open-consul/agent/consul/kvs_endpoint_test.go

1021 lines
22 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package consul
import (
"os"
"testing"
"time"
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
msgpackrpc "github.com/hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/acl"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/api"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/testrpc"
)
func TestKVS_Apply(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "test",
Flags: 42,
Value: []byte("test"),
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
// Verify
state := s1.fsm.State()
_, d, err := state.KVSGet(nil, "test", &arg.DirEnt.EnterpriseMeta)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if d == nil {
t.Fatalf("should not be nil")
}
// Do a check and set
arg.Op = api.KVCAS
arg.DirEnt.ModifyIndex = d.ModifyIndex
arg.DirEnt.Flags = 43
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
// Check this was applied
if out != true {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", out)
}
// Verify
_, d, err = state.KVSGet(nil, "test", &arg.DirEnt.EnterpriseMeta)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if d.Flags != 43 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
}
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
func TestKVS_Apply_ACLDeny(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
c.PrimaryDatacenter = "dc1"
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
c.ACLsEnabled = true
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
c.ACLResolverSettings.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
})
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1", testrpc.WithToken("root"))
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
// Create the ACL
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: structs.ACLSet,
ACL: structs.ACL{
Name: "User token",
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
Rules: testListRules,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out string
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ACL.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
id := out
// Try a write
argR := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "foo/bar",
Flags: 42,
Value: []byte("test"),
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: id},
}
var outR bool
err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &argR, &outR)
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
// Try a recursive delete
argR = structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVDeleteTree,
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "test",
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: id},
}
err = msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &argR, &outR)
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
func TestKVS_Get(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "test",
Flags: 42,
Value: []byte("test"),
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "test",
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Get", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
d := dirent.Entries[0]
if d.Flags != 42 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
if string(d.Value) != "test" {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
}
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
func TestKVS_Get_ACLDeny(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
c.PrimaryDatacenter = "dc1"
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
c.ACLsEnabled = true
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
c.ACLResolverSettings.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
})
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1", testrpc.WithToken("root"))
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
Key: "zip",
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
Flags: 42,
Value: []byte("test"),
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
}
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
Key: "zip",
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Get", &getR, &dirent); !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
t.Fatalf("Expected %v, got err: %v", acl.ErrPermissionDenied, err)
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
}
}
func TestKVSEndpoint_List(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
keys := []string{
"/test/key1",
"/test/key2",
"/test/sub/key3",
}
for _, key := range keys {
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: key,
Flags: 1,
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "/test",
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 3 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Entries)
}
for i := 0; i < len(dirent.Entries); i++ {
d := dirent.Entries[i]
if d.Key != keys[i] {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
if d.Flags != 1 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
if d.Value != nil {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
}
2015-10-13 18:48:35 +00:00
// Try listing a nonexistent prefix
getR.Key = "/nope"
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
2015-10-13 18:48:35 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Entries)
}
}
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
func TestKVSEndpoint_List_Blocking(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
keys := []string{
"/test/key1",
"/test/key2",
"/test/sub/key3",
}
for _, key := range keys {
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: key,
Flags: 1,
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "/test",
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
// Setup a blocking query
getR.MinQueryIndex = dirent.Index
getR.MaxQueryTime = time.Second
// Async cause a change
start := time.Now()
go func() {
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVDelete,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "/test/sub/key3",
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Errorf("RPC call failed: %v", err)
}
}()
// Re-run the query
dirent = structs.IndexedDirEntries{}
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
// Should block at least 100ms
if time.Since(start) < 100*time.Millisecond {
t.Fatalf("too fast")
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 2 {
for _, ent := range dirent.Entries {
t.Errorf("Bad: %#v", *ent)
}
}
for i := 0; i < len(dirent.Entries); i++ {
d := dirent.Entries[i]
if d.Key != keys[i] {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
if d.Flags != 1 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
if d.Value != nil {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
}
}
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
func TestKVSEndpoint_List_ACLDeny(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
c.PrimaryDatacenter = "dc1"
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
c.ACLsEnabled = true
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
c.ACLResolverSettings.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
})
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1", testrpc.WithToken("root"))
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
keys := []string{
"abe",
"bar",
"foo",
"test",
"zip",
}
for _, key := range keys {
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: key,
Flags: 1,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: structs.ACLSet,
ACL: structs.ACL{
Name: "User token",
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
Rules: testListRules,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out string
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ACL.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
id := out
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: id},
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Entries)
}
for i := 0; i < len(dirent.Entries); i++ {
d := dirent.Entries[i]
switch i {
case 0:
if d.Key != "foo" {
t.Fatalf("bad key")
}
case 1:
if d.Key != "test" {
t.Fatalf("bad key")
}
}
}
}
func TestKVSEndpoint_List_ACLEnableKeyListPolicy(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
c.PrimaryDatacenter = "dc1"
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
c.ACLsEnabled = true
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
c.ACLResolverSettings.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
c.ACLEnableKeyListPolicy = true
})
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1", testrpc.WithToken("root"))
keys := []string{
"abe",
"bar/bar1",
"bar/bar2",
"zip",
}
for _, key := range keys {
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: key,
Flags: 1,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
//write acl policy that denies recursive reads on ""
var testListRules1 = `
key "" {
policy = "deny"
}
key "bar" {
policy = "list"
}
key "zip" {
policy = "read"
}
`
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: structs.ACLSet,
ACL: structs.ACL{
Name: "User token",
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
Rules: testListRules1,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out string
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ACL.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
id := out
//recursive read on empty prefix should fail
getReq := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: id},
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getReq, &dirent); !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
t.Fatalf("expected %v but got err: %v", acl.ErrPermissionDenied, err)
}
//listing keys on empty prefix should fail
getKeysReq := structs.KeyListRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Prefix: "",
Seperator: "/",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: id},
}
var keyList structs.IndexedKeyList
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.ListKeys", &getKeysReq, &keyList); !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
t.Fatalf("expected %v but got err: %v", acl.ErrPermissionDenied, err)
}
// recursive read with a prefix that has list permissions should succeed
getReq2 := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "bar",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: id},
}
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.List", &getReq2, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
expectedKeys := []string{"bar/bar1", "bar/bar2"}
var actualKeys []string
for _, entry := range dirent.Entries {
actualKeys = append(actualKeys, entry.Key)
}
require.Equal(t, expectedKeys, actualKeys)
// list keys with a prefix that has list permissions should succeed
getKeysReq2 := structs.KeyListRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Prefix: "bar",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: id},
}
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.ListKeys", &getKeysReq2, &keyList); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
actualKeys = keyList.Keys
require.Equal(t, expectedKeys, actualKeys)
}
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
func TestKVSEndpoint_ListKeys(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
keys := []string{
"/test/key1",
"/test/key2",
"/test/sub/key3",
}
for _, key := range keys {
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: key,
Flags: 1,
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
getR := structs.KeyListRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Prefix: "/test/",
Seperator: "/",
}
var dirent structs.IndexedKeyList
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.ListKeys", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Keys) != 3 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
if dirent.Keys[0] != "/test/key1" {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
if dirent.Keys[1] != "/test/key2" {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
if dirent.Keys[2] != "/test/sub/" {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
2015-10-13 18:48:35 +00:00
// Try listing a nonexistent prefix
getR.Prefix = "/nope"
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.ListKeys", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
2015-10-13 18:48:35 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Keys) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
}
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
func TestKVSEndpoint_ListKeys_ACLDeny(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
c.PrimaryDatacenter = "dc1"
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
c.ACLsEnabled = true
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
c.ACLResolverSettings.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
})
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1", testrpc.WithToken("root"))
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
keys := []string{
"abe",
"bar",
"foo",
"test",
"zip",
}
for _, key := range keys {
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: key,
Flags: 1,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: structs.ACLSet,
ACL: structs.ACL{
Name: "User token",
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
Rules: testListRules,
},
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
}
var out string
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "ACL.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
id := out
getR := structs.KeyListRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Prefix: "",
Seperator: "/",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{Token: id},
}
var dirent structs.IndexedKeyList
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.ListKeys", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Keys) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
if dirent.Keys[0] != "foo" {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
if dirent.Keys[1] != "test" {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent.Keys)
}
}
func TestKVS_Apply_LockDelay(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
// Create and invalidate a session with a lock.
