luxolus
/
open-consul
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
open-consul/ui-v2/tests/acceptance/dc/kvs/sessions/invalidate.feature

33 lines
1.3 KiB
Gherkin
Raw Normal View History

UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
@setupApplicationTest
Feature: dc / kvs / sessions / invalidate: Invalidate Lock Sessions
In order to invalidate a lock session
As a user
I should be able to invalidate a lock session by clicking a button and confirming
Background:
Given 1 datacenter model with the value "datacenter"
And 1 kv model from yaml
---
Key: key
---
When I visit the kv page for yaml
---
dc: datacenter
kv: key
---
Then the url should be /datacenter/kv/key/edit
Scenario: Invalidating the lock session
And I click delete on the session
And I click confirmDelete on the session
ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests (#6980) * ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests * ui: Namespace acceptance testing (#7005) * Update api-double and consul-api-double for http.body * Adds places where we missed passing the nspace through * Hardcode nspace CRUD to use the default nspace for policies and roles * Alter test helpers to allow us to control nspaces from the outside * Amends to allow tests to account for namespace, move ns from queryParam 1. We decided to move how we pass the namespace value through to the backend when performing write actions (create, update). Previoulsy we were using the queryParam although using the post body is the preferred method to send the Namespace details through to the backend. 2. Other various amends to take into account testing across multiple namespaced scenarios * Enable nspace testing by default * Remove last few occurances of old style http assertions We had informally 'deprecated' our old style of http assertions that relied on the order of http calls (even though that order was not important for the assertion). Following on from our namespace work we removed the majority of the old occrances of these old style assertions. This commit removes the remaining few, and also then cleans up the assertions/http.js file to only include the ones we are using. This reduces our available step count further and prevents any confusion over the usage of the old types and the new types. * ui: Namespace CRUD acceptance tests (#7016) * Upgrade consul-api-double * Add all the things required for testing: 1. edit and index page objects 2. enable CONSUL_NSPACE_COUNT cookie setting 3. enable mutating HTTP response bodies based on URL * Add acceptance test for nspace edit/delete/list and searching
2020-01-24 12:26:28 +00:00
Then a PUT request was made to "/v1/session/destroy/ee52203d-989f-4f7a-ab5a-2bef004164ca?dc=datacenter&ns=@!namespace"
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
Then the url should be /datacenter/kv/key/edit
ui: Show the correct message when a session has been removed from a KV (#6167)
2019-07-18 13:29:30 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "notification-deletesession" class
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "success" class
Scenario: Invalidating a lock session and receiving an error
ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests (#6980) * ui: Acceptance test improvements to prepare for more NS tests * ui: Namespace acceptance testing (#7005) * Update api-double and consul-api-double for http.body * Adds places where we missed passing the nspace through * Hardcode nspace CRUD to use the default nspace for policies and roles * Alter test helpers to allow us to control nspaces from the outside * Amends to allow tests to account for namespace, move ns from queryParam 1. We decided to move how we pass the namespace value through to the backend when performing write actions (create, update). Previoulsy we were using the queryParam although using the post body is the preferred method to send the Namespace details through to the backend. 2. Other various amends to take into account testing across multiple namespaced scenarios * Enable nspace testing by default * Remove last few occurances of old style http assertions We had informally 'deprecated' our old style of http assertions that relied on the order of http calls (even though that order was not important for the assertion). Following on from our namespace work we removed the majority of the old occrances of these old style assertions. This commit removes the remaining few, and also then cleans up the assertions/http.js file to only include the ones we are using. This reduces our available step count further and prevents any confusion over the usage of the old types and the new types. * ui: Namespace CRUD acceptance tests (#7016) * Upgrade consul-api-double * Add all the things required for testing: 1. edit and index page objects 2. enable CONSUL_NSPACE_COUNT cookie setting 3. enable mutating HTTP response bodies based on URL * Add acceptance test for nspace edit/delete/list and searching
2020-01-24 12:26:28 +00:00
Given the url "/v1/session/destroy/ee52203d-989f-4f7a-ab5a-2bef004164ca?dc=datacenter&ns=@!namespace" responds with a 500 status
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
And I click delete on the session
And I click confirmDelete on the session
Then the url should be /datacenter/kv/key/edit
ui: Show the correct message when a session has been removed from a KV (#6167)
2019-07-18 13:29:30 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "notification-deletesession" class
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "error" class