* feat(ingress-gateway): support outlier detection of upstream service for ingress gateway
* changelog
Co-authored-by: Eric Haberkorn <erichaberkorn@gmail.com>
* add leadership transfer command
* add RPC call test (flaky)
* add missing import
* add changelog
* add command registration
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Matt Keeler <mkeeler@users.noreply.github.com>
* add the possibility of providing an id to raft leadership transfer. Add few tests.
* delete old file from cherry pick
* rename changelog filename to PR #
* rename changelog and fix import
* fix failing test
* check for OperatorWrite
Co-authored-by: Matt Keeler <mkeeler@users.noreply.github.com>
* rename from leader-transfer to transfer-leader
* remove version check and add test for operator read
* move struct to operator.go
* first pass
* add code for leader transfer in the grpc backend and tests
* wire the http endpoint to the new grpc endpoint
* remove the RPC endpoint
* remove non needed struct
* fix naming
* add mog glue to API
* fix comment
* remove dead code
* fix linter error
* change package name for proto file
* remove error wrapping
* fix failing test
* add command registration
* add grpc service mock tests
* fix receiver to be pointer
* use defined values
Co-authored-by: Matt Keeler <mkeeler@users.noreply.github.com>
* reuse MockAclAuthorizer
* add documentation
* remove usage of external.TokenFromContext
* fix failing tests
* fix proto generation
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Jared Kirschner <85913323+jkirschner-hashicorp@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Jared Kirschner <85913323+jkirschner-hashicorp@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Jared Kirschner <85913323+jkirschner-hashicorp@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
* add more context in doc for the reason
* Apply suggestions from docs code review
Co-authored-by: Jeff Boruszak <104028618+boruszak@users.noreply.github.com>
* regenerate proto
* fix linter errors
Co-authored-by: github-team-consul-core <github-team-consul-core@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Keeler <mkeeler@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Kirschner <85913323+jkirschner-hashicorp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Boruszak <104028618+boruszak@users.noreply.github.com>
Re-add ServerExternalAddresses parameter in GenerateToken endpoint
This reverts commit 5e156772f6a7fba5324eb6804ae4e93c091229a6
and adds extra functionality to support newer peering behaviors.
To support Destinations on the service-defaults (for tproxy with terminating gateway), we need to now also make servers watch service-defaults config entries.
Fix an issue where rpc_hold_timeout was being used as the timeout for non-blocking queries. Users should be able to tune read timeouts without fiddling with rpc_hold_timeout. A new configuration `rpc_read_timeout` is created.
Refactor some implementation from the original PR 11500 to remove the misleading linkage between RPCInfo's timeout (used to retry in case of certain modes of failures) and the client RPC timeouts.
Fixes a `go vet` warning caused by the pragma.DoNotCopy on the protobuf
message type.
Originally I'd hoped we wouldn't need any reflection in the proxycfg hot
path, but it seems proto.Clone is the only supported way to copy a message.
Replaces the reflection-based implementation of proxycfg's
ConfigSnapshot.Clone with code generated by deep-copy.
While load testing server-based xDS (for consul-dataplane) we discovered
this method is extremely expensive. The ConfigSnapshot struct, directly
or indirectly, contains a copy of many of the structs in the agent/structs
package, which creates a large graph for copystructure.Copy to traverse
at runtime, on every proxy reconfiguration.
* feat(ingress gateway: support configuring limits in ingress-gateway config entry
- a new Defaults field with max_connections, max_pending_connections, max_requests
is added to ingress gateway config entry
- new field max_connections, max_pending_connections, max_requests in
individual services to overwrite the value in Default
- added unit test and integration test
- updated doc
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Boruszak <104028618+boruszak@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dan Stough <dan.stough@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Haberkorn <erichaberkorn@gmail.com>
By adding a SpiffeID for server agents, servers can now request a leaf
certificate from the Connect CA.
This new Spiffe ID has a key property: servers are identified by their
datacenter name and trust domain. All servers that share these
attributes will share a ServerURI.
The aim is to use these certificates to verify the server name of ANY
server in a Consul datacenter.
We need to watch for changes to peerings and update the server addresses which get served by the ring buffer.
Also, if there is an active connection for a peer, we are getting up-to-date server addresses from the replication stream and can safely ignore the token's addresses which may be stale.
Previously establishment and pending secrets were only checked at the
RPC layer. However, given that these are Check-and-Set transactions we
should ensure that the given secrets are still valid when persisting a
secret exchange or promotion.
Otherwise it would be possible for concurrent requests to overwrite each
other.
Previously there was a field indicating the operation that triggered a
secrets write. Now there is a message for each operation and it contains
the secret ID being persisted.
Previously the updates to the peering secrets UUID table relied on
inferring what action triggered the update based on a reconciliation
against the existing secrets.
Instead we now explicitly require the operation to be given so that the
inference isn't necessary. This makes the UUID table logic easier to
reason about and fixes some related bugs.
There is also an update so that the peering secrets get handled on
snapshots/restores.
Update generate token endpoint (rpc, http, and api module)
If ServerExternalAddresses are set, it will override any addresses gotten from the "consul" service, and be used in the token instead, and dialed by the dialer. This allows for setting up a load balancer for example, in front of the consul servers.
This mimics xDS's discovery protocol where you must request a resource
explicitly for the exporting side to send those events to you.
As part of this I aligned the overall ResourceURL with the TypeURL that
gets embedded into the encoded protobuf Any construct. The
CheckServiceNodes is now wrapped in a better named "ExportedService"
struct now.
Prior to this the dialing side of the peering would only ever work within the default partition. This commit allows properly parsing the partition field out of the API struct request body, query param and header.
This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2242.
This PR introduces a server-local implementation of the proxycfg.ServiceList
interface, backed by streaming events and a local materializer.
We cannot do this for "subscribe" and "partition" this easily without
breakage so those are omitted.
Any protobuf message passed around via an Any construct will have the
fully qualified package name embedded in the protobuf as a string. Also
RPC method dispatch will include the package of the service during
serialization.
- We will be passing pbservice and pbpeering through an Any as part of
peer stream replication.
- We will be exposing two new gRPC services via pbpeering and
pbpeerstream.
- Use some protobuf construction helper methods for brevity.
- Rename a local variable to avoid later shadowing.
- Rename the Nonce field to be more like xDS's naming.
- Be more explicit about which PeerID fields are empty.
Peer replication is intended to be between separate Consul installs and
effectively should be considered "external". This PR moves the peer
stream replication bidirectional RPC endpoint to the external gRPC
server and ensures that things continue to function.
These changes are primarily for Consul's UI, where we want to be more
specific about the state a peering is in.
- The "initial" state was renamed to pending, and no longer applies to
peerings being established from a peering token.
- Upon request to establish a peering from a peering token, peerings
will be set as "establishing". This will help distinguish between the
two roles: the cluster that generates the peering token and the
cluster that establishes the peering.
- When marked for deletion, peering state will be set to "deleting".
This way the UI determines the deletion via the state rather than the
"DeletedAt" field.
Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
cskh