General improvements to the wording
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa2b139cf4
commit
e84891296c
|
@ -12,43 +12,43 @@ description: >-
|
|||
# Gossip Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
Consul uses a [gossip protocol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip_protocol)
|
||||
to manage membership and broadcast messages to the cluster. All of this is provided
|
||||
through the use of the [Serf library](https://www.serf.io/). The gossip protocol
|
||||
used by Serf is based on
|
||||
["SWIM: Scalable Weakly-consistent Infection-style Process Group Membership Protocol"](https://www.cs.cornell.edu/projects/Quicksilver/public_pdfs/SWIM.pdf),
|
||||
with a few minor adaptations. There are more details about [Serf's protocol here](https://www.serf.io/docs/internals/gossip.html).
|
||||
to manage membership and broadcast messages to the cluster. The protocol, membership management, and message broadcasting is provided
|
||||
through the [Serf library](https://www.serf.io/). The gossip protocol
|
||||
used by Serf is based on a modified version of the
|
||||
[SWIM (Scalable Weakly-consistent Infection-style Process Group Membership)](https://www.cs.cornell.edu/projects/Quicksilver/public_pdfs/SWIM.pdf) protocol.
|
||||
Refer to the [Serf documentation](https://www.serf.io/docs/internals/gossip.html) for additional information about the gossip protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
## Gossip in Consul
|
||||
|
||||
Consul makes use of two different gossip pools. We refer to each pool as the
|
||||
LAN or WAN pool respectively. Each datacenter Consul operates in has a LAN gossip pool
|
||||
containing all members of the datacenter, both clients and servers. The LAN pool is
|
||||
used for a few purposes. Membership information allows clients to automatically discover
|
||||
servers, reducing the amount of configuration needed. The distributed failure detection
|
||||
allows the work of failure detection to be shared by the entire cluster instead of
|
||||
concentrated on a few servers. Lastly, the gossip pool allows for reliable and fast
|
||||
event broadcasts.
|
||||
Consul uses a LAN gossip pool and a WAN gossip pool to perform different functions. The pools
|
||||
are able to perform their functions by leveraging an embedded [Serf](https://www.serf.io/)
|
||||
library. The library is abstracted and masked by Consul to simplify the user experience,
|
||||
but developers may find it useful to understand how the library is leveraged.
|
||||
|
||||
The WAN pool is globally unique, as all servers should participate in the WAN pool
|
||||
### LAN Gossip Pool
|
||||
|
||||
Each datacenter that Consul operates in has a LAN gossip pool containing all members
|
||||
of the datacenter (clients _and_ servers). Membership information provided by the
|
||||
LAN pool allows clients to automatically discover servers, reducing the amount of
|
||||
configuration needed. Failure detection is also distributed and shared by the entire cluster,
|
||||
instead of concentrated on a few servers. Lastly, the gossip pool allows for fast and
|
||||
reliable event broadcasts.
|
||||
|
||||
### WAN Gossip Pool
|
||||
|
||||
The WAN pool is globally unique. All servers should participate in the WAN pool,
|
||||
regardless of datacenter. Membership information provided by the WAN pool allows
|
||||
servers to perform cross datacenter requests. The integrated failure detection
|
||||
allows Consul to gracefully handle an entire datacenter losing connectivity, or just
|
||||
a single server in a remote datacenter.
|
||||
|
||||
All of these features are provided by leveraging [Serf](https://www.serf.io/). It
|
||||
is used as an embedded library to provide these features. From a user perspective,
|
||||
this is not important, since the abstraction should be masked by Consul. It can be useful
|
||||
however as a developer to understand how this library is leveraged.
|
||||
servers to perform cross-datacenter requests. The integrated failure detection
|
||||
allows Consul to gracefully handle loss of connectivity--whether the loss is for
|
||||
an entire datacenter, or a single server in a remote datacenter.
|
||||
|
||||
## Lifeguard Enhancements ((#lifeguard))
|
||||
|
||||
SWIM makes the assumption that the local node is healthy in the sense
|
||||
that soft real-time processing of packets is possible. However, in cases
|
||||
where the local node is experiencing CPU or network exhaustion this assumption
|
||||
can be violated. The result is that the `serfHealth` check status can
|
||||
occasionally flap, resulting in false monitoring alarms, adding noise to
|
||||
telemetry, and simply causing the overall cluster to waste CPU and network
|
||||
resources diagnosing a failure that may not truly exist.
|
||||
SWIM assumes that the local node is healthy, meaning that soft real-time packet
|
||||
processing is possible. The assumption may be violated, however, if the local node
|
||||
experiences CPU or network exhaustion. In these cases, the `serfHealth` check status
|
||||
can flap. This can result in false monitoring alarms, additional telemetry noise, and
|
||||
CPU and network resources being wasted as they attempt to diagnose non-existent failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Lifeguard completely resolves this issue with novel enhancements to SWIM.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue