luxolus
/
open-consul
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
open-consul/proto-public/pbacl/acl.pb.go

516 lines
18 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Copyright headers for missing files/folders (#16708) * copyright headers for agent folder
2023-03-28 22:48:58 +00:00
// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
// versions:
Various bits of cleanup detected when using Go Workspaces (#17462) TLDR with many modules the versions included in each diverged quite a bit. Attempting to use Go Workspaces produces a bunch of errors. This commit: 1. Fixes envoy-library-references.sh to work again 2. Ensures we are pulling in go-control-plane@v0.11.0 everywhere (previously it was at that version in some modules and others were much older) 3. Remove one usage of golang/protobuf that caused us to have a direct dependency on it. 4. Remove deprecated usage of the Endpoint field in the grpc resolver.Target struct. The current version of grpc (v1.55.0) has removed that field and recommended replacement with URL.Opaque and calls to the Endpoint() func when needing to consume the previous field. 4. `go work init <all the paths to go.mod files>` && `go work sync`. This syncrhonized versions of dependencies from the main workspace/root module to all submodules 5. Updated .gitignore to ignore the go.work and go.work.sum files. This seems to be standard practice at the moment. 6. Update doc comments in protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit to be go fmt compatible 7. Upgraded makefile infra to perform linting, testing and go mod tidy on all modules in a flexible manner. 8. Updated linter rules to prevent usage of golang/protobuf 9. Updated a leader peering test to account for an extra colon in a grpc error message.
2023-06-05 20:08:39 +00:00
// protoc-gen-go v1.30.0
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
// protoc (unknown)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
// source: pbacl/acl.proto
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
package pbacl
import (
grpc: `protoc` plugin for generating gRPC rate limit specifications (#15564) Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type` used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget to add new endpoints. Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so: ``` rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) { option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: READ, }; } ``` When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called `.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory). After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository, it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints. If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will return an error like so: ``` RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with: import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto"; service Bar { rpc Foo(...) returns (...) { option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = { operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT, }; } } ``` In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
2023-01-04 16:07:02 +00:00
_ "github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto-public/annotations/ratelimit"
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
reflect "reflect"
sync "sync"
)
const (
// Verify that this generated code is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(20 - protoimpl.MinVersion)
// Verify that runtime/protoimpl is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(protoimpl.MaxVersion - 20)
)
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
type LogoutResponse struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
}
func (x *LogoutResponse) Reset() {
*x = LogoutResponse{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[0]
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *LogoutResponse) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*LogoutResponse) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *LogoutResponse) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[0]
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use LogoutResponse.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*LogoutResponse) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
}
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
type LoginRequest struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// auth_method is the name of the configured auth method that will be used to
// validate the presented bearer token.
AuthMethod string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=auth_method,json=authMethod,proto3" json:"auth_method,omitempty"`
// bearer_token is a token produced by a trusted identity provider as
// configured by the auth method.
BearerToken string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=bearer_token,json=bearerToken,proto3" json:"bearer_token,omitempty"`
// meta is a collection of arbitrary key-value pairs associated to the token,
// it is useful for tracking the origin of tokens.
Meta map[string]string `protobuf:"bytes,3,rep,name=meta,proto3" json:"meta,omitempty" protobuf_key:"bytes,1,opt,name=key,proto3" protobuf_val:"bytes,2,opt,name=value,proto3"`
// namespace (enterprise only) is the namespace in which the auth method
// resides.
Namespace string `protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=namespace,proto3" json:"namespace,omitempty"`
// partition (enterprise only) is the partition in which the auth method
// resides.
Partition string `protobuf:"bytes,5,opt,name=partition,proto3" json:"partition,omitempty"`
// datacenter is the target datacenter in which the request will be processed.
