open-consul/agent/grpc-external/services/peerstream/stream_test.go

3118 lines
93 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
package peerstream
import (
"bytes"
"context"
"fmt"
"io"
"net"
"sort"
"sync"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc/code"
"google.golang.org/grpc"
"google.golang.org/grpc/codes"
"google.golang.org/grpc/status"
"google.golang.org/protobuf/proto"
newproto "google.golang.org/protobuf/proto"
"google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/anypb"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/acl"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/cache"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/connect"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul/state"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul/stream"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/lib"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/logging"
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2023-02-17 21:14:46 +00:00
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbcommon"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbpeering"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbpeerstream"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbservice"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/pbstatus"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto/private/prototest"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/freeport"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil/retry"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/types"
)
const (
testPeerID = "caf067a6-f112-4907-9101-d45857d2b149"
testPendingStreamSecretID = "522c0daf-2ef2-4dab-bc78-5e04e3daf552"
testEstablishmentSecretID = "f6569d37-1c5b-4415-aae5-26f4594f7f60"
)
func TestStreamResources_Server_Follower(t *testing.T) {
srv, _ := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
backend := c.Backend.(*testStreamBackend)
backend.leader = func() bool {
return false
}
backend.leaderAddr = "expected:address"
})
client := NewMockClient(context.Background())
errCh := make(chan error, 1)
client.ErrCh = errCh
go func() {
// Pass errors from server handler into ErrCh so that they can be seen by the client on Recv().
// This matches gRPC's behavior when an error is returned by a server.
err := srv.StreamResources(client.ReplicationStream)
if err != nil {
errCh <- err
}
}()
// expect error
msg, err := client.Recv()
require.Nil(t, msg)
require.Error(t, err)
require.EqualError(t, err, "rpc error: code = FailedPrecondition desc = cannot establish a peering stream on a follower node")
// expect a status error
st, ok := status.FromError(err)
require.True(t, ok, "need to get back a grpc status error")
deets := st.Details()
// expect a LeaderAddress message
exp := []interface{}{&pbpeerstream.LeaderAddress{Address: "expected:address"}}
prototest.AssertDeepEqual(t, exp, deets)
}
// TestStreamResources_Server_LeaderBecomesFollower simulates a srv that is a leader when the
// subscription request is sent but loses leadership status for subsequent messages.
func TestStreamResources_Server_LeaderBecomesFollower(t *testing.T) {
srv, store := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
backend := c.Backend.(*testStreamBackend)
first := true
backend.leader = func() bool {
if first {
first = false
return true
}
return false
}
backend.leaderAddr = "expected:address"
})
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := NewMockClient(context.Background())
errCh := make(chan error, 1)
client.ErrCh = errCh
go func() {
// Pass errors from server handler into ErrCh so that they can be seen by the client on Recv().
// This matches gRPC's behavior when an error is returned by a server.
if err := srv.StreamResources(client.ReplicationStream); err != nil {
errCh <- err
}
}()
// Receive a subscription from a peer. This message arrives while the
// server is a leader and should work.
testutil.RunStep(t, "send subscription request to leader and consume its three requests", func(t *testing.T) {
sub := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: testPeerID,
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
}
err := client.Send(sub)
require.NoError(t, err)
msg1, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NotEmpty(t, msg1)
msg2, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NotEmpty(t, msg2)
msg3, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NotEmpty(t, msg3)
})
// The ACK will be a new request but at this point the server is not the
// leader in the test and this should fail.
testutil.RunStep(t, "ack fails with non leader", func(t *testing.T) {
ack := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "1",
},
},
}
err := client.Send(ack)
require.NoError(t, err)
// expect error
msg, err := client.Recv()
require.Nil(t, msg)
require.Error(t, err)
require.EqualError(t, err, "rpc error: code = FailedPrecondition desc = node is not a leader anymore; cannot continue streaming")
// expect a status error
st, ok := status.FromError(err)
require.True(t, ok, "need to get back a grpc status error")
// expect a LeaderAddress message
expect := []interface{}{
&pbpeerstream.LeaderAddress{Address: "expected:address"},
}
prototest.AssertDeepEqual(t, expect, st.Details())
})
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_ActiveSecretValidation(t *testing.T) {
type testSeed struct {
peering *pbpeering.Peering
secrets []*pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest
}
type testCase struct {
name string
seed *testSeed
input *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage
wantErr error
}
peeringWithoutSecrets := "35bf39d2-836c-4f66-945f-85f20b17c3db"
run := func(t *testing.T, tc testCase) {
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
// Write a seed peering.
if tc.seed != nil {
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringWrite(1, &pbpeering.PeeringWriteRequest{Peering: tc.seed.peering}))
for _, s := range tc.seed.secrets {
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringSecretsWrite(1, s))
}
}
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := NewMockClient(context.Background())
errCh := make(chan error, 1)
client.ErrCh = errCh
go func() {
// Pass errors from server handler into ErrCh so that they can be seen by the client on Recv().
// This matches gRPC's behavior when an error is returned by a server.
err := srv.StreamResources(client.ReplicationStream)
if err != nil {
errCh <- err
}
}()
err := client.Send(tc.input)
require.NoError(t, err)
_, err = client.Recv()
if tc.wantErr != nil {
require.Error(t, err)
require.EqualError(t, err, tc.wantErr.Error())
} else {
require.NoError(t, err)
}
client.Close()
}
tt := []testCase{
{
name: "no secret for peering",
seed: &testSeed{
peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
Name: "foo",
ID: peeringWithoutSecrets,
},
},
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: peeringWithoutSecrets,
},
},
},
wantErr: status.Error(codes.Internal, "unable to authorize connection, peering must be re-established"),
},
{
name: "unknown secret",
seed: &testSeed{
peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
Name: "foo",
ID: testPeerID,
},
secrets: []*pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest{
{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateToken{
GenerateToken: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateTokenRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
},
},
},
},
},
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: testPeerID,
StreamSecretID: "unknown-secret",
},
},
},
wantErr: status.Error(codes.PermissionDenied, "invalid peering stream secret"),
},
{
name: "known pending secret",
seed: &testSeed{
peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
Name: "foo",
ID: testPeerID,
},
secrets: []*pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest{
{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateToken{
GenerateToken: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateTokenRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
},
},
},
{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_ExchangeSecret{
ExchangeSecret: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_ExchangeSecretRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
PendingStreamSecret: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
},
},
},
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: testPeerID,
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
},
},
{
name: "known active secret",
seed: &testSeed{
peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
Name: "foo",
ID: testPeerID,
},
secrets: []*pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest{
{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateToken{
GenerateToken: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateTokenRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
},
},
},
{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_ExchangeSecret{
ExchangeSecret: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_ExchangeSecretRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
PendingStreamSecret: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
},
{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_PromotePending{
PromotePending: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_PromotePendingRequest{
// Pending gets promoted to active.
ActiveStreamSecret: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
},
},
},
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: testPeerID,
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
},
},
}
for _, tc := range tt {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
run(t, tc)
})
}
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_PendingSecretPromotion(t *testing.T) {
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
_ = writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
client := NewMockClient(context.Background())
errCh := make(chan error, 1)
client.ErrCh = errCh
go func() {
// Pass errors from server handler into ErrCh so that they can be seen by the client on Recv().
// This matches gRPC's behavior when an error is returned by a server.
err := srv.StreamResources(client.ReplicationStream)
if err != nil {
errCh <- err
}
}()
err := client.Send(&pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: testPeerID,
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
})
require.NoError(t, err)
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
// Upon presenting a known pending secret ID, it should be promoted to active.
secrets, err := store.PeeringSecretsRead(nil, testPeerID)
require.NoError(r, err)
require.Empty(r, secrets.GetStream().GetPendingSecretID())
require.Equal(r, testPendingStreamSecretID, secrets.GetStream().GetActiveSecretID())
})
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_FirstRequest(t *testing.T) {
type testCase struct {
name string
input *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage
wantErr error
}
run := func(t *testing.T, tc testCase) {
srv, _ := newTestServer(t, nil)
client := NewMockClient(context.Background())
errCh := make(chan error, 1)
client.ErrCh = errCh
go func() {
// Pass errors from server handler into ErrCh so that they can be seen by the client on Recv().
// This matches gRPC's behavior when an error is returned by a server.
err := srv.StreamResources(client.ReplicationStream)
if err != nil {
errCh <- err
}
}()
err := client.Send(tc.input)
require.NoError(t, err)
msg, err := client.Recv()
require.Nil(t, msg)
require.Error(t, err)
require.EqualError(t, err, tc.wantErr.Error())
}
tt := []testCase{
{
name: "unexpected response",
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response_{
Response: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResourceID: "api-service",
Nonce: "2",
},
},
},
wantErr: status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "first message when initiating a peering must be: Open"),
},
{
name: "unexpected request",
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
},
},
},
wantErr: status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "first message when initiating a peering must be: Open"),
},
{
name: "missing peer id",
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{},
},
},
wantErr: status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "initial subscription request must specify a PeerID"),
},
{
name: "unknown peer",
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: "63b60245-c475-426b-b314-4588d210859d",
},
},
},
wantErr: status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "initial subscription for unknown PeerID: 63b60245-c475-426b-b314-4588d210859d"),
},
}
for _, tc := range tt {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
run(t, tc)
})
}
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_Terminate(t *testing.T) {
it := incrementalTime{
base: time.Date(2000, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC),
}
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
srv.Tracker.setClock(it.Now)
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, testPeerID)
client.DrainStream(t)
testutil.RunStep(t, "new stream gets tracked", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.True(r, status.Connected)
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "terminate the stream", func(t *testing.T) {
done := srv.ConnectedStreams()[testPeerID]
close(done)
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
_, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.False(r, ok)
})
})
receivedTerm, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
expect := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Terminated_{
Terminated: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Terminated{},
},
}
prototest.AssertDeepEqual(t, expect, receivedTerm)
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_StreamTracker(t *testing.T) {
it := incrementalTime{
base: time.Date(2000, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC),
}
waitUntil := it.FutureNow(6)
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
srv.Tracker.setClock(it.Now)
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
client := makeClient(t, srv, testPeerID)
testutil.RunStep(t, "new stream gets tracked", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.True(r, status.Connected)
})
})
var lastSendAck time.Time
var lastSendSuccess *time.Time
client.DrainStream(t)
// Wait for async workflows to complete.
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
require.Equal(r, waitUntil, it.FutureNow(1))
})
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
// Manually grab the last success time from sending the trust bundle or exported services list.
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(t, ok)
lastSendSuccess = status.LastSendSuccess
testutil.RunStep(t, "ack tracked as success", func(t *testing.T) {
ack := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
PeerID: testPeerID,
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "1",
// Acks do not have an Error populated in the request
},
},
}
lastSendAck = it.FutureNow(1)
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
err := client.Send(ack)
require.NoError(t, err)
expect := Status{
Connected: true,
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
LastSendSuccess: lastSendSuccess,
LastAck: &lastSendAck,
ExportedServices: []string{},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
rStatus, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.Equal(r, expect, rStatus)
})
})
var lastNack time.Time
var lastNackMsg string
testutil.RunStep(t, "nack tracked as error", func(t *testing.T) {
nack := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
PeerID: testPeerID,
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "2",
Error: &pbstatus.Status{
Code: int32(code.Code_UNAVAILABLE),
Message: "bad bad not good",
},
},
},
}
lastNack = it.FutureNow(1)
err := client.Send(nack)
require.NoError(t, err)
lastNackMsg = "client peer was unable to apply resource: bad bad not good"
expect := Status{
Connected: true,
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
LastSendSuccess: lastSendSuccess,
LastAck: &lastSendAck,
LastNack: &lastNack,
LastNackMessage: lastNackMsg,