state := s1.fsm.State()
if err := state.EnsureNode(1, &structs.Node{Node: "foo", Address: "127.0.0.1"}); err != nil {
2014-11-01 21:56:48 +00:00
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
session := &structs.Session{
ID: generateUUID(),
Node: "foo",
LockDelay: 50 * time.Millisecond,
}
if err := state.SessionCreate(2, session); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
id := session.ID
d := &structs.DirEntry{
Key: "test",
Session: id,
}
if ok, err := state.KVSLock(3, d); err != nil || !ok {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if err := state.SessionDestroy(4, id, nil); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
// Make a new session that is valid.
if err := state.SessionCreate(5, session); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
validID := session.ID
// Make a lock request.
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVLock,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "test",
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
Session: validID,
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if out != false {
t.Fatalf("should not acquire")
}
// Wait for lock-delay.
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
// Should acquire.
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if out != true {
t.Fatalf("should acquire")
}
2014-04-28 23:33:54 +00:00
}
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
func TestKVS_Issue_1626(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("too slow for testing.Short")
}
t.Parallel()
dir1, s1 := testServer(t)
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
defer s1.Shutdown()
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
testrpc.WaitForTestAgent(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
// Set up the first key.
{
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "foo/test",
Value: []byte("test"),
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
// Retrieve the base key and snag the index.
var index uint64
{
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "foo/test",
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Get", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
if dirent.Index == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
d := dirent.Entries[0]
if string(d.Value) != "test" {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
index = dirent.Index
}
// Set up a blocking query on the base key.
doneCh := make(chan *structs.IndexedDirEntries, 1)
go func() {
codec := rpcClient(t, s1)
defer codec.Close()
getR := structs.KeyRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Key: "foo/test",
QueryOptions: structs.QueryOptions{
MinQueryIndex: index,
MaxQueryTime: 3 * time.Second,
},
}
var dirent structs.IndexedDirEntries
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Get", &getR, &dirent); err != nil {
t.Errorf("RPC call failed: %v", err)
return
}
doneCh <- &dirent
}()
// Now update a second key with a prefix that has the first key name
// as part of it.
{
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "foo/test2",
Value: []byte("test"),
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
// Make sure the blocking query didn't wake up for this update.
select {
case <-doneCh:
t.Fatalf("Blocking query should not have completed")
case <-time.After(1 * time.Second):
}
// Now update the first key's payload.
{
arg := structs.KVSRequest{
Datacenter: "dc1",
Op: api.KVSet,
DirEnt: structs.DirEntry{
Key: "foo/test",
Value: []byte("updated"),
},
}
var out bool
if err := msgpackrpc.CallWithCodec(codec, "KVS.Apply", &arg, &out); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
}
}
// Make sure the blocking query wakes up for the final update.
select {
case dirent := <-doneCh:
if dirent.Index <= index {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
if len(dirent.Entries) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", dirent)
}
d := dirent.Entries[0]
if string(d.Value) != "updated" {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", d)
}
case <-time.After(1 * time.Second):
t.Fatalf("Blocking query should have completed")
}
}
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
var testListRules = `
key "" {
policy = "deny"
}
key "foo" {
policy = "read"
}
key "test" {
policy = "write"
}
2014-08-15 02:25:12 +00:00
key "test/priv" {
policy = "read"
}
2014-08-13 19:09:39 +00:00
`