luxolus
/
open-consul
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
open-consul/ui/packages/consul-ui/tests/acceptance/dc/acls/update.feature

50 lines
1.6 KiB
Gherkin
Raw Normal View History

WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
@setupApplicationTest
ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests (#6980) * ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests * ui: Namespace acceptance testing (#7005) * Update api-double and consul-api-double for http.body * Adds places where we missed passing the nspace through * Hardcode nspace CRUD to use the default nspace for policies and roles * Alter test helpers to allow us to control nspaces from the outside * Amends to allow tests to account for namespace, move ns from queryParam 1. We decided to move how we pass the namespace value through to the backend when performing write actions (create, update). Previoulsy we were using the queryParam although using the post body is the preferred method to send the Namespace details through to the backend. 2. Other various amends to take into account testing across multiple namespaced scenarios * Enable nspace testing by default * Remove last few occurances of old style http assertions We had informally 'deprecated' our old style of http assertions that relied on the order of http calls (even though that order was not important for the assertion). Following on from our namespace work we removed the majority of the old occrances of these old style assertions. This commit removes the remaining few, and also then cleans up the assertions/http.js file to only include the ones we are using. This reduces our available step count further and prevents any confusion over the usage of the old types and the new types. * ui: Namespace CRUD acceptance tests (#7016) * Upgrade consul-api-double * Add all the things required for testing: 1. edit and index page objects 2. enable CONSUL_NSPACE_COUNT cookie setting 3. enable mutating HTTP response bodies based on URL * Add acceptance test for nspace edit/delete/list and searching
2020-01-24 12:26:28 +00:00
@notNamespaceable
Add some delete testing to KV and ACL
2018-06-04 13:53:51 +00:00
Feature: dc / acls / update: ACL Update
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
Background:
WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
Given 1 datacenter model with the value "datacenter"
UI: Catch 500 error on token endpoint and revert to legacy tokens (#4874) In some circumstances a consul 1.4 client could be running in an un-upgraded 1.3 or lower cluster. Currently this gives a 500 error on the new ACL token endpoint. Here we catch this specific 500 error/message and set the users AccessorID to null. Elsewhere in the frontend we use this fact (AccessorID being null) to decide whether to present the legacy or the new ACL UI to the user. Also: - Re-adds in most of the old style ACL acceptance tests, now that we are keeping the old style UI - Restricts code editors to HCL only mode for all `Rules` editing (legacy/'half legacy'/new style) - Adds a [Stop using] button to the old style ACL rows so its possible to logout. - Updates copy and documentation links for the upgrade notices
2018-11-02 14:44:36 +00:00
And I'm using a legacy token
WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
And 1 acl model from yaml
---
ID: key
---
When I visit the acl page for yaml
---
dc: datacenter
acl: key
---
Prevent being able to submit a create form with empty values
2018-06-11 11:50:58 +00:00
Then the url should be /datacenter/acls/key
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
Scenario: Update to [Name], [Type], [Rules]
Use html5 oninput instead of onkeyup for native textual inputs This enables people to enter things using the mouse to paste for example, plus possible other things. As an aside it also answers my query regarding `fillIn` for testing, nothing needs to be actually _typed_ anymore! Doh
2018-07-03 14:40:15 +00:00
Then I fill in with yaml
WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
---
name: [Name]
---
And I click "[value=[Type]]"
And I submit
ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests (#6980) * ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests * ui: Namespace acceptance testing (#7005) * Update api-double and consul-api-double for http.body * Adds places where we missed passing the nspace through * Hardcode nspace CRUD to use the default nspace for policies and roles * Alter test helpers to allow us to control nspaces from the outside * Amends to allow tests to account for namespace, move ns from queryParam 1. We decided to move how we pass the namespace value through to the backend when performing write actions (create, update). Previoulsy we were using the queryParam although using the post body is the preferred method to send the Namespace details through to the backend. 2. Other various amends to take into account testing across multiple namespaced scenarios * Enable nspace testing by default * Remove last few occurances of old style http assertions We had informally 'deprecated' our old style of http assertions that relied on the order of http calls (even though that order was not important for the assertion). Following on from our namespace work we removed the majority of the old occrances of these old style assertions. This commit removes the remaining few, and also then cleans up the assertions/http.js file to only include the ones we are using. This reduces our available step count further and prevents any confusion over the usage of the old types and the new types. * ui: Namespace CRUD acceptance tests (#7016) * Upgrade consul-api-double * Add all the things required for testing: 1. edit and index page objects 2. enable CONSUL_NSPACE_COUNT cookie setting 3. enable mutating HTTP response bodies based on URL * Add acceptance test for nspace edit/delete/list and searching
2020-01-24 12:26:28 +00:00
Then a PUT request was made to "/v1/acl/update?dc=datacenter" from yaml
WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
---
ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests (#6980) * ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests * ui: Namespace acceptance testing (#7005) * Update api-double and consul-api-double for http.body * Adds places where we missed passing the nspace through * Hardcode nspace CRUD to use the default nspace for policies and roles * Alter test helpers to allow us to control nspaces from the outside * Amends to allow tests to account for namespace, move ns from queryParam 1. We decided to move how we pass the namespace value through to the backend when performing write actions (create, update). Previoulsy we were using the queryParam although using the post body is the preferred method to send the Namespace details through to the backend. 2. Other various amends to take into account testing across multiple namespaced scenarios * Enable nspace testing by default * Remove last few occurances of old style http assertions We had informally 'deprecated' our old style of http assertions that relied on the order of http calls (even though that order was not important for the assertion). Following on from our namespace work we removed the majority of the old occrances of these old style assertions. This commit removes the remaining few, and also then cleans up the assertions/http.js file to only include the ones we are using. This reduces our available step count further and prevents any confusion over the usage of the old types and the new types. * ui: Namespace CRUD acceptance tests (#7016) * Upgrade consul-api-double * Add all the things required for testing: 1. edit and index page objects 2. enable CONSUL_NSPACE_COUNT cookie setting 3. enable mutating HTTP response bodies based on URL * Add acceptance test for nspace edit/delete/list and searching
2020-01-24 12:26:28 +00:00
body:
Name: [Name]
Type: [Type]
WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
---
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
Then the url should be /datacenter/acls
And "[data-notification]" has the "notification-update" class
And "[data-notification]" has the "success" class
WIP: Feature/acceptance tests
2018-05-11 12:47:21 +00:00
Where:
----------------------------------------------------------
| Name | Type | Rules |
| key-name | client | node "0" {policy = "read"} |
| key name | management | node "0" {policy = "write"} |
| key%20name | client | node "0" {policy = "read"} |
| utf8? | management | node "0" {policy = "write"} |
----------------------------------------------------------
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
Scenario: There was an error saving the key
Given the url "/v1/acl/update" responds with a 500 status
And I submit
Then the url should be /datacenter/acls/key
Then "[data-notification]" has the "notification-update" class
And "[data-notification]" has the "error" class
# @ignore
# Scenario: Rules can be edited/updated
# Then ok