luxolus
/
open-consul
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
open-consul/ui-v2/tests/acceptance/dc/services/instances/error.feature

17 lines
526 B
Gherkin
Raw Normal View History

UI: Add forking based on service instance id existence (#5392) * ui: Add forking based on service instance id existence Proxies come in 2 flavours, 'normal' and sidecar. We know when a proxy is a sidecar proxy based on whether a DestinationServiceID is set. LocalServiceAddress and LocalServicePort are only relevant for sidecar proxies. This adds template logic to show different text depending on this information. Additionally adds test around connect proxies (#5418) 1. Adds page object for the instance detail page 2. Adds further scenario steps used in the tests 3. Adds acceptance testing around the instance detail page. Services with proxies and the sidecar proxies and proxies themselves 4. Adds datacenter column for upstreams 5. Fixes bug routing bug for decision as to whether to request proxy information or not
2019-03-07 10:51:39 +00:00
@setupApplicationTest
Feature: dc / services / instances / error: Visit Service Instance what doesn't exist
Scenario: No instance can be found in the API response
Given 1 datacenter model with the value "dc1"
ui: Normal proxies link to services, sidecars to instances (#5944) * ui: Normal proxies line to services, sidecars to instances Following on from https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/pull/5933 we noticed that 'normal' proxies should link to the service, rather than the service instance. Additionally proxy 'searching' within the repository should take into account the name of the node that the originating service is on (sidecar proxies are generally co-located) Added an additional test here to prove that a sidecar-proxy with the same service id but on a different node does not show the sidecar proxy link.
2019-06-20 08:37:17 +00:00
And 1 instance model
UI: Add forking based on service instance id existence (#5392) * ui: Add forking based on service instance id existence Proxies come in 2 flavours, 'normal' and sidecar. We know when a proxy is a sidecar proxy based on whether a DestinationServiceID is set. LocalServiceAddress and LocalServicePort are only relevant for sidecar proxies. This adds template logic to show different text depending on this information. Additionally adds test around connect proxies (#5418) 1. Adds page object for the instance detail page 2. Adds further scenario steps used in the tests 3. Adds acceptance testing around the instance detail page. Services with proxies and the sidecar proxies and proxies themselves 4. Adds datacenter column for upstreams 5. Fixes bug routing bug for decision as to whether to request proxy information or not
2019-03-07 10:51:39 +00:00
When I visit the instance page for yaml
---
dc: dc1
service: service-0
ui: Ensure Service Instance pages account for nodes (#5933) Include node name in the URL for service instances Integrate the node name slug into tests for service instance pages
2019-06-11 09:18:50 +00:00
node: node-0
UI: Add forking based on service instance id existence (#5392) * ui: Add forking based on service instance id existence Proxies come in 2 flavours, 'normal' and sidecar. We know when a proxy is a sidecar proxy based on whether a DestinationServiceID is set. LocalServiceAddress and LocalServicePort are only relevant for sidecar proxies. This adds template logic to show different text depending on this information. Additionally adds test around connect proxies (#5418) 1. Adds page object for the instance detail page 2. Adds further scenario steps used in the tests 3. Adds acceptance testing around the instance detail page. Services with proxies and the sidecar proxies and proxies themselves 4. Adds datacenter column for upstreams 5. Fixes bug routing bug for decision as to whether to request proxy information or not
2019-03-07 10:51:39 +00:00
id: id-that-doesnt-exist
---
ui: Add tab navigation to the browser history/URLs (#7592) * ui: Add tab navigation to the browser history/URLs This commit changes all our tabbed UI interfaces in the catalog to use actual URL changes rather than only updating the content in the page using CSS. Originally we had decided not to add tab clicks into the browser history for a variety of reasons. As the UI has progressed these tabs are a fairly common pattern we are using and as the UI grows and stabilizes around certain UX patterns we've decided to make these tabs 'URL changing'. Pros: - Deeplinking - Potentially smaller Route files with a more concentrated scope of the contents of a tab rather than the entire page. - Tab clicks now go into your history meaning backwards and forwards buttons take you through the tabs not just the pages. - The majority