2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
package consul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
"os"
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
"reflect"
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
"strings"
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
"sync/atomic"
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
"testing"
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
"time"
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/acl"
|
2017-07-06 10:34:00 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs"
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil"
|
2019-03-27 12:54:56 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil/retry"
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
var testACLPolicy = `
|
|
|
|
key "" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
key "foo/" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
`
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
var testACLPolicyNew = `
|
|
|
|
key_prefix "" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
key_prefix "foo/" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
`
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
type asyncResolutionResult struct {
|
|
|
|
authz acl.Authorizer
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
func verifyAuthorizerChain(t *testing.T, expected acl.Authorizer, actual acl.Authorizer) {
|
|
|
|
expectedChainAuthz, ok := expected.(*acl.ChainedAuthorizer)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, ok, "expected Authorizer is not a ChainedAuthorizer")
|
|
|
|
actualChainAuthz, ok := actual.(*acl.ChainedAuthorizer)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, ok, "actual Authorizer is not a ChainedAuthorizer")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expectedChain := expectedChainAuthz.AuthorizerChain()
|
|
|
|
actualChain := actualChainAuthz.AuthorizerChain()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, len(expectedChain), len(actualChain), "ChainedAuthorizers have different length chains")
|
|
|
|
for idx, expectedAuthz := range expectedChain {
|
|
|
|
actualAuthz := actualChain[idx]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// pointer equality - because we want to verify authorizer reuse
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, expectedAuthz == actualAuthz, "Authorizer pointers are not equal")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func resolveTokenAsync(r *ACLResolver, token string, ch chan *asyncResolutionResult) {
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken(token)
|
|
|
|
ch <- &asyncResolutionResult{authz: authz, err: err}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func testIdentityForToken(token string) (bool, structs.ACLIdentity, error) {
|
|
|
|
switch token {
|
|
|
|
case "missing-policy":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-found",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
case "missing-role":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-found",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "missing-policy-on-role":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "missing-policy",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
case "legacy-management":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "d109a033-99d1-47e2-a711-d6593373a973",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "415cd1e1-1493-4fb4-827d-d762ed9cfe7c",
|
|
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeManagement,
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "legacy-client":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "b7375838-b104-4a25-b457-329d939bf257",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "03f49328-c23c-4b26-92a2-3b898332400d",
|
|
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
|
|
|
|
Rules: `service "" { policy = "read" }`,
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "found":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
case "found-role":
|
|
|
|
// This should be permission-wise identical to "found", except it
|
|
|
|
// gets it's policies indirectly by way of a Role.
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "found",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "found-policy-and-role":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
case "found-synthetic-policy-1":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "f6c5a5fb-4da4-422b-9abf-2c942813fc71",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "55cb7d69-2bea-42c3-a68f-2a1443d2abbc",
|
|
|
|
ServiceIdentities: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
&structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: "service1",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "found-synthetic-policy-2":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "7c87dfad-be37-446e-8305-299585677cb5",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "dfca9676-ac80-453a-837b-4c0cf923473c",
|
|
|
|
ServiceIdentities: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
&structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: "service2",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
case "acl-ro":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "acl-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
case "racey-unmodified":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "racey-modified":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
case "concurrent-resolve":
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
case anonymousToken:
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000002",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: anonymousToken,
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
default:
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return testIdentityForTokenEnterprise(token)
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func testPolicyForID(policyID string) (bool, *structs.ACLPolicy, error) {
|
|
|
|
switch policyID {
|
|
|
|
case "acl-ro":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
Name: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
Description: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
Rules: `acl = "read"`,
|
|
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "acl-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
Name: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
Description: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
Rules: `acl = "write"`,
|
|
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
case "service-ro":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
Name: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
Description: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
Rules: `service_prefix "" { policy = "read" }`,
|
|
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "service-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
Name: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
Description: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
Rules: `service_prefix "" { policy = "write" }`,
|
|
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
case "node-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
Name: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
Description: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
Rules: `node_prefix "" { policy = "write"}`,
|
|
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
|
|
Datacenters: []string{"dc1"},
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "dc2-key-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
|
|
Name: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
|
|
Description: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
|
|
Rules: `key_prefix "" { policy = "write"}`,
|
|
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
|
|
Datacenters: []string{"dc2"},
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
default:
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return testPolicyForIDEnterprise(policyID)
|
2014-08-12 17:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-12 17:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
func testRoleForID(roleID string) (bool, *structs.ACLRole, error) {
|
|
|
|
switch roleID {
|
|
|
|
case "service-ro":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
Name: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
Description: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "service-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
Name: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
Description: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "service-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "missing-policy":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "missing-policy",
|
|
|
|
Name: "missing-policy",
|
|
|
|
Description: "missing-policy",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-found",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "found":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "found",
|
|
|
|
Name: "found",
|
|
|
|
Description: "found",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "acl-ro":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
Name: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
Description: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "acl-wr":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-rw",
|
|
|
|
Name: "acl-rw",
|
|
|
|
Description: "acl-rw",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "racey-unmodified":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "racey-unmodified",
|
|
|
|
Name: "racey-unmodified",
|
|
|
|
Description: "racey-unmodified",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "racey-modified":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "racey-modified",
|
|
|
|
Name: "racey-modified",
|
|
|
|
Description: "racey-modified",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "concurrent-resolve-1":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "concurrent-resolve-1",
|
|
|
|
Name: "concurrent-resolve-1",
|
|
|
|
Description: "concurrent-resolve-1",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
case "concurrent-resolve-2":
|
|
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
|
|
ID: "concurrent-resolve-2",
|
|
|
|
Name: "concurrent-resolve-2",
|
|
|
|
Description: "concurrent-resolve-2",
|
|
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}, nil
|
|
|
|
default:
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return testRoleForIDEnterprise(roleID)
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// ACLResolverTestDelegate is used to test
|
|
|
|
// the ACLResolver without running Agents
|
|
|
|
type ACLResolverTestDelegate struct {
|
|
|
|
enabled bool
|
|
|
|
datacenter string
|
|
|
|
legacy bool
|
|
|
|
localTokens bool
|
|
|
|
localPolicies bool
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles bool
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
getPolicyFn func(*structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error
|
2018-10-31 20:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
tokenReadFn func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error
|
|
|
|
policyResolveFn func(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
roleResolveFn func(*structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// state for the optional default resolver function defaultTokenReadFn
|
|
|
|
tokenCached bool
|
|
|
|
// state for the optional default resolver function defaultPolicyResolveFn
|
|
|
|
policyCached bool
|
|
|
|
// state for the optional default resolver function defaultRoleResolveFn
|
|
|
|
roleCached bool
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EnterpriseACLResolverTestDelegate
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) Reset() {
|
|
|
|
d.tokenCached = false
|
|
|
|
d.policyCached = false
|
|
|
|
d.roleCached = false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
var errRPC = fmt.Errorf("Induced RPC Error")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) defaultTokenReadFn(errAfterCached error) func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
return func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !d.tokenCached {
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
err := d.plainTokenReadFn(args, reply)
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
d.tokenCached = true
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
return err
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return errAfterCached
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) plainTokenReadFn(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
_, token, err := testIdentityForToken(args.TokenID)
|
|
|
|
if token != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) defaultPolicyResolveFn(errAfterCached error) func(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
return func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !d.policyCached {
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
err := d.plainPolicyResolveFn(args, reply)
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
d.policyCached = true
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
return err
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return errAfterCached
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) plainPolicyResolveFn(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
// TODO: if we were being super correct about it, we'd verify the token first
|
|
|
|
// TODO: and possibly return a not-found or permission-denied here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) defaultRoleResolveFn(errAfterCached error) func(*structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
return func(args *structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !d.roleCached {
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
err := d.plainRoleResolveFn(args, reply)
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
d.roleCached = true
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
return err
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return errAfterCached
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-12 17:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
// plainRoleResolveFn tries to follow the normal logic of ACL.RoleResolve using
|
|
|
|
// the test fixtures.
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) plainRoleResolveFn(args *structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
// TODO: if we were being super correct about it, we'd verify the token first
|
|
|
|
// TODO: and possibly return a not-found or permission-denied here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, roleID := range args.RoleIDs {
|
|
|
|
_, role, _ := testRoleForID(roleID)
|
|
|
|
if role != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Roles = append(reply.Roles, role)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ACLsEnabled() bool {
|
|
|
|
return d.enabled
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ACLDatacenter(legacy bool) string {
|
|
|
|
return d.datacenter
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) UseLegacyACLs() bool {
|
|
|
|
return d.legacy
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ResolveIdentityFromToken(token string) (bool, structs.ACLIdentity, error) {
|
|
|
|
if !d.localTokens {
|
|
|
|
return false, nil, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return testIdentityForToken(token)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ResolvePolicyFromID(policyID string) (bool, *structs.ACLPolicy, error) {
|
|
|
|
if !d.localPolicies {
|
|
|
|
return false, nil, nil
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
return testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ResolveRoleFromID(roleID string) (bool, *structs.ACLRole, error) {
|
|
|
|
if !d.localRoles {
|
|
|
|
return false, nil, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return testRoleForID(roleID)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) RPC(method string, args interface{}, reply interface{}) error {
|
|
|
|
switch method {
|
|
|
|
case "ACL.GetPolicy":
|
|
|
|
if d.getPolicyFn != nil {
|
|
|
|
return d.getPolicyFn(args.(*structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse))
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a getPolicyFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
case "ACL.TokenRead":
|
|
|
|
if d.tokenReadFn != nil {
|
2018-10-31 20:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return d.tokenReadFn(args.(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLTokenResponse))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a tokenReadFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
case "ACL.PolicyResolve":
|
|
|
|
if d.policyResolveFn != nil {
|
2018-10-31 20:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return d.policyResolveFn(args.(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a policyResolveFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
|
|
|
case "ACL.RoleResolve":
|
|
|
|
if d.roleResolveFn != nil {
|
|
|
|
return d.roleResolveFn(args.(*structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a roleResolveFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if handled, err := d.EnterpriseACLResolverTestDelegate.RPC(method, args, reply); handled {
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: Was the ACLResolver updated to use new RPC methods")
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func newTestACLResolver(t *testing.T, delegate ACLResolverDelegate, cb func(*ACLResolverConfig)) *ACLResolver {
|
|
|
|
config := DefaultConfig()
|
|
|
|
config.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
rconf := &ACLResolverConfig{
|
|
|
|
Config: config,
|
2020-01-28 23:50:41 +00:00
|
|
|
Logger: testutil.LoggerWithName(t, t.Name()),
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
CacheConfig: &structs.ACLCachesConfig{
|
|
|
|
Identities: 4,
|
|
|
|
Policies: 4,
|
|
|
|
ParsedPolicies: 4,
|
|
|
|
Authorizers: 4,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
Roles: 4,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
AutoDisable: true,
|
|
|
|
Delegate: delegate,
|
2014-08-11 21:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if cb != nil {
|
|
|
|
cb(rconf)
|
2014-08-11 21:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resolver, err := NewACLResolver(rconf)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
return resolver
|
2014-08-11 21:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Disabled(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2014-08-11 21:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: false,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
2014-08-11 21:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("does not exist")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, err)
|
2014-08-11 21:54:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_ResolveRootACL(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("allow")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrRootDenied(err))
|
2014-08-12 17:38:57 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("deny")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrRootDenied(err))
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-12 17:38:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Manage", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("manage")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrRootDenied(err))
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-12 17:38:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached := func(t *testing.T, r *ACLResolver, id string, present bool, msg string) {
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
cacheVal := r.cache.GetIdentity(id)
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal)
|
|
|
|
if present {
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal.Identity, msg)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, cacheVal.Identity, msg)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached := func(t *testing.T, r *ACLResolver, policyID string, present bool, msg string) {
|
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cacheVal := r.cache.GetPolicy(policyID)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal)
|
|
|
|
if present {
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal.Policy, msg)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, cacheVal.Policy, msg)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-31 20:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return errRPC
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, authz, acl.DenyAll())
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("foo"), false, "not present")
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-31 20:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return errRPC
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "allow"
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, authz, acl.AllowAll())
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("foo"), false, "not present")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// policy cache expired - so we will fail to resolve that policy and use the default policy only
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
require.NotEqual(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", false, "expired") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", false, "expired") // from "found" token
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Expired-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// role cache expired - so we will fail to resolve that role and use the default policy only
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
|
|
require.False(t, authz == authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found"), true, "cached")
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found-role"), true, "still cached")
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// Will just use the policy cache
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Expired-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(errRPC)
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Will just use the policy cache
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Async-Cache-Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
// We don't need to return acl.ErrNotFound here but we could. The ACLResolver will search for any
|
|
|
|
// policies not in the response and emit an ACL not found for any not-found within the result set.
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(nil)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return with a authz that doesn't have the policy
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, authz3)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz3.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", false, "no longer cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", false, "no longer cached") // from "found" token
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Async-Cache-Expired-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We don't need to return acl.ErrNotFound here but we could. The ACLResolver will search for any
|
|
|
|
// policies not in the response and emit an ACL not found for any not-found within the result set.
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(nil)
|
|
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(nil)
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return with a authz that doesn't have the policy
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, authz3)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz3.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Client-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Client-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Async-Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(acl.ErrNotFound)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found"), true, "cached")
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
2019-10-25 15:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return and this will be a not found error
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
|
|
assert.Nil(t, authz3)
|
|
|
|
})
|
2019-03-12 15:23:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found"), false, "no longer cached")
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("PolicyResolve-TokenNotFound", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_, rawToken, _ := testIdentityForToken("found")
|
|
|
|
foundToken := rawToken.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
|
|
secretID := foundToken.SecretID
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tokenResolved := false
|
|
|
|
policyResolved := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !tokenResolved {
|
|
|
|
reply.Token = foundToken
|
|
|
|
tokenResolved = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Not Supposed to be Invoked again")
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !policyResolved {
|
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
policyResolved = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound // test condition
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Prime the standard caches.
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the caches are setup properly.
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID(secretID), true, "cached")
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Nuke 1 policy from the cache so that we force a policy resolve
|
|
|
|
// during token resolve.
|
|
|
|
r.cache.RemovePolicy("dc2-key-wr")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_, err = r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID(secretID), false, "identity not found cached")
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, r.cache.GetPolicy("dc2-key-wr"), "not stored at all")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("PolicyResolve-PermissionDenied", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_, rawToken, _ := testIdentityForToken("found")
|
|
|
|
foundToken := rawToken.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
|
|
secretID := foundToken.SecretID
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policyResolved := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
// no limit
|
|
|
|
reply.Token = foundToken
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !policyResolved {
|
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
policyResolved = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrPermissionDenied // test condition
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Prime the standard caches.
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the caches are setup properly.
