open-consul/build-support/scripts/protobuf.sh

151 lines
4.0 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env bash
readonly SCRIPT_NAME="$(basename ${BASH_SOURCE[0]})"
readonly SCRIPT_DIR="$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"
readonly SOURCE_DIR="$(dirname "$(dirname "${SCRIPT_DIR}")")"
readonly FN_DIR="$(dirname "${SCRIPT_DIR}")/functions"
source "${SCRIPT_DIR}/functions.sh"
unset CDPATH
set -euo pipefail
usage() {
cat <<-EOF
Usage: ${SCRIPT_NAME} [<options ...>]
Description:
Regenerates regenerates all Go files from protobuf definitions. In addition
to running the protoc generator it will also fixup build tags in the
generated code and regenerate mog outputs and RPC stubs.
Options:
-h | --help Print this help text.
EOF
}
function err_usage {
err "$1"
err ""
err "$(usage)"
}
function main {
while test $# -gt 0
do
case "$1" in
-h | --help )
usage
return 0
;;
esac
done
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
local mods=$(find . -name 'buf.gen.yaml' -exec dirname {} \; | sort)
for mod in $mods
do
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
status_stage "Generating protobuf module: $mod"
(
cd $mod
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
buf generate
for proto_file in $(buf ls-files)
do
postprocess_protobuf_code $proto_file
done
)
done
status "Generated all protobuf Go files"
generate_mog_code
status "Generated all mog Go files"
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
generate_rate_limit_mappings $mods
status "Generated gRPC rate limit mapping file"
return 0
}
function postprocess_protobuf_code {
local proto_path="${1:-}"
if [[ -z "${proto_path}" ]]; then
err "missing protobuf path argument"
return 1
fi
local proto_go_path="${proto_path%%.proto}.pb.go"
local proto_go_grpc_path="${proto_path%%.proto}_grpc.pb.go"
local proto_go_bin_path="${proto_path%%.proto}.pb.binary.go"
local proto_go_rpcglue_path="${proto_path%%.proto}.rpcglue.pb.go"
status_stage "Post-Processing generated files for ${proto_path}"
print_run protoc-go-inject-tag -input="${proto_go_path}" || {
err "Failed to run protoc-go-inject-tag for ${proto_path}"
return 1
}
local build_tags
build_tags="$(head -n 2 "${proto_path}" | grep '^//go:build\|// +build' || true)"
if test -n "${build_tags}"; then
for file in "${proto_go_path}" "${proto_go_bin_path}" "${proto_go_grpc_path}"
do
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
if test -f "${file}" -a "$(head -n 2 ${file})" != "${build_tags}"
then
echo "Adding build tags to ${file}"
echo -e "${build_tags}\n" >> "${file}.new"
cat "${file}" >> "${file}.new"
mv "${file}.new" "${file}"
fi
done
fi
# NOTE: this has to run after we fix up the build tags above
rm -f "${proto_go_rpcglue_path}"
print_run go run ${SOURCE_DIR}/internal/tools/proto-gen-rpc-glue/main.go -path "${proto_go_path}" || {
err "Failed to generate consul rpc glue outputs from ${proto_path}"
return 1
}
return 0
}
function generate_mog_code {
local mog_order
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mog_order="$(go list -tags "${GOTAGS}" -deps ./proto/private/pb... | grep "consul/proto/private")"
for FULL_PKG in ${mog_order}; do
PKG="${FULL_PKG/#github.com\/hashicorp\/consul\/}"
status_stage "Generating ${PKG}/*.pb.go into ${PKG}/*.gen.go with mog"
find "$PKG" -name '*.gen.go' -delete
if [[ -n "${GOTAGS}" ]]; then
print_run mog -tags "${GOTAGS}" -source "./${PKG}/*.pb.go"
else
print_run mog -source "./${PKG}/*.pb.go"
fi
done
return 0
}
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
function generate_rate_limit_mappings {
local flags=(
"-output ${SOURCE_DIR}/agent/grpc-middleware/rate_limit_mappings.gen.go"
)
for path in $@; do
flags+=("-input $path")
done
print_run go run ${SOURCE_DIR}/internal/tools/protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit/postprocess/main.go ${flags[@]} || {
err "Failed to generate gRPC rate limit mappings"
return 1
}
}
main "$@"
exit $?