ExportedServices: []string{},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
rStatus, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.Equal(r, expect, rStatus)
})
})
var lastRecvResourceSuccess time.Time
testutil.RunStep(t, "response applied locally", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response_{
Response: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResourceID: "api",
Nonce: "21",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT,
Resource: makeAnyPB(t, &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{}),
},
},
}
lastRecvResourceSuccess = it.FutureNow(1)
err := client.Send(resp)
require.NoError(t, err)
expectAck := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "21",
},
},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
msg, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(r, err)
req := msg.GetRequest()
require.NotNil(r, req)
require.Equal(r, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService, req.ResourceURL)
prototest.AssertDeepEqual(t, expectAck, msg)
})
expect := Status{
Connected: true,
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
LastSendSuccess: lastSendSuccess,
LastAck: &lastSendAck,
LastNack: &lastNack,
LastNackMessage: lastNackMsg,
LastRecvResourceSuccess: &lastRecvResourceSuccess,
ExportedServices: []string{},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.Equal(r, expect, status)
})
})
var lastRecvError time.Time
var lastRecvErrorMsg string
testutil.RunStep(t, "response fails to apply locally", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response_{
Response: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResourceID: "web",
Nonce: "24",
// Unknown operation gets NACKed
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED,
},
},
}
lastRecvError = it.FutureNow(1)
err := client.Send(resp)
require.NoError(t, err)
ack, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
expectNack := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "24",
Error: &pbstatus.Status{
Code: int32(code.Code_INVALID_ARGUMENT),
Message: `unsupported operation: "OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED"`,
},
},
},
}
prototest.AssertDeepEqual(t, expectNack, ack)
lastRecvErrorMsg = `unsupported operation: "OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED"`
expect := Status{
Connected: true,
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
LastSendSuccess: lastSendSuccess,
LastAck: &lastSendAck,
LastNack: &lastNack,
LastNackMessage: lastNackMsg,
LastRecvResourceSuccess: &lastRecvResourceSuccess,
LastRecvError: &lastRecvError,
LastRecvErrorMessage: lastRecvErrorMsg,
ExportedServices: []string{},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.Equal(r, expect, status)
})
})
var lastRecvHeartbeat time.Time
testutil.RunStep(t, "receives heartbeat", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Heartbeat_{
Heartbeat: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Heartbeat{},
},
}
lastRecvHeartbeat = it.FutureNow(1)
err := client.Send(resp)
require.NoError(t, err)
expect := Status{
Connected: true,
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
LastSendSuccess: lastSendSuccess,
LastAck: &lastSendAck,
LastNack: &lastNack,
LastNackMessage: lastNackMsg,
LastRecvResourceSuccess: &lastRecvResourceSuccess,
LastRecvError: &lastRecvError,
LastRecvErrorMessage: lastRecvErrorMsg,
LastRecvHeartbeat: &lastRecvHeartbeat,
ExportedServices: []string{},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.Equal(r, expect, status)
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "client disconnect marks stream as disconnected", func(t *testing.T) {
lastRecvError = it.FutureNow(1)
disconnectTime := it.FutureNow(2)
lastRecvErrorMsg = "stream ended unexpectedly"
client.Close()
expect := Status{
Connected: false,
DisconnectErrorMessage: lastRecvErrorMsg,
2022-10-10 19:18:08 +00:00
LastSendSuccess: lastSendSuccess,
LastAck: &lastSendAck,
LastNack: &lastNack,
LastNackMessage: lastNackMsg,
DisconnectTime: &disconnectTime,
LastRecvResourceSuccess: &lastRecvResourceSuccess,
LastRecvError: &lastRecvError,
LastRecvErrorMessage: lastRecvErrorMsg,
LastRecvHeartbeat: &lastRecvHeartbeat,
ExportedServices: []string{},
}
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.Equal(r, expect, status)
})
})
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_ServiceUpdates(t *testing.T) {
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
// Create a peering
var lastIdx uint64 = 1
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, lastIdx, "my-peering")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, p.ID)
// Register a service that is not yet exported
mysql := &structs.CheckServiceNode{
Node: &structs.Node{Node: "foo", Address: "10.0.0.1"},
Service: &structs.NodeService{ID: "mysql-1", Service: "mysql", Port: 5000},
}
mysqlSidecar := &structs.NodeService{
Kind: structs.ServiceKindConnectProxy,
Service: "mysql-sidecar-proxy",
Proxy: structs.ConnectProxyConfig{
DestinationServiceName: "mysql",
},
}
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureNode(lastIdx, mysql.Node))
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureService(lastIdx, "foo", mysql.Service))
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureService(lastIdx, "foo", mysqlSidecar))
mongoSvcDefaults := &structs.ServiceConfigEntry{
Kind: structs.ServiceDefaults,
Name: "mongo",
Protocol: "grpc",
}
require.NoError(t, mongoSvcDefaults.Normalize())
require.NoError(t, mongoSvcDefaults.Validate())
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureConfigEntry(lastIdx, mongoSvcDefaults))
// NOTE: for this test we'll just live in a fantasy realm where we assume
// that mongo understands gRPC
var (
mongoSN = structs.NewServiceName("mongo", nil).String()
mongoProxySN = structs.NewServiceName("mongo-sidecar-proxy", nil).String()
mysqlSN = structs.NewServiceName("mysql", nil).String()
mysqlProxySN = structs.NewServiceName("mysql-sidecar-proxy", nil).String()
)
testutil.RunStep(t, "initial stream data is received", func(t *testing.T) {
expectReplEvents(t, client,
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringTrustBundle, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
// Roots tested in TestStreamResources_Server_CARootUpdates
},
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, subExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var exportedServices pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&exportedServices))
require.ElementsMatch(t, []string{}, exportedServices.Services)
},
)
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "exporting mysql leads to an UPSERT event", func(t *testing.T) {
entry := &structs.ExportedServicesConfigEntry{
Name: "default",
Services: []structs.ExportedService{
{
Name: "mysql",
Consumers: []structs.ServiceConsumer{
{Peer: "my-peering"},
},
},
{
// Mongo does not get pushed because it does not have instances registered.