Datacenter string `protobuf:"bytes,6,opt,name=datacenter,proto3" json:"datacenter,omitempty"`
}
func (x *LoginRequest) Reset() {
*x = LoginRequest{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[1]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *LoginRequest) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*LoginRequest) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *LoginRequest) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[1]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use LoginRequest.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*LoginRequest) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{1}
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
func (x *LoginRequest) GetAuthMethod() string {
if x != nil {
return x.AuthMethod
}
return ""
}
func (x *LoginRequest) GetBearerToken() string {
if x != nil {
return x.BearerToken
}
return ""
}
func (x *LoginRequest) GetMeta() map[string]string {
if x != nil {
return x.Meta
}
return nil
}
func (x *LoginRequest) GetNamespace() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Namespace
}
return ""
}
func (x *LoginRequest) GetPartition() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Partition
}
return ""
}
func (x *LoginRequest) GetDatacenter() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Datacenter
}
return ""
}
type LoginResponse struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// token is the generated ACL token.
Token *LoginToken `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=token,proto3" json:"token,omitempty"`
}
func (x *LoginResponse) Reset() {
*x = LoginResponse{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[2]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *LoginResponse) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*LoginResponse) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *LoginResponse) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[2]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use LoginResponse.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*LoginResponse) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{2}
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
func (x *LoginResponse) GetToken() *LoginToken {
if x != nil {
return x.Token
}
return nil
}
type LoginToken struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// accessor_id is a UUID used to identify the ACL token.
AccessorId string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=accessor_id,json=accessorId,proto3" json:"accessor_id,omitempty"`
// secret_id is a UUID presented as a credential by clients.
SecretId string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=secret_id,json=secretId,proto3" json:"secret_id,omitempty"`
}
func (x *LoginToken) Reset() {
*x = LoginToken{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[3]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *LoginToken) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*LoginToken) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *LoginToken) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[3]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use LoginToken.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*LoginToken) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{3}
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
func (x *LoginToken) GetAccessorId() string {
if x != nil {
return x.AccessorId
}
return ""
}
func (x *LoginToken) GetSecretId() string {
if x != nil {
return x.SecretId
}
return ""
}
type LogoutRequest struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// token is the ACL token's secret ID.
Token string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=token,proto3" json:"token,omitempty"`
// datacenter is the target datacenter in which the request will be processed.
Datacenter string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=datacenter,proto3" json:"datacenter,omitempty"`
}
func (x *LogoutRequest) Reset() {
*x = LogoutRequest{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[4]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *LogoutRequest) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*LogoutRequest) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *LogoutRequest) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
mi := &file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[4]
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use LogoutRequest.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*LogoutRequest) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{4}
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
func (x *LogoutRequest) GetToken() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Token
}
return ""
}
func (x *LogoutRequest) GetDatacenter() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Datacenter
}
return ""
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var File_pbacl_acl_proto protoreflect.FileDescriptor
var file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDesc = []byte{
0x0a, 0x0f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2f, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74,
0x6f, 0x12, 0x14, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e,
0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x1a, 0x25, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x61, 0x74,
0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2f, 0x72,
0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x22, 0x10,
0x0a, 0x0e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x74, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65,
0x22, 0xa9, 0x02, 0x0a, 0x0c, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73,
0x74, 0x12, 0x1f, 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x61, 0x75, 0x74, 0x68, 0x5f, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x68, 0x6f, 0x64,
0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0a, 0x61, 0x75, 0x74, 0x68, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x68,
0x6f, 0x64, 0x12, 0x21, 0x0a, 0x0c, 0x62, 0x65, 0x61, 0x72, 0x65, 0x72, 0x5f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x6b,
0x65, 0x6e, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0b, 0x62, 0x65, 0x61, 0x72, 0x65, 0x72,
0x54, 0x6f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x12, 0x40, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20,
0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x2c, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e,
0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72,
