From 7309cbadb9d09b121a4c6b83b13cc1978dd2b883 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Holland Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:20:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Improve clarity of ?keys behaviour. I read the previous version initially as meaning that it would return a list of keys which have no value set, which I couldn't understand. I think this removes some ambiguity. --- website/source/docs/agent/http.html.markdown | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/website/source/docs/agent/http.html.markdown b/website/source/docs/agent/http.html.markdown index 8fb232c64..c95662b05 100644 --- a/website/source/docs/agent/http.html.markdown +++ b/website/source/docs/agent/http.html.markdown @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ The `Key` is simply the full path of the entry. `Flags` are an opaque unsigned integer that can be attached to each entry. The use of this is left totally to the user. Lastly, the `Value` is a base64 key value. -It is possible to also only list keys without any values by using the +It is possible to also only list keys without their values by using the "?keys" query parameter along with a `GET` request. This will return a list of the keys under the given prefix. The optional "?separator=" can be used to list only up to a given separator.