to each exported service. Additionally it will need to know
at a high level the protocol in use (L4/L7) to generate the appropriate
connection pool and local metrics.

For replicated connect synthetic entities we edit the `Connect{}` part
of a `NodeService` to have a new section:

    {
      "PeerMeta": {
        "SNI": [
          "web.default.default.owt.external.183150d5-1033-3672-c426-c29205a576b8.consul"
        ],
        "SpiffeID": [
          "spiffe://183150d5-1033-3672-c426-c29205a576b8.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/web"
        ],
        "Protocol": "tcp"
      }
    }

This data is then replicated and saved as-is at the importing side. Both
SNI and SpiffeID are slices for now until I can be sure we don't need
them for how mesh gateways will ultimately work.
2022-05-25 12:37:44 -05:00
R.B. Boyer 91691eca87 peering: replicate discovery chains information to importing peers
Treat each exported service as a "discovery chain" and replicate one
synthetic CheckServiceNode for each chain and remote mesh gateway.

The health will be a flattened generated check of the checks for that
mesh gateway node.
2022-05-19 14:21:44 -05:00
R.B. Boyer 9ad10318cd
add general runstep test helper instead of copying it all over the place (#13013) 2022-05-10 15:25:51 -05:00
Evan Culver d64726c8e9
peering: add store.PeeringsForService implementation (#12957) 2022-05-06 12:35:31 -07:00
R.B. Boyer 809344a6f5
peering: initial sync (#12842)
- Add endpoints related to peering: read, list, generate token, initiate peering
- Update node/service/check table indexing to account for peers
- Foundational changes for pushing service updates to a peer
- Plumb peer name through Health.ServiceNodes path

see: ENT-1765, ENT-1280, ENT-1283, ENT-1283, ENT-1756, ENT-1739, ENT-1750, ENT-1679,
     ENT-1709, ENT-1704, ENT-1690, ENT-1689, ENT-1702, ENT-1701, ENT-1683, ENT-1663,
     ENT-1650, ENT-1678, ENT-1628, ENT-1658, ENT-1640, ENT-1637, ENT-1597, ENT-1634,
     ENT-1613, ENT-1616, ENT-1617, ENT-1591, ENT-1588, ENT-1596, ENT-1572, ENT-1555

Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <eculver@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>
2022-04-21 17:34:40 -05:00