of our partials are now fully fledged templates (Octane :tada:) Cons: - Tab clicks now go into your history meaning backwards and forwards buttons take you through the tabs not just the pages. (Could be good and bad from a UX perspective) - Many more Route and Controller files (yet as mentioned above each of these have a more reduced scope) - Moving around the contents of these tabs, or changing the visual names of them means updates to the URL structure, which then should potentially entail redirects, therefore what things that seem like straightforwards design reorganizations are now a little more impactful. It was getting to the point that the Pros outweight the Cons Apart from moving some files around we made a few more tiny tweaks to get this all working: - Our freetext-filter component now performs the initial search rather than this happening in the Controller (remove of the search method in the Controllers and the new didInsertElement hook in the component) - All of the <TabNav>'s were changed to use its alternative href approach. - <TabPanel>s usage was mostly removed. This is th thing I dislike the most. I think this needs removing, but I'd also like to remove the HTML it creates. You'll see that every new page is wrappe din the HTML for the old <TabPanel>, this is to continue to use the same HTML structure and id's as before to avoid making further changes to any CSS that might use this and being able to target things during testing. We could have also removed these here, but it would have meant a much larger changeset and can just as easily be done at a later date. - We made a new `tabgroup` page-object component, which is almost identical to the previous `radiogroup` one and injected that instead where needed during testing. * Make sure we pick up indexed routes when nspaces are enabled * Move session invalidation to the child (session) route * Revert back to not using didInsertElement for updating the searching This adds a way for the searchable to remember the last search result instead, which changes less and stick to the previous method of searching.
2020-04-08 09:56:36 +00:00
Then the url should be /dc1/services/service-0/instances/node-0/id-that-doesnt-exist
UI: Improved Login/Logout flow inc SSO support (#7790) * 6 new components for new login/logout flow, plus SSO support UI Components: 1. AuthDialog: Wraps/orchestrates AuthForm and AuthProfile 2. AuthForm: Authorization form shown when logged out. 3. AuthProfile: Simple presentational component to show the users 'Profile' 4. OidcSelect: A 'select' component for selecting an OIDC provider, dynamically uses either a single select menu or multiple buttons depending on the amount of providers Data Components: 1. JwtSource: Given an OIDC provider URL this component will request a token from the provider and fire an donchange event when it has been retrieved. Used by TokenSource. 2. TokenSource: Given a oidc provider name or a Consul SecretID, TokenSource will use whichever method/API requests required to retrieve Consul ACL Token, which is emitted to the onchange event handler. Very basic README documentation included here, which is likely to be refined somewhat. * CSS required for new auth/SSO UI components * Remaining app code required to tie the new auth/SSO work together * CSS code required to help tie the auth/SSO work together * Test code in order to get current tests passing with new auth/SSO flow ..plus extremely basics/skipped rendering tests for the new components * Treat the secret received from the server as the truth Previously we've always treated what the user typed as the truth, this breaks down when using SSO as the user doesn't type anything to retrieve a token. Therefore we change this so that we use the secret in the API response as the truth. * Make sure removing an dom tree from a buffer only removes its own tree
2020-05-11 15:37:11 +00:00
Then I see status on the error like "404"
UI: Add forking based on service instance id existence (#5392) * ui: Add forking based on service instance id existence Proxies come in 2 flavours, 'normal' and sidecar. We know when a proxy is a sidecar proxy based on whether a DestinationServiceID is set. LocalServiceAddress and LocalServicePort are only relevant for sidecar proxies. This adds template logic to show different text depending on this information. Additionally adds test around connect proxies (#5418) 1. Adds page object for the instance detail page 2. Adds further scenario steps used in the tests 3. Adds acceptance testing around the instance detail page. Services with proxies and the sidecar proxies and proxies themselves 4. Adds datacenter column for upstreams 5. Fixes bug routing bug for decision as to whether to request proxy information or not
2019-03-07 10:51:39 +00:00