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID(secretID), true, "cached")
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Nuke 1 policy from the cache so that we force a policy resolve
|
|
|
|
// during token resolve.
|
|
|
|
r.cache.RemovePolicy("dc2-key-wr")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_, err = r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err))
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-25 17:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, r.cache.GetIdentity(tokenSecretCacheID(secretID)), "identity not stored at all")
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, r.cache.GetPolicy("dc2-key-wr"), "not stored at all")
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_DatacenterScoping(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("dc1", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.KeyWrite("foo", nil))
|
2014-08-12 17:54:56 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("dc2", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc2",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.Datacenter = "dc2"
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-12 17:54:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.KeyWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-12 17:54:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
// TODO(rb): replicate this sort of test but for roles
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Client(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Racey-Token-Mod-Policy-Resolve", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
var tokenReads int32
|
|
|
|
var policyResolves int32
|
|
|
|
modified := false
|
|
|
|
deleted := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&tokenReads, 1)
|
|
|
|
if deleted {
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
|
|
} else if modified {
|
|
|
|
_, token, _ := testIdentityForToken("racey-modified")
|
|
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
_, token, _ := testIdentityForToken("racey-unmodified")
|
|
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&policyResolves, 1)
|
|
|
|
if deleted {
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
|
|
} else if !modified {
|
|
|
|
modified = true
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrPermissionDenied
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
deleted = true
|
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
modified = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 600 * time.Second
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// resolves the token
|
|
|
|
// gets a permission denied resolving the policies - token updated
|
|
|
|
// invalidates the token
|
|
|
|
// refetches the token
|
|
|
|
// fetches the policies from the modified token
|
|
|
|
// creates the authorizers
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Must use the token secret here in order for the cached identity
|
|
|
|
// to be removed properly. Many other tests just resolve some other
|
|
|
|
// random name and it wont matter but this one cannot.
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
require.True(t, modified)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, deleted)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(2), tokenReads)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(2), policyResolves)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// sleep long enough for the policy cache to expire
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// this round the identity will be resolved from the cache
|
|
|
|
// then the policy will be resolved but resolution will return ACL not found
|
|
|
|
// resolution will stop with the not found error (even though we still have the
|
|
|
|
// policies within the cache)
|
|
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835")
|
|
|
|
require.EqualError(t, err, acl.ErrNotFound.Error())
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, modified)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, deleted)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, tokenReads, int32(2))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, policyResolves, int32(3))
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Concurrent-Token-Resolve", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var tokenReads int32
|
|
|
|
var policyResolves int32
|
|
|
|
readyCh := make(chan struct{})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&tokenReads, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch args.TokenID {
|
|
|
|
case "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835":
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
_, token, _ := testIdentityForToken("concurrent-resolve")
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-readyCh:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&policyResolves, 1)
|
2019-03-14 14:35:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
// effectively disable caching - so the only way we end up with 1 token read is if they were
|
|
|
|
// being resolved concurrently
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0 * time.Second
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
2019-01-22 18:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ch1 := make(chan *asyncResolutionResult)
|
|
|
|
ch2 := make(chan *asyncResolutionResult)
|
|
|
|
go resolveTokenAsync(r, "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835", ch1)
|
|
|
|
go resolveTokenAsync(r, "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835", ch2)
|
|
|
|
close(readyCh)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
res1 := <-ch1
|
|
|
|
res2 := <-ch2
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, res1.err)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, res2.err)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, res1.authz, res2.authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(1), tokenReads)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(1), policyResolves)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Client_TokensPoliciesAndRoles(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.plainTokenReadFn
|
|
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.plainPolicyResolveFn
|
|
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.plainRoleResolveFn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testACLResolver_variousTokens(t, delegate)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_LocalTokensPoliciesAndRoles(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
testACLResolver_variousTokens(t, delegate)
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_LocalPoliciesAndRoles(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.plainTokenReadFn
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testACLResolver_variousTokens(t, delegate)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func testACLResolver_variousTokens(t *testing.T, delegate *ACLResolverTestDelegate) {
|
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 600 * time.Second
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
reset := func() {
|
|
|
|
// prevent subtest bleedover
|
|
|
|
r.cache.Purge()
|
|
|
|
delegate.Reset()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset := func(name string, f func(t *testing.T)) {
|
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
defer reset() // reset the stateful resolve AND blow away the cache
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run(name+" (no-cache)", f)
|
|
|
|
delegate.Reset() // allow the stateful resolve functions to reset
|
|
|
|
t.Run(name+" (cached)", f)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Identity", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("doesn't exist")
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("missing-policy")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("missing-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Policy on Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("missing-policy-on-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Normal with Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Normal with Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Normal with Policy and Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-policy-and-role")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("bar", nil))
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Synthetic Policies Independently Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// We resolve both of these tokens in the same cache session
|
|
|
|
// to verify that the keys for caching synthetic policies don't bleed
|
|
|
|
// over between each other.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-synthetic-policy-1")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// spot check some random perms
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
// ensure we didn't bleed over to the other synthetic policy
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ServiceWrite("service2", nil))
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
// check our own synthetic policy
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceWrite("service1", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("literally-anything", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeRead("any-node", nil))
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-synthetic-policy-2")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// spot check some random perms
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
// ensure we didn't bleed over to the other synthetic policy
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ServiceWrite("service1", nil))
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
// check our own synthetic policy
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceWrite("service2", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("literally-anything", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeRead("any-node", nil))
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Anonymous", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("legacy-management", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("legacy-management")
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLWrite(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.KeyRead("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-26 17:49:28 +00:00
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("legacy-client", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("legacy-client")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.OperatorRead(nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("foo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Legacy(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Cached", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
cached := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
|
|
reply.TTL = 30
|
|
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
&acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cached = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return errRPC
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Extend", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
cached := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
&acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cached = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return errRPC
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
cached := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
&acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cached = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return errRPC
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "allow"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
cached := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
&acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cached = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-15 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return errRPC
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Async-Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
cached := false
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
&acl.NodeRule{
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cached = true
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-07-01 10:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// delivered from the cache
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return and this will be a not found error
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
|
|
assert.Nil(t, authz3)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_Replication(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
aclExtendPolicies := []string{"extend-cache", "async-cache"} //"async-cache"
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
for _, aclDownPolicy := range aclExtendPolicies {
|
|
|
|
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
client := rpcClient(t, s1)
|
|
|
|
defer client.Close()
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
dir2, s2 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc2"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDownPolicy = aclDownPolicy
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ACLTokenReplication = true
|
|
|
|
c.ACLReplicationRate = 100
|
|
|
|
c.ACLReplicationBurst = 100
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ACLReplicationApplyLimit = 1000000
|
|
|
|
})
|
2019-02-27 19:28:31 +00:00
|
|
|
s2.tokens.UpdateReplicationToken("root")
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir2)
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
dir3, s3 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc3"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ACLTokenReplication = true
|
|
|
|
c.ACLReplicationRate = 100
|
|
|
|
c.ACLReplicationBurst = 100
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ACLReplicationApplyLimit = 1000000
|
|
|
|
})
|
2019-02-27 19:28:31 +00:00
|
|
|
s3.tokens.UpdateReplicationToken("root")
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir3)
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try to join.
|
|
|
|
joinWAN(t, s2, s1)
|
|
|
|
joinWAN(t, s3, s1)
|
|
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
|
|
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc2")
|
|
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc3")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a new token.
|
|
|
|
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
|
|
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
Op: structs.ACLSet,
|
|
|
|
ACL: structs.ACL{
|
|
|
|
Name: "User token",
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Rules: testACLPolicy,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
var id string
|
|
|
|
if err := s1.RPC("ACL.Apply", &arg, &id); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// Wait for replication to occur.
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
_, acl, err := s2.fsm.State().ACLTokenGetBySecret(nil, id)
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatal(nil)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
_, acl, err = s3.fsm.State().ACLTokenGetBySecret(nil, id)
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatal(nil)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill the ACL datacenter.
|
|
|
|
s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Token should resolve on s2, which has replication + extend-cache.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
acl, err := s2.ResolveToken(id)
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("missing acl")
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// Check the policy
|
|
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("bar") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !acl.KeyRead("foo/test") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected failed read")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// Although s3 has replication, and we verified that the ACL is there,
|
|
|
|
// it can not be used because of the down policy.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
acl, err = s3.ResolveToken(id)
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("missing acl")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-01 18:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// Check the policy.
|
|
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("bar") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("foo/test") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-05 00:59:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_MultiDC_Found(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-27 13:22:18 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
2014-08-12 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
client := rpcClient(t, s1)
|
|
|
|
defer client.Close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dir2, s2 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc2"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1" // Enable ACLs!
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir2)
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try to join
|
2017-05-05 10:29:49 +00:00
|
|
|
joinWAN(t, s2, s1)
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-04-19 23:00:11 +00:00
|
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
|
|
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc2")
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a new token
|
|
|
|
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
|
|
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
Op: structs.ACLSet,
|
|
|
|
ACL: structs.ACL{
|
|
|
|
Name: "User token",
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
Rules: testACLPolicy,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2014-08-12 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var id string
|
2015-10-13 23:43:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err := s1.RPC("ACL.Apply", &arg, &id); err != nil {
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Token should resolve
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
acl, err := s2.ResolveToken(id)
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("missing acl")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check the policy
|
|
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("bar") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !acl.KeyRead("foo/test") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected failed read")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-08-11 21:18:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterHealthChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create some health checks.
|
|
|
|
fill := func() structs.HealthChecks {
|
|
|
|
return structs.HealthChecks{
|
|
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hc := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
|
|
if len(hc) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hc := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
|
|
if len(hc) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This will work because version 8 ACLs aren't being enforced.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hc := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
|
|
if len(hc) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// But with version 8 the node will block it.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hc := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
|
|
if len(hc) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hc := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
|
|
if len(hc) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterIntentions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
assert := assert.New(t)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
fill := func() structs.Intentions {
|
|
|
|
return structs.Intentions{
|
|
|
|
&structs.Intention{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
|
|
DestinationName: "bar",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.Intention{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d2",
|
|
|
|
DestinationName: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ixns := fill()
|
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
|
|
|
filt.filterIntentions(&ixns)
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Len(ixns, 2)
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ixns := fill()
|
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
|
|
|
filt.filterIntentions(&ixns)
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Len(ixns, 0)
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Policy to see one
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Nil(err)
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Nil(err)
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Filter
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ixns := fill()
|
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, false)
|
|
|
|
filt.filterIntentions(&ixns)
|
2018-03-06 18:51:26 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Len(ixns, 1)
|
2018-03-05 02:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterServices(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create some services
|
|
|
|
services := structs.Services{
|
|
|
|
"service1": []string{},
|
|
|
|
"service2": []string{},
|
2017-03-23 23:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
"consul": []string{},
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-23 23:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2019-12-10 02:26:41 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServices(services, nil)
|
2017-03-23 23:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
if len(services) != 3 {
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-23 23:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2019-12-10 02:26:41 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServices(services, nil)
|
2017-03-23 23:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
if len(services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := services["consul"]; !ok {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering with version 8 enforcement.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, true)
|
2019-12-10 02:26:41 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServices(services, nil)
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
if len(services) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterServiceNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create some service nodes.
|
|
|
|
fill := func() structs.ServiceNodes {
|
|
|
|
return structs.ServiceNodes{
|
|
|
|
&structs.ServiceNode{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// This will work because version 8 ACLs aren't being enforced.
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, false)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// But with version 8 the node will block it.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-11 21:22:14 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterNodeServices(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create some node services.
|
|
|
|
fill := func() *structs.NodeServices {
|
|
|
|
return &structs.NodeServices{
|
|
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
Services: map[string]*structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
"foo": &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try nil, which is a possible input.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var services *structs.NodeServices
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
|
|
if services != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
services := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
|
|
if len(services.Services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services.Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
services := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
|
|
if len((*services).Services) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", (*services).Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This will work because version 8 ACLs aren't being enforced.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
services := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
|
|
if len((*services).Services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", (*services).Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// But with version 8 the node will block it.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
services := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
|
|
if services != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
services := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 00:53:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
|
|
if len((*services).Services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", (*services).Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterCheckServiceNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create some nodes.
|
|
|
|
fill := func() structs.CheckServiceNodes {
|
|
|
|
return structs.CheckServiceNodes{
|
|
|
|
structs.CheckServiceNode{
|
|
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
|
|
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This will work because version 8 ACLs aren't being enforced.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// But with version 8 the node will block it.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 00:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-12 19:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterCoordinates(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-12 19:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create some coordinates.
|
|
|
|
coords := structs.Coordinates{
|
|
|
|
&structs.Coordinate{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
Coord: generateRandomCoordinate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.Coordinate{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node2",
|
|
|
|
Coord: generateRandomCoordinate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-12 19:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCoordinates(&coords)
|
|
|
|
if len(coords) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", coords)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering without version 8 ACL enforcement.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-12 19:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCoordinates(&coords)
|
|
|
|
if len(coords) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", coords)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering with version 8 ACL enforcement.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, true)
|
2016-12-12 19:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterCoordinates(&coords)
|
|
|
|
if len(coords) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", coords)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 05:59:22 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterSessions(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-13 05:59:22 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create a session list.
|
|
|
|
sessions := structs.Sessions{
|
|
|
|
&structs.Session{
|
|
|
|
Node: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.Session{
|
|
|
|
Node: "bar",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 05:59:22 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterSessions(&sessions)
|
|
|
|
if len(sessions) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", sessions)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering but with version 8 enforcement turned off.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 05:59:22 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterSessions(&sessions)
|
|
|
|
if len(sessions) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", sessions)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering with version 8 enforcement turned on.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 05:59:22 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterSessions(&sessions)
|
|
|
|
if len(sessions) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", sessions)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterNodeDump(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create a node dump.
|
|
|
|
fill := func() structs.NodeDump {
|
|
|
|
return structs.NodeDump{
|
|
|
|
&structs.NodeInfo{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
Services: []*structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
&structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
dump := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
|
|
if len(dump) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
dump := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
|
|
if len(dump) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Services) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Checks) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This will work because version 8 ACLs aren't being enforced.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
dump := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, false)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
|
|
if len(dump) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// But with version 8 the node will block it.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
dump := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
|
|
if len(dump) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
dump := fill()
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil, true)
|
2016-12-13 02:21:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
|
|
if len(dump) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Services) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Services)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(dump[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Checks)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-11 21:14:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-11 00:00:11 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-11 00:00:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create a nodes list.
|
|
|
|
nodes := structs.Nodes{
|
|
|
|
&structs.Node{
|
|
|
|
Node: "foo",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.Node{
|
|
|
|
Node: "bar",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, true)
|
2016-12-11 00:00:11 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering but with version 8 enforcement turned off.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-12-11 00:00:11 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering with version 8 enforcement turned on.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, true)
|
2016-12-11 00:00:11 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterNodes(&nodes)
|
|
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-26 23:59:00 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_redactPreparedQueryTokens(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-02-26 23:59:00 +00:00
|
|
|
query := &structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected := &structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering with a management token. This will allow the
|
|
|
|
// embedded token to be seen.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.ManageAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-02-26 23:59:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.redactPreparedQueryTokens(&query)
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query, expected) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", &query)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Hang on to the entry with a token, which needs to survive the next
|
|
|
|
// operation.
|
|
|
|
original := query
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now try permissive filtering with a client token, which should cause
|
|
|
|
// the embedded token to get redacted.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
2016-02-26 23:59:00 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.redactPreparedQueryTokens(&query)
|
|
|
|
expected.Token = redactedToken
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query, expected) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", *query)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the original object didn't lose its token.
|
|
|
|
if original.Token != "root" {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad token: %s", original.Token)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_redactTokenSecret(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
token := &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err := r.filterACL("acl-wr", &token)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1", token.SecretID)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = r.filterACL("acl-ro", &token)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, redactedToken, token.SecretID)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_redactTokenSecrets(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tokens := structs.ACLTokens{
|
|
|
|
&structs.ACLToken{
|
|
|
|
AccessorID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
|
|
SecretID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err := r.filterACL("acl-wr", &tokens)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1", tokens[0].SecretID)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = r.filterACL("acl-ro", &tokens)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, redactedToken, tokens[0].SecretID)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterPreparedQueries(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
queries := structs.PreparedQueries{
|
|
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
2016-02-24 09:26:16 +00:00
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d2",
|
|
|
|
Name: "query-with-no-token",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d3",
|
|
|
|
Name: "query-with-a-token",
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected := structs.PreparedQueries{
|
|
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
2016-02-24 09:26:16 +00:00
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d2",
|
|
|
|
Name: "query-with-no-token",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d3",
|
|
|
|
Name: "query-with-a-token",
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering with a management token. This will allow the
|
2016-02-24 09:26:16 +00:00
|
|
|
// embedded token to be seen.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.ManageAll(), nil, false)
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterPreparedQueries(&queries)
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(queries, expected) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", queries)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Hang on to the entry with a token, which needs to survive the next
|
|
|
|
// operation.
|
2016-02-24 09:26:16 +00:00
|
|
|
original := queries[2]
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now try permissive filtering with a client token, which should cause
|
2016-02-24 09:26:16 +00:00
|
|
|
// the embedded token to get redacted, and the query with no name to get
|
|
|
|
// filtered out.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil, false)
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterPreparedQueries(&queries)
|
2016-02-24 09:26:16 +00:00
|
|
|
expected[2].Token = redactedToken
|
|
|
|
expected = append(structs.PreparedQueries{}, expected[1], expected[2])
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(queries, expected) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", queries)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the original object didn't lose its token.
|
|
|
|
if original.Token != "root" {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad token: %s", original.Token)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now try restrictive filtering.
|
2017-04-21 00:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil, false)
|
Creates new "prepared-query" ACL type and new token capture behavior.
Prior to this change, prepared queries had the following behavior for
ACLs, which will need to change to support templates:
1. A management token, or a token with read access to the service being
queried needed to be provided in order to create a prepared query.
2. The token used to create the prepared query was stored with the query
in the state store and used to execute the query.
3. A management token, or the token used to create the query needed to be
supplied to perform and CRUD operations on an existing prepared query.
This was pretty subtle and complicated behavior, and won't work for
templates since the service name is computed at execution time. To solve
this, we introduce a new "prepared-query" ACL type, where the prefix
applies to the query name for static prepared query types and to the
prefix for template prepared query types.
With this change, the new behavior is:
1. A management token, or a token with "prepared-query" write access to
the query name or (soon) the given template prefix is required to do
any CRUD operations on a prepared query, or to list prepared queries
(the list is filtered by this ACL).
2. You will no longer need a management token to list prepared queries,
but you will only be able to see prepared queries that you have access
to (you get an empty list instead of permission denied).
3. When listing or getting a query, because it was easy to capture
management tokens given the past behavior, this will always blank out
the "Token" field (replacing the contents as <hidden>) for all tokens
unless a management token is supplied. Going forward, we should
discourage people from binding tokens for execution unless strictly
necessary.
4. No token will be captured by default when a prepared query is created.
If the user wishes to supply an execution token then can pass it in via
the "Token" field in the prepared query definition. Otherwise, this
field will default to empty.
5. At execution time, we will use the captured token if it exists with the
prepared query definition, otherwise we will use the token that's passed
in with the request, just like we do for other RPCs (or you can use the
agent's configured token for DNS).
6. Prepared queries with no name (accessible only by ID) will not require
ACLs to create or modify (execution time will depend on the service ACL
configuration). Our argument here is that these are designed to be
ephemeral and the IDs are as good as an ACL. Management tokens will be
able to list all of these.
These changes enable templates, but also enable delegation of authority to
manage the prepared query namespace.
2016-02-23 08:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
filt.filterPreparedQueries(&queries)
|
|
|
|
if len(queries) != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", queries)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-11 23:46:15 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_unhandledFilterType(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2015-06-11 23:46:15 +00:00
|
|
|
defer func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
if recover() == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should panic")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}(t)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the server
|
|
|
|
dir, token, srv, client := testACLFilterServer(t)
|
|
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
|
|
|
|
defer srv.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
defer client.Close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pass an unhandled type into the ACL filter.
|
|
|
|
srv.filterACL(token, &structs.HealthCheck{})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestACL_vetRegisterWithACL(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
args := &structs.RegisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
Address: "127.0.0.1",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With a nil ACL, the update should be allowed.
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(nil, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a basic node policy.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With that policy, the update should now be blocked for node reasons.
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil)
|
2017-08-23 14:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now use a permitted node name.
|
|
|
|
args.Node = "node"
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build some node info that matches what we have now.
|
|
|
|
ns := &structs.NodeServices{
|
|
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
Address: "127.0.0.1",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Services: make(map[string]*structs.NodeService),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try to register a service, which should be blocked.
|
|
|
|
args.Service = &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "service",
|
|
|
|
ID: "my-id",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
2017-08-23 14:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a basic service policy.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
service "service" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the service ACL, the update should go through.
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add an existing service that they are clobbering and aren't allowed
|
|
|
|
// to write to.
|
|
|
|
ns.Services["my-id"] = &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "other",
|
|
|
|
ID: "my-id",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
2017-08-23 14:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a policy that allows them to write to the other service.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
service "other" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try creating the node and the service at once by having no existing
|
|
|
|
// node record. This should be ok since we have node and service
|
|
|
|
// permissions.
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add a node-level check to the member, which should be rejected.
|
|
|
|
args.Check = &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
|
|
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "check member must be nil") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Move the check into the slice, but give a bad node name.
|
|
|
|
args.Check.Node = "nope"
|
|
|
|
args.Checks = append(args.Checks, args.Check)
|
|
|
|
args.Check = nil
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
|
|
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "doesn't match register request node") {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Fix the node name, which should now go through.
|
|
|
|
args.Checks[0].Node = "node"
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add a service-level check.
|
|
|
|
args.Checks = append(args.Checks, &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-id",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try creating everything at once. This should be ok since we have all
|
|
|
|
// the permissions we need. It also makes sure that we can register a
|
|
|
|
// new node, service, and associated checks.
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Nil out the service registration, which'll skip the special case
|
|
|
|
// and force us to look at the ns data (it will look like we are
|
|
|
|
// writing to the "other" service which also has "my-id").
|
|
|
|
args.Service = nil
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a policy that forbids them to write to the other service.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
service "other" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This should get rejected.
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
2017-08-23 14:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Change the existing service data to point to a service name they
|
|
|
|
// car write to. This should go through.
|
|
|
|
ns.Services["my-id"] = &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "service",
|
|
|
|
ID: "my-id",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a policy that forbids them to write to the node.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This should get rejected because there's a node-level check in here.
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
2017-08-23 14:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Change the node-level check into a service check, and then it should
|
|
|
|
// go through.
|
|
|
|
args.Checks[0].ServiceID = "my-id"
|
|
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, attempt to update the node part of the data and make sure
|
|
|
|
// that gets rejected since they no longer have permissions.
|
|
|
|
args.Address = "127.0.0.2"
|
|
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
2017-08-23 14:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
2016-12-09 00:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-11 21:01:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_vetDeregisterWithACL(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-05-22 22:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
args := &structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With a nil ACL, the update should be allowed.
|
|
|
|
if err := vetDeregisterWithACL(nil, args, nil, nil); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a basic node policy.
|
2018-10-19 16:04:07 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
node "node" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
nodePerms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-27 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
|
|
service "my-service" {
|
|
|
|
policy = "write"
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-24 18:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
2019-06-27 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
servicePerms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
2019-06-27 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-27 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
for _, args := range []struct {
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest structs.DeregisterRequest
|
|
|
|
Service *structs.NodeService
|
|
|
|
Check *structs.HealthCheck
|
2019-10-15 20:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
Perms acl.Authorizer
|
2019-06-27 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
Expected bool
|
|
|
|
Name string
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "no right on node",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "right on service but node dergister request",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "no rights on node nor service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "no rights on node but rights on service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "no right on node nor service for check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "no rights on node but rights on service for check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "no right on node for node check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on service but no right on node for node check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on node for node",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on service but not on node for node",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on node for service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on service for service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "right on node for check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on service for check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on node for check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
|
|
Name: "rights on service for node check",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
} {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(args.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
err = vetDeregisterWithACL(args.Perms, &args.DeregisterRequest, args.Service, args.Check)
|
|
|
|
if !args.Expected {
|
|
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Errorf("expected error with %+v", args.DeregisterRequest)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
|
|
t.Errorf("expected permission denied error with %+v, instead got %+v", args.DeregisterRequest, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Errorf("expected no error with %+v", args.DeregisterRequest)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
2016-12-10 03:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-08 18:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestDedupeServiceIdentities(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
srvid := func(name string, datacenters ...string) *structs.ACLServiceIdentity {
|
|
|
|
return &structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
ServiceName: name,
|
|
|
|
Datacenters: datacenters,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
in []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity
|
|
|
|
expect []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "empty",
|
|
|
|
in: nil,
|
|
|
|
expect: nil,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "one",
|
|
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("foo"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("foo"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "just names",
|
|
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "just names with dupes",
|
|
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "names with dupes and datacenters",
|
|
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ", "dc2", "dc4"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY", "dc1"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA", "dc9", "dc8"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY", "dc1"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ", "dc3", "dc4"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooY", "dc1"),
|
|
|
|
srvid("fooZ", "dc2", "dc3", "dc4"),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
got := dedupeServiceIdentities(test.in)
|
|
|
|
require.ElementsMatch(t, test.expect, got)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|