0x79, 0x52, 0x04, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x12, 0x1c, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x73,
0x70, 0x61, 0x63, 0x65, 0x18, 0x04, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x09, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65,
0x73, 0x70, 0x61, 0x63, 0x65, 0x12, 0x1c, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x70, 0x61, 0x72, 0x74, 0x69, 0x74, 0x69,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x18, 0x05, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x09, 0x70, 0x61, 0x72, 0x74, 0x69, 0x74,
0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61, 0x63, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65,
0x72, 0x18, 0x06, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0a, 0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61, 0x63, 0x65, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x1a, 0x37, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x45, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x72, 0x79,
0x12, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x03, 0x6b,
0x65, 0x79, 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28,
0x09, 0x52, 0x05, 0x76, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x75, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x02, 0x38, 0x01, 0x22, 0x47, 0x0a, 0x0d,
0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x12, 0x36, 0x0a,
0x05, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x20, 0x2e, 0x68,
0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e,
0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x54, 0x6f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x05,
0x74, 0x6f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x22, 0x4a, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x54, 0x6f,
0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x12, 0x1f, 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x61, 0x63, 0x63, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x5f,
0x69, 0x64, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0a, 0x61, 0x63, 0x63, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73,
0x6f, 0x72, 0x49, 0x64, 0x12, 0x1b, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x73, 0x65, 0x63, 0x72, 0x65, 0x74, 0x5f, 0x69,
0x64, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x08, 0x73, 0x65, 0x63, 0x72, 0x65, 0x74, 0x49,
0x64, 0x22, 0x45, 0x0a, 0x0d, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x74, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65,
0x73, 0x74, 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28,
0x09, 0x52, 0x05, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x12, 0x1e, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61,
0x63, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0a, 0x64, 0x61,
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
0x74, 0x61, 0x63, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x32, 0xc7, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x41, 0x43, 0x4c,
0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x12, 0x5a, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
0x12, 0x22, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e,
0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71,
0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x1a, 0x23, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70,
0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x69,
feat: add category annotation to RPC and gRPC methods (#16646)
2023-03-20 15:24:29 +00:00
0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x22, 0x08, 0xe2, 0x86, 0x04, 0x04, 0x08,
0x03, 0x10, 0x01, 0x12, 0x5d, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x74, 0x12, 0x23, 0x2e,
0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c,
0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x74, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65,
0x73, 0x74, 0x1a, 0x24, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x4c, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x74,
0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x22, 0x08, 0xe2, 0x86, 0x04, 0x04, 0x08, 0x03,
0x10, 0x01, 0x42, 0xc6, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x18, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x42,
0x08, 0x41, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x50, 0x01, 0x5a, 0x2e, 0x67, 0x69, 0x74,
0x68, 0x75, 0x62, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2f, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x2d, 0x70,
0x75, 0x62, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x63, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x61, 0x63, 0x6c, 0xa2, 0x02, 0x03, 0x48, 0x43,
0x41, 0xaa, 0x02, 0x14, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x41, 0x63, 0x6c, 0xca, 0x02, 0x14, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x41, 0x63, 0x6c, 0xe2,
0x02, 0x20, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73,
0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x41, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x47, 0x50, 0x42, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61, 0x64, 0x61,
0x74, 0x61, 0xea, 0x02, 0x16, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x3a, 0x3a,
0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x41, 0x63, 0x6c, 0x62, 0x06, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f,
0x74, 0x6f, 0x33,
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
var (
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescOnce sync.Once
file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescData = file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDesc
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
func file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescGZIP() []byte {
file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescOnce.Do(func() {
file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescData = protoimpl.X.CompressGZIP(file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescData)
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
})
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
return file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDescData
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes = make([]protoimpl.MessageInfo, 6)
var file_pbacl_acl_proto_goTypes = []interface{}{
Rename some protobuf package names to be fqdn like (#13861) These are used in various bits of the wire format (for gRPC) and internally with Go’s registry so we want to namespace things properly.