Name: "mongo",
Consumers: []structs.ServiceConsumer{
{Peer: "my-peering"},
},
},
},
}
require.NoError(t, entry.Normalize())
require.NoError(t, entry.Validate())
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureConfigEntry(lastIdx, entry))
expectReplEvents(t, client,
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
// no mongo instances exist
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, mongoSN, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var nodes pbpeerstream.ExportedService
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&nodes))
require.Len(t, nodes.Nodes, 0)
},
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, mysqlSN, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var nodes pbpeerstream.ExportedService
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&nodes))
require.Len(t, nodes.Nodes, 1)
},
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
// proxies can't export because no mesh gateway exists yet
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, mysqlProxySN, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var nodes pbpeerstream.ExportedService
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&nodes))
require.Len(t, nodes.Nodes, 0)
},
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, subExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var exportedServices pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&exportedServices))
require.ElementsMatch(t,
[]string{structs.ServiceName{Name: "mongo"}.String(), structs.ServiceName{Name: "mysql"}.String()},
exportedServices.Services)
},
)
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "register mesh gateway to send proxy updates", func(t *testing.T) {
gateway := &structs.CheckServiceNode{Node: &structs.Node{Node: "mgw", Address: "10.1.1.1"},
Service: &structs.NodeService{ID: "gateway-1", Kind: structs.ServiceKindMeshGateway, Service: "gateway", Port: 8443},
// TODO: checks
}
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureNode(lastIdx, gateway.Node))
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureService(lastIdx, "mgw", gateway.Service))
expectReplEvents(t, client,
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, mysqlProxySN, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var nodes pbpeerstream.ExportedService
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&nodes))
require.Len(t, nodes.Nodes, 1)
pm := nodes.Nodes[0].Service.Connect.PeerMeta
require.Equal(t, "tcp", pm.Protocol)
spiffeIDs := []string{
"spiffe://11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/mysql",
"spiffe://11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555.consul/gateway/mesh/dc/dc1",
}
require.Equal(t, spiffeIDs, pm.SpiffeID)
},
)
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "register service resolver to send proxy updates", func(t *testing.T) {
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureConfigEntry(lastIdx, &structs.ServiceResolverConfigEntry{
Kind: structs.ServiceResolver,
Name: "mongo",
}))
expectReplEvents(t, client,
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, mongoProxySN, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var nodes pbpeerstream.ExportedService
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&nodes))
require.Len(t, nodes.Nodes, 1)
pm := nodes.Nodes[0].Service.Connect.PeerMeta
require.Equal(t, "grpc", pm.Protocol)
spiffeIDs := []string{
"spiffe://11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555.consul/ns/default/dc/dc1/svc/mongo",
"spiffe://11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555.consul/gateway/mesh/dc/dc1",
}
require.Equal(t, spiffeIDs, pm.SpiffeID)
},
)
})
mongo := &structs.CheckServiceNode{
Node: &structs.Node{Node: "zip", Address: "10.0.0.3"},
Service: &structs.NodeService{ID: "mongo-1", Service: "mongo", Port: 5000},
}
testutil.RunStep(t, "registering mongo instance leads to an UPSERT event", func(t *testing.T) {
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureNode(lastIdx, mongo.Node))
lastIdx++
require.NoError(t, store.EnsureService(lastIdx, "zip", mongo.Service))
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
msg, err := client.RecvWithTimeout(100 * time.Millisecond)
require.NoError(r, err)
require.Equal(r, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
require.Equal(r, mongo.Service.CompoundServiceName().String(), msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
var nodes pbpeerstream.ExportedService
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&nodes))
require.Len(r, nodes.Nodes, 1)
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "un-exporting mysql leads to an exported service list update", func(t *testing.T) {
entry := &structs.ExportedServicesConfigEntry{
Name: "default",
Services: []structs.ExportedService{
{
Name: "mongo",
Consumers: []structs.ServiceConsumer{
{
Peer: "my-peering",
},
},
},
},
}
require.NoError(t, entry.Normalize())
require.NoError(t, entry.Validate())
lastIdx++
err := store.EnsureConfigEntry(lastIdx, entry)
require.NoError(t, err)
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
msg, err := client.RecvWithTimeout(100 * time.Millisecond)
require.NoError(r, err)
require.Equal(r, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, subExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var exportedServices pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&exportedServices))
require.Equal(t, []string{structs.ServiceName{Name: "mongo"}.String()}, exportedServices.Services)
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "deleting the config entry leads to a DELETE event for mongo", func(t *testing.T) {
err := store.DeleteConfigEntry(lastIdx, structs.ExportedServices, "default", nil)
require.NoError(t, err)
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
msg, err := client.RecvWithTimeout(100 * time.Millisecond)
require.NoError(r, err)
require.Equal(r, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, subExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var exportedServices pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&exportedServices))
require.Len(t, exportedServices.Services, 0)
})
})
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_CARootUpdates(t *testing.T) {
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
// Create a peering
var lastIdx uint64 = 1
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, lastIdx, "my-peering")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
clusterID, rootA := writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, p.ID)
testutil.RunStep(t, "initial CA Roots replication", func(t *testing.T) {
expectReplEvents(t, client,
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringTrustBundle, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, "roots", msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var trustBundle pbpeering.PeeringTrustBundle
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&trustBundle))
require.ElementsMatch(t, []string{rootA.RootCert}, trustBundle.RootPEMs)
expect := connect.SpiffeIDSigningForCluster(clusterID).Host()
require.Equal(t, expect, trustBundle.TrustDomain)
},
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, subExportedServiceList, msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var exportedServices pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&exportedServices))
require.ElementsMatch(t, []string{}, exportedServices.Services)
},
)
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "CA root rotation sends upsert event", func(t *testing.T) {
// get max index for CAS operation
cidx, _, err := store.CARoots(nil)
require.NoError(t, err)
rootB := connect.TestCA(t, nil)
rootC := connect.TestCA(t, nil)
rootC.Active = false // there can only be one active root
lastIdx++
set, err := store.CARootSetCAS(lastIdx, cidx, []*structs.CARoot{rootB, rootC})
require.True(t, set)
require.NoError(t, err)
expectReplEvents(t, client,
func(t *testing.T, msg *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage) {
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringTrustBundle, msg.GetResponse().ResourceURL)
require.Equal(t, "roots", msg.GetResponse().ResourceID)
require.Equal(t, pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT, msg.GetResponse().Operation)
var trustBundle pbpeering.PeeringTrustBundle
require.NoError(t, msg.GetResponse().Resource.UnmarshalTo(&trustBundle))
require.ElementsMatch(t, []string{rootB.RootCert, rootC.RootCert}, trustBundle.RootPEMs)
expect := connect.SpiffeIDSigningForCluster(clusterID).Host()
require.Equal(t, expect, trustBundle.TrustDomain)
},
)
})
}
func TestStreamResources_Server_AckNackNonce(t *testing.T) {
srv, store := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
c.incomingHeartbeatTimeout = 10 * time.Millisecond
})
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, testPeerID)
client.DrainStream(t)
testutil.RunStep(t, "ack contains nonce from response", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response_{
Response: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT,
Nonce: "1234",
},
},
}
require.NoError(t, client.Send(resp))
msg, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, "1234", msg.GetRequest().ResponseNonce)
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "nack contains nonce from response", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response_{
Response: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED, // Unspecified gets NACK
Nonce: "5678",
},
},
}
require.NoError(t, client.Send(resp))
msg, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, "5678", msg.GetRequest().ResponseNonce)
})
// Add in a sleep to prevent the test from flaking.
// The mock client expects certain calls to be made.
