Allow for some message duplication in subscription events during assertions.
I'm pretty sure the subscriptions machinery allows for messages to occasionally
be duplicated instead of dropping them, as a once-and-only-once queue is a pipe
dream and you have to pick one of the other two options.
We need to make a PeerName part of a the service id when present.
This makes sure that peers can export services named
the same as other peers but have the UI still treat them
as separate services.
* ingress-gateways: don't log error when registering gateway
Previously, when an ingress gateway was registered without a
corresponding ingress gateway config entry, an error was logged
because the watch on the config entry returned a nil result.
This is expected so don't log an error.
* config entry: hardcode proxy-defaults name as global
proxy-defaults can only have the name global. Because of this,
we support not even setting the name in the config file:
```
kind = "proxy-defaults"
```
Previously, writing this would result in the output:
```
Config entry written: proxy-defaults/
```
Now it will output:
```
Config entry written: proxy-defaults/global
```
This change follows what was done for the new Mesh config entry.
* autoencrypt: helpful error for clients with wrong dc
If clients have set a different datacenter than the servers they're
connecting with for autoencrypt, give a helpful error message.
This continues the work done in #14908 where a crude solution to prevent a
goroutine leak was implemented. The former code would launch a perpetual
goroutine family every iteration (+1 +1) and the fixed code simply caused a
new goroutine family to first cancel the prior one to prevent the
leak (-1 +1 == 0).
This PR refactors this code completely to:
- make it more understandable
- remove the recursion-via-goroutine strangeness
- prevent unnecessary RPC fetches when the prior one has errored.
The core issue arose from a conflation of the entry.Fetching field to mean:
- there is an RPC (blocking query) in flight right now
- there is a goroutine running to manage the RPC fetch retry loop
The problem is that the goroutine-leak-avoidance check would treat
Fetching like (2), but within the body of a goroutine it would flip that
boolean back to false before the retry sleep. This would cause a new
chain of goroutines to launch which #14908 would correct crudely.
The refactored code uses a plain for-loop and changes the semantics
to track state for "is there a goroutine associated with this cache entry"
instead of the former.
We use a uint64 unique identity per goroutine instead of a boolean so
that any orphaned goroutines can tell when they've been replaced when
the expiry loop deletes a cache entry while the goroutine is still running
and is later replaced.
Derek Menteer