2022-07-22 18:59:34 +00:00
(*LogoutResponse)(nil), // 0: hashicorp.consul.acl.LogoutResponse
(*LoginRequest)(nil), // 1: hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginRequest
(*LoginResponse)(nil), // 2: hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginResponse
(*LoginToken)(nil), // 3: hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginToken
(*LogoutRequest)(nil), // 4: hashicorp.consul.acl.LogoutRequest
nil, // 5: hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginRequest.MetaEntry
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
var file_pbacl_acl_proto_depIdxs = []int32{
Rename some protobuf package names to be fqdn like (#13861) These are used in various bits of the wire format (for gRPC) and internally with Go’s registry so we want to namespace things properly.
2022-07-22 18:59:34 +00:00
5, // 0: hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginRequest.meta:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginRequest.MetaEntry
3, // 1: hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginResponse.token:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginToken
1, // 2: hashicorp.consul.acl.ACLService.Login:input_type -> hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginRequest
4, // 3: hashicorp.consul.acl.ACLService.Logout:input_type -> hashicorp.consul.acl.LogoutRequest
2, // 4: hashicorp.consul.acl.ACLService.Login:output_type -> hashicorp.consul.acl.LoginResponse
0, // 5: hashicorp.consul.acl.ACLService.Logout:output_type -> hashicorp.consul.acl.LogoutResponse
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
4, // [4:6] is the sub-list for method output_type
2, // [2:4] is the sub-list for method input_type
2, // [2:2] is the sub-list for extension type_name
2, // [2:2] is the sub-list for extension extendee
0, // [0:2] is the sub-list for field type_name
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
func init() { file_pbacl_acl_proto_init() }
func file_pbacl_acl_proto_init() {
if File_pbacl_acl_proto != nil {
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
return
}
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[0].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
switch v := v.(*LogoutResponse); i {
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[1].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
switch v := v.(*LoginRequest); i {
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[2].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
switch v := v.(*LoginResponse); i {
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[3].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
switch v := v.(*LoginToken); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes[4].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
switch v := v.(*LogoutRequest); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
}
type x struct{}
out := protoimpl.TypeBuilder{
File: protoimpl.DescBuilder{
GoPackagePath: reflect.TypeOf(x{}).PkgPath(),
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
RawDescriptor: file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDesc,
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
NumEnums: 0,
Migrate from `protoc` to `buf` (#12841) * Install `buf` instead of `protoc` * Created `buf.yaml` and `buf.gen.yaml` files in the two proto directories to control how `buf` generates/lints proto code. * Invoke `buf` instead of `protoc` * Added a `proto-format` make target. * Committed the reformatted proto files. * Added a `proto-lint` make target. * Integrated proto linting with CI * Fixed tons of proto linter warnings. * Got rid of deprecated builtin protoc-gen-go grpc plugin usage. Moved to direct usage of protoc-gen-go-grpc. * Unified all proto directories / go packages around using pb prefixes but ensuring all proto packages do not have the prefix.
2022-05-23 14:37:52 +00:00
NumMessages: 6,
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
NumExtensions: 0,
NumServices: 1,
},
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
GoTypes: file_pbacl_acl_proto_goTypes,
DependencyIndexes: file_pbacl_acl_proto_depIdxs,
MessageInfos: file_pbacl_acl_proto_msgTypes,
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}.Build()
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
File_pbacl_acl_proto = out.File
file_pbacl_acl_proto_rawDesc = nil
file_pbacl_acl_proto_goTypes = nil
file_pbacl_acl_proto_depIdxs = nil
acl: gRPC login and logout endpoints (#12935) Introduces two new public gRPC endpoints (`Login` and `Logout`) and includes refactoring of the equivalent net/rpc endpoints to enable the majority of logic to be reused (i.e. by extracting the `Binder` and `TokenWriter` types). This contains the OSS portions of the following enterprise commits: - 75fcdbfcfa6af21d7128cb2544829ead0b1df603 - bce14b714151af74a7f0110843d640204082630a - cc508b70fbf58eda144d9af3d71bd0f483985893
2022-05-04 16:38:45 +00:00
}