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
}
// Test that when the client doesn't send a heartbeat in time, the stream is disconnected.
func TestStreamResources_Server_DisconnectsOnHeartbeatTimeout(t *testing.T) {
it := incrementalTime{
base: time.Date(2000, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC),
}
srv, store := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
c.incomingHeartbeatTimeout = 50 * time.Millisecond
})
srv.Tracker.setClock(it.Now)
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, testPeerID)
client.DrainStream(t)
testutil.RunStep(t, "new stream gets tracked", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.True(r, status.Connected)
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "stream is disconnected due to heartbeat timeout", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
2023-02-23 19:52:18 +00:00
disconnectTime := ptr(it.StaticNow())
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.False(r, status.Connected)
require.Equal(r, "heartbeat timeout", status.DisconnectErrorMessage)
require.Equal(r, disconnectTime, status.DisconnectTime)
})
})
}
// Test that the server sends heartbeats at the expected interval.
func TestStreamResources_Server_SendsHeartbeats(t *testing.T) {
it := incrementalTime{
base: time.Date(2000, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC),
}
outgoingHeartbeatInterval := 5 * time.Millisecond
srv, store := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
c.outgoingHeartbeatInterval = outgoingHeartbeatInterval
})
srv.Tracker.setClock(it.Now)
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, testPeerID)
testutil.RunStep(t, "new stream gets tracked", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
_, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(r, err)
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.True(r, status.Connected)
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "sends first heartbeat", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.RunWith(&retry.Timer{
Timeout: outgoingHeartbeatInterval * 2,
Wait: outgoingHeartbeatInterval / 2,
}, t, func(r *retry.R) {
heartbeat, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(r, err)
require.NotNil(r, heartbeat.GetHeartbeat())
})
})
testutil.RunStep(t, "sends second heartbeat", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.RunWith(&retry.Timer{
Timeout: outgoingHeartbeatInterval * 2,
Wait: outgoingHeartbeatInterval / 2,
}, t, func(r *retry.R) {
heartbeat, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(r, err)
require.NotNil(r, heartbeat.GetHeartbeat())
})
})
}
// Test that as long as the server receives heartbeats it keeps the connection open.
func TestStreamResources_Server_KeepsConnectionOpenWithHeartbeat(t *testing.T) {
it := incrementalTime{
base: time.Date(2000, time.January, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC),
}
incomingHeartbeatTimeout := 50 * time.Millisecond
srv, store := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
c.incomingHeartbeatTimeout = incomingHeartbeatTimeout
})
srv.Tracker.setClock(it.Now)
p := writePeeringToBeDialed(t, store, 1, "my-peer")
require.Empty(t, p.PeerID, "should be empty if being dialed")
// Set the initial roots and CA configuration.
_, _ = writeInitialRootsAndCA(t, store)
client := makeClient(t, srv, testPeerID)
client.DrainStream(t)
testutil.RunStep(t, "new stream gets tracked", func(t *testing.T) {
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
require.True(r, ok)
require.True(r, status.Connected)
})
})
heartbeatMsg := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Heartbeat_{
Heartbeat: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Heartbeat{}}}
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
defer cancel()
// errCh is used to collect any send errors from within the goroutine.
errCh := make(chan error)
// Set up a goroutine to send the heartbeat every 1/2 of the timeout.
go func() {
// This is just a do while loop. We want to send the heartbeat right away to start
// because the test setup above takes some time and we might be close to the heartbeat
// timeout already.
for {
err := client.Send(heartbeatMsg)
if err != nil {
select {
case errCh <- err:
case <-ctx.Done():
}
return
}
select {
case <-time.After(incomingHeartbeatTimeout / 10): // Going any slower here triggers flakes when running
case <-ctx.Done():
close(errCh)
return
}
}
}()
// Assert that the stream remains connected for 5 heartbeat timeouts.
require.Never(t, func() bool {
status, ok := srv.StreamStatus(testPeerID)
if !ok {
return true
}
return !status.Connected
}, incomingHeartbeatTimeout*5, incomingHeartbeatTimeout)
// Kill the heartbeat sending goroutine and check if it had any errors.
cancel()
err, ok := <-errCh
if ok {
require.NoError(t, err)
}
}
// makeClient sets up a *MockClient with the initial subscription
// message handshake.
func makeClient(t *testing.T, srv *testServer, peerID string) *MockClient {
t.Helper()
client := NewMockClient(context.Background())
errCh := make(chan error, 1)
client.ErrCh = errCh
go func() {
// Pass errors from server handler into ErrCh so that they can be seen by the client on Recv().
// This matches gRPC's behavior when an error is returned by a server.
if err := srv.StreamResources(client.ReplicationStream); err != nil {
errCh <- err
}
}()
// Send the initial request
require.NoError(t, client.Send(&pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
PeerID: testPeerID,
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
}))
2023-02-23 19:52:18 +00:00
// Receive ExportedService, ExportedServiceList, and PeeringTrustBundle subscription requests from server
receivedSub1, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
receivedSub2, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
receivedSub3, err := client.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err)
// This is required when the client subscribes to server address replication messages.
// We assert for the handler to be called at least once but the data doesn't matter.
srv.mockSnapshotHandler.expect("", 0, 0, nil)
// Issue services, roots, and server address subscription to server.
// Note that server address may not come as an initial message
for _, resourceURL := range []string{
pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringTrustBundle,
pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringServerAddresses,
} {
init := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
PeerID: peerID,
ResourceURL: resourceURL,
},
},
}
require.NoError(t, client.Send(init))
}
expect := []*pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
// The PeerID field is only set for the messages coming FROM
// the establishing side and are going to be empty from the
// other side.
PeerID: "",
},
},
},
{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringTrustBundle,
// The PeerID field is only set for the messages coming FROM
// the establishing side and are going to be empty from the
// other side.
PeerID: "",
},
},
},
{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringServerAddresses,
// The PeerID field is only set for the messages coming FROM
// the establishing side and are going to be empty from the
// other side.
PeerID: "",
},
},
},
}
got := []*pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
receivedSub1,
receivedSub2,
receivedSub3,
}
prototest.AssertElementsMatch(t, expect, got)
return client
}
type testStreamBackend struct {
pub state.EventPublisher
store *state.Store
leader func() bool
leaderAddrLock sync.Mutex
leaderAddr string
}
var _ Backend = (*testStreamBackend)(nil)
func (b *testStreamBackend) IsLeader() bool {
if b.leader != nil {
return b.leader()
}
return true
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) SetLeaderAddress(addr string) {
b.leaderAddrLock.Lock()
defer b.leaderAddrLock.Unlock()
b.leaderAddr = addr
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) GetLeaderAddress() string {
b.leaderAddrLock.Lock()
defer b.leaderAddrLock.Unlock()
return b.leaderAddr
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) Subscribe(req *stream.SubscribeRequest) (*stream.Subscription, error) {
return b.pub.Subscribe(req)
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) PeeringTerminateByID(req *pbpeering.PeeringTerminateByIDRequest) error {
panic("not implemented")
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) PeeringTrustBundleWrite(req *pbpeering.PeeringTrustBundleWriteRequest) error {
panic("not implemented")
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) ValidateProposedPeeringSecret(id string) (bool, error) {
return true, nil
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) PeeringSecretsWrite(req *pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest) error {
return b.store.PeeringSecretsWrite(1, req)
}
func (b *testStreamBackend) PeeringWrite(req *pbpeering.PeeringWriteRequest) error {
return b.store.PeeringWrite(1, req)
}
// CatalogRegister mocks catalog registrations through Raft by copying the logic of FSM.applyRegister.
func (b *testStreamBackend) CatalogRegister(req *structs.RegisterRequest) error {
return b.store.EnsureRegistration(1, req)
}
// CatalogDeregister mocks catalog de-registrations through Raft by copying the logic of FSM.applyDeregister.
func (b *testStreamBackend) CatalogDeregister(req *structs.DeregisterRequest) error {
if req.ServiceID != "" {
if err := b.store.DeleteService(1, req.Node, req.ServiceID, &req.EnterpriseMeta, req.PeerName); err != nil {
return err
}
} else if req.CheckID != "" {
if err := b.store.DeleteCheck(1, req.Node, req.CheckID, &req.EnterpriseMeta, req.PeerName); err != nil {
return err
}
} else {
if err := b.store.DeleteNode(1, req.Node, &req.EnterpriseMeta, req.PeerName); err != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
func Test_ExportedServicesCount(t *testing.T) {
peerName := "billing"
peerID := "1fabcd52-1d46-49b0-b1d8-71559aee47f5"
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringWrite(31, &pbpeering.PeeringWriteRequest{
Peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
ID: peerID,
Name: peerName,
},
}))
// connect the stream
mst, err := srv.Tracker.Connected(peerID)
require.NoError(t, err)
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
services := []string{
structs.NewServiceName("web", nil).String(),
structs.NewServiceName("api", nil).String(),
structs.NewServiceName("mongo", nil).String(),
}
update := cache.UpdateEvent{
CorrelationID: subExportedServiceList,
Result: &pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList{
Services: services,
}}
_, err = makeExportedServiceListResponse(mst, update)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Test the count and contents separately to ensure the count code path is hit.
require.Equal(t, 3, mst.GetExportedServicesCount())
require.ElementsMatch(t, services, mst.ExportedServices)
}
func Test_processResponse_Validation(t *testing.T) {
peerName := "billing"
peerID := "1fabcd52-1d46-49b0-b1d8-71559aee47f5"
type testCase struct {
name string
in *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response
expect *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage
extraTests func(t *testing.T, s *state.Store)
wantErr bool
}
srv, store := newTestServer(t, nil)
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringWrite(31, &pbpeering.PeeringWriteRequest{
Peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
Name: peerName,
ID: peerID,
ManualServerAddresses: []string{"manual"},
PeerServerAddresses: []string{"one", "two"},
},
}))
// connect the stream
mst, err := srv.Tracker.Connected(peerID)
require.NoError(t, err)
run := func(t *testing.T, tc testCase) {
2022-08-22 14:09:47 +00:00
reply, err := srv.processResponse(peerName, "", mst, tc.in)
if tc.wantErr {
require.Error(t, err)
} else {
require.NoError(t, err)
}
require.Equal(t, tc.expect, reply)
if tc.extraTests != nil {
tc.extraTests(t, store)
}
}
tt := []testCase{
{
name: "valid upsert",
in: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResourceID: "api",
Nonce: "1",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT,
Resource: makeAnyPB(t, &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{}),
},
expect: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "1",
},
},
},
wantErr: false,
},
{
name: "invalid resource url",
in: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: "nomad.Job",
Nonce: "1",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED,
},
expect: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: "nomad.Job",
ResponseNonce: "1",
Error: &pbstatus.Status{
Code: int32(code.Code_INVALID_ARGUMENT),
Message: `received response for unknown resource type "nomad.Job"`,
},
},
},
},
wantErr: true,
},
{
name: "missing a nonce",
in: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResourceID: "web",
Nonce: "",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED,
},
expect: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "",
Error: &pbstatus.Status{
Code: int32(code.Code_INVALID_ARGUMENT),
Message: fmt.Sprintf(`received response without a nonce for: %s:web`, pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService),
},
},
},
},
wantErr: true,
},
{
name: "unknown operation",
in: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
Nonce: "1",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED,
},
expect: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "1",
Error: &pbstatus.Status{
Code: int32(code.Code_INVALID_ARGUMENT),
Message: `unsupported operation: "OPERATION_UNSPECIFIED"`,
},
},
},
},
wantErr: true,
},
{
name: "out of range operation",
in: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
Nonce: "1",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation(100000),
},
expect: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
ResponseNonce: "1",
Error: &pbstatus.Status{
Code: int32(code.Code_INVALID_ARGUMENT),
Message: `unsupported operation: 100000`,
},
},
},
},
wantErr: true,
},
{
name: "manual server addresses are not overwritten",
in: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringServerAddresses,
Nonce: "1",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT,
Resource: makeAnyPB(t, &pbpeering.PeeringServerAddresses{
Addresses: []string{"three"},
}),
},
expect: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_{
Request: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLPeeringServerAddresses,
ResponseNonce: "1",
},
},
},
extraTests: func(t *testing.T, s *state.Store) {
_, peer, err := s.PeeringReadByID(nil, peerID)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, []string{"manual"}, peer.ManualServerAddresses)
require.Equal(t, []string{"three"}, peer.PeerServerAddresses)
},
wantErr: false,
},
}
for _, tc := range tt {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
run(t, tc)
})
}
}
// writePeeringToDialFrom creates a peering with the provided name and ensures
// the PeerID field is set for the ID of the remote peer.
func writePeeringToDialFrom(t *testing.T, store *state.Store, idx uint64, peerName string) *pbpeering.Peering {
remotePeerID, err := uuid.GenerateUUID()
require.NoError(t, err)
return writeTestPeering(t, store, idx, peerName, remotePeerID)
}
// writePeeringToBeDialed creates a peering with the provided name and ensures
// the PeerID field is NOT set for the ID of the remote peer.
func writePeeringToBeDialed(t *testing.T, store *state.Store, idx uint64, peerName string) *pbpeering.Peering {
return writeTestPeering(t, store, idx, peerName, "")
}
func writeTestPeering(t *testing.T, store *state.Store, idx uint64, peerName, remotePeerID string) *pbpeering.Peering {
peering := pbpeering.Peering{
ID: testPeerID,
Name: peerName,
PeerID: remotePeerID,
}
if remotePeerID != "" {
peering.PeerServerAddresses = []string{"127.0.0.1:5300"}
}
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringWrite(idx, &pbpeering.PeeringWriteRequest{
Peering: &peering,
SecretsRequest: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest{
PeerID: testPeerID,
// Simulate generating a stream secret by first generating a token then exchanging for a stream secret.
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateToken{
GenerateToken: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_GenerateTokenRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
},
},
},
}))
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringSecretsWrite(idx, &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest{
PeerID: testPeerID,
Request: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_ExchangeSecret{
ExchangeSecret: &pbpeering.SecretsWriteRequest_ExchangeSecretRequest{
EstablishmentSecret: testEstablishmentSecretID,
PendingStreamSecret: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
}))
_, p, err := store.PeeringRead(nil, state.Query{Value: peerName})
require.NoError(t, err)
return p
}
func writeInitialRootsAndCA(t *testing.T, store *state.Store) (string, *structs.CARoot) {
const clusterID = connect.TestClusterID
rootA := connect.TestCA(t, nil)
_, err := store.CARootSetCAS(1, 0, structs.CARoots{rootA})
require.NoError(t, err)
err = store.CASetConfig(0, &structs.CAConfiguration{ClusterID: clusterID})
require.NoError(t, err)
return clusterID, rootA
}
func makeAnyPB(t *testing.T, pb newproto.Message) *anypb.Any {
any, err := anypb.New(pb)
require.NoError(t, err)
return any
}
func expectReplEvents(t *testing.T, client *MockClient, checkFns ...func(t *testing.T, got *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage)) {
t.Helper()
num := len(checkFns)
if num == 0 {
// No updates should be received.
msg, err := client.RecvWithTimeout(100 * time.Millisecond)
if err == io.EOF && msg == nil {
return
} else if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("received unexpected update error: %v", err)
} else {
t.Fatalf("received unexpected update: %+v", msg)
}
}
const timeout = 10 * time.Second
var out []*pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage
for len(out) < num {
msg, err := client.RecvWithTimeout(timeout)
if err == io.EOF && msg == nil {
t.Fatalf("timed out with %d of %d events", len(out), num)
}
require.NoError(t, err)
out = append(out, msg)
}
if msg, err := client.RecvWithTimeout(100 * time.Millisecond); err != io.EOF || msg != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected only %d events but got more; prev %+v; next %+v", num, out, msg)
}
require.Len(t, out, num)
sort.SliceStable(out, func(i, j int) bool {
a, b := out[i], out[j]
typeA := fmt.Sprintf("%T", a.GetPayload())
typeB := fmt.Sprintf("%T", b.GetPayload())
if typeA != typeB {
return typeA < typeB
}
switch a.GetPayload().(type) {
case *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Request_:
reqA, reqB := a.GetRequest(), b.GetRequest()
if reqA.ResourceURL != reqB.ResourceURL {
return reqA.ResourceURL < reqB.ResourceURL
}
return reqA.ResponseNonce < reqB.ResponseNonce
case *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response_:
respA, respB := a.GetResponse(), b.GetResponse()
if respA.ResourceURL != respB.ResourceURL {
return respA.ResourceURL < respB.ResourceURL
}
if respA.ResourceID != respB.ResourceID {
return respA.ResourceID < respB.ResourceID
}
return respA.Nonce < respB.Nonce
case *pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Terminated_:
return false
default:
panic("unknown type")
}
})
nonces := make(map[string]struct{})
for i := 0; i < num; i++ {
checkFns[i](t, out[i])
// Ensure every nonce was unique.
if resp := out[i].GetResponse(); resp != nil {
require.NotContains(t, nonces, resp.Nonce)
2022-10-12 13:50:17 +00:00
nonces[resp.Nonce] = struct{}{}
}
}
}
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
type PeeringProcessResponse_testCase struct {
name string
seed []*structs.RegisterRequest
inputServiceName structs.ServiceName
input *pbpeerstream.ExportedService
expect map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes
exportedServices []string
}
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
func processResponse_ExportedServiceUpdates(
t *testing.T,
srv *testServer,
store *state.Store,
localEntMeta acl.EnterpriseMeta,
peerName string,
tests []PeeringProcessResponse_testCase,
) {
// create a peering in the state store
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
peerID := "1fabcd52-1d46-49b0-b1d8-71559aee47f5"
require.NoError(t, store.PeeringWrite(31, &pbpeering.PeeringWriteRequest{
Peering: &pbpeering.Peering{
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
ID: peerID,
Name: peerName,
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrDefault(),
},
}))
// connect the stream
mst, err := srv.Tracker.Connected(peerID)
require.NoError(t, err)
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
run := func(t *testing.T, tc PeeringProcessResponse_testCase) {
// Seed the local catalog with some data to reconcile against.
// and increment the tracker's imported services count
var serviceNames []structs.ServiceName
for _, reg := range tc.seed {
require.NoError(t, srv.Backend.CatalogRegister(reg))
sn := reg.Service.CompoundServiceName()
serviceNames = append(serviceNames, sn)
}
mst.SetImportedServices(serviceNames)
in := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedService,
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
ResourceID: tc.inputServiceName.String(),
Nonce: "1",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT,
Resource: makeAnyPB(t, tc.input),
}
// Simulate an update arriving for billing/api.
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
_, err = srv.processResponse(peerName, localEntMeta.PartitionOrDefault(), mst, in)
require.NoError(t, err)
if len(tc.exportedServices) > 0 {
resp := &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Response{
ResourceURL: pbpeerstream.TypeURLExportedServiceList,
ResourceID: subExportedServiceList,
Nonce: "2",
Operation: pbpeerstream.Operation_OPERATION_UPSERT,
Resource: makeAnyPB(t, &pbpeerstream.ExportedServiceList{Services: tc.exportedServices}),
}
// Simulate an update arriving for billing/api.
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
_, err = srv.processResponse(peerName, localEntMeta.PartitionOrDefault(), mst, resp)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Test the count and contents separately to ensure the count code path is hit.
require.Equal(t, mst.GetImportedServicesCount(), len(tc.exportedServices))
require.ElementsMatch(t, mst.ImportedServices, tc.exportedServices)
}
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
wildcardNS := acl.NewEnterpriseMetaWithPartition(localEntMeta.PartitionOrDefault(), acl.WildcardName)
_, allServices, err := srv.GetStore().ServiceList(nil, &wildcardNS, peerName)
require.NoError(t, err)
// This ensures that only services specified under tc.expect are stored. It includes
// all exported services plus their sidecar proxies.
for _, svc := range allServices {
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
_, ok := tc.expect[svc]
require.True(t, ok)
}
for svc, expect := range tc.expect {
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
t.Run(svc.String(), func(t *testing.T) {
_, got, err := srv.GetStore().CheckServiceNodes(nil, svc.Name, &svc.EnterpriseMeta, peerName)
require.NoError(t, err)
requireEqualInstances(t, expect, got)
})
}
}
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
for _, tc := range tests {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
run(t, tc)
})
}
}
func Test_processResponse_ExportedServiceUpdates(t *testing.T) {
peerName := "billing"
localEntMeta := *acl.DefaultEnterpriseMeta()
remoteMeta := *structs.DefaultEnterpriseMetaInPartition("billing-ap")
pbRemoteMeta := pbcommon.NewEnterpriseMetaFromStructs(remoteMeta)
apiLocalSN := structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta)
redisLocalSN := structs.NewServiceName("redis", &localEntMeta)
tests := []PeeringProcessResponse_testCase{
{
name: "upsert two service instances to the same node",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String()},
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{
Nodes: []*pbservice.CheckServiceNode{
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-1-check",
ServiceID: "api-1",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "api-2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-2-check",
ServiceID: "api-2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
// The remote billing-ap partition is overwritten for all resources with the local default.
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
// The name of the peer "billing" is attached as well.
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-1-check",
ServiceID: "api-1",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-2-check",
ServiceID: "api-2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "deleting a service with an empty exported service event",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String()},
seed: []*structs.RegisterRequest{
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-2",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-2-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{},
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {},
},
},
{
name: "upsert two service instances to different nodes",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String()},
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{
Nodes: []*pbservice.CheckServiceNode{
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-1-check",
ServiceID: "api-1",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "c0f97de9-4e1b-4e80-a1c6-cd8725835ab2",
Node: "node-bar",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "api-2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-bar-check",
Node: "node-bar",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-2-check",
ServiceID: "api-2",
Node: "node-bar",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "c0f97de9-4e1b-4e80-a1c6-cd8725835ab2",
Node: "node-bar",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-bar-check",
Node: "node-bar",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-2-check",
ServiceID: "api-2",
Node: "node-bar",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
// The remote billing-ap partition is overwritten for all resources with the local default.
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
// The name of the peer "billing" is attached as well.
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "api-1-check",
ServiceID: "api-1",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "deleting one service name from a node does not delete other service names",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String(), redisLocalSN.String()},
seed: []*structs.RegisterRequest{
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
CheckID: types.CheckID("redis-2-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-1",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-1-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
// Nil input is for the "api" service.
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {},
// Existing redis service was not affected by deletion.
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("redis", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "redis-2-check",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "unexporting a service does not delete other services",
seed: []*structs.RegisterRequest{
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
CheckID: types.CheckID("redis-2-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2-sidecar-proxy",
Service: "redis-sidecar-proxy",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "redis-2-sidecar-proxy",
CheckID: types.CheckID("redis-2-sidecar-proxy-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-1",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-1-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1-sidecar-proxy",
Service: "api-sidecar-proxy",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-1-sidecar-proxy",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-1-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-sidecar-proxy-check"),
ServiceID: "api-1-sidecar-proxy",
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
// Nil input is for the "api" service.
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{redisLocalSN.String()},
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
// Existing redis service was not affected by deletion.
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("redis", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "redis-2-check",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("redis-sidecar-proxy", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2-sidecar-proxy",
Service: "redis-sidecar-proxy",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "redis-2-sidecar-proxy-check",
ServiceID: "redis-2-sidecar-proxy",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "service checks are cleaned up when not present in a response",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String()},
seed: []*structs.RegisterRequest{
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-1",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-1-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{
Nodes: []*pbservice.CheckServiceNode{
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
// Service check was deleted
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
// Service check should be gone
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "node checks are cleaned up when not present in a response",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String(), redisLocalSN.String()},
seed: []*structs.RegisterRequest{
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
CheckID: types.CheckID("redis-2-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-1",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-1-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{
Nodes: []*pbservice.CheckServiceNode{
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
// Node check was deleted
{
CheckID: "api-1-check",
ServiceID: "api-1",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
// Node check should be gone
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "api-1-check",
ServiceID: "api-1",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("redis", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
CheckID: "redis-2-check",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
},
{
name: "replacing a service instance on a node cleans up the old instance",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
exportedServices: []string{apiLocalSN.String(), redisLocalSN.String()},
seed: []*structs.RegisterRequest{
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
CheckID: types.CheckID("redis-2-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
{
ID: types.NodeID("af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461"),
Node: "node-foo",
PeerName: peerName,
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "api-1",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "api-1",
CheckID: types.CheckID("api-1-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: types.CheckID("node-foo-check"),
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
inputServiceName: structs.NewServiceName("api", &remoteMeta),
input: &pbpeerstream.ExportedService{
Nodes: []*pbservice.CheckServiceNode{
{
Node: &pbservice.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: pbRemoteMeta.Partition,
PeerName: peerName,
},
// New service ID and checks for the api service.
Service: &pbservice.NodeService{
ID: "new-api-v2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: pbRemoteMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*pbservice.HealthCheck{
{
Node: "node-foo",
ServiceID: "new-api-v2",
CheckID: "new-api-v2-check",
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
expect: map[structs.ServiceName]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
structs.NewServiceName("api", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "new-api-v2",
Service: "api",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "new-api-v2-check",
ServiceID: "new-api-v2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
structs.NewServiceName("redis", &localEntMeta): {
{
Node: &structs.Node{
ID: "af913374-68ea-41e5-82e8-6ffd3dffc461",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
Partition: localEntMeta.PartitionOrEmpty(),
PeerName: