acl: correctly extend the cache for acl identities during resolution (#5475)
This commit is contained in:
parent
4956d632b9
commit
e9614ee92f
|
@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ func (r *ACLResolver) resolveIdentityFromTokenAsync(token string, cached *struct
|
|||
if cached != nil && (r.config.ACLDownPolicy == "extend-cache" || r.config.ACLDownPolicy == "async-cache") {
|
||||
// extend the cache
|
||||
r.fireAsyncTokenResult(token, cached.Identity, nil)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r.fireAsyncTokenResult(token, nil, err)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -353,6 +353,29 @@ func TestACLResolver_ResolveRootACL(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached := func(t *testing.T, r *ACLResolver, token string, present bool, msg string) {
|
||||
t.Helper()
|
||||
|
||||
cacheVal := r.cache.GetIdentity(token)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal)
|
||||
if present {
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal.Identity, msg)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
require.Nil(t, cacheVal.Identity, msg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
requirePolicyCached := func(t *testing.T, r *ACLResolver, policyID string, present bool, msg string) {
|
||||
t.Helper()
|
||||
|
||||
cacheVal := r.cache.GetPolicy(policyID)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal)
|
||||
if present {
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal.Policy, msg)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
require.Nil(t, cacheVal.Policy, msg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Parallel()
|
||||
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
||||
|
@ -373,6 +396,8 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.Equal(t, authz, acl.DenyAll())
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", false, "not present")
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -395,6 +420,8 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.Equal(t, authz, acl.AllowAll())
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", false, "not present")
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -432,12 +459,18 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
|
||||
// policy cache expired - so we will fail to resolve that policy and use the default policy only
|
||||
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
||||
require.False(t, authz == authz2)
|
||||
require.False(t, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", false, "expired") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", false, "expired") // from "found" token
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Extend-Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -469,12 +502,16 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", true, "cached")
|
||||
|
||||
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
||||
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
||||
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", true, "still cached")
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -512,12 +549,18 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
|
||||
// Will just use the policy cache
|
||||
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Async-Cache-Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -557,6 +600,9 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
|
||||
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
||||
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
@ -565,6 +611,9 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
|
||||
// the go routine spawned will eventually return with a authz that doesn't have the policy
|
||||
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
||||
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
||||
|
@ -572,6 +621,9 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
assert.NotNil(t, authz3)
|
||||
assert.False(t, authz3.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", false, "no longer cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", false, "no longer cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Client", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -620,12 +672,18 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
|
||||
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
||||
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
||||
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("Async-Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
@ -657,6 +715,8 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", true, "cached")
|
||||
|
||||
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
||||
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
@ -665,6 +725,8 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
||||
require.True(t, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", true, "cached")
|
||||
|
||||
// the go routine spawned will eventually return and this will be a not found error
|
||||
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
||||
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
||||
|
@ -672,6 +734,8 @@ func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
assert.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
||||
assert.Nil(t, authz3)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
requireIdentityCached(t, r, "foo", false, "no longer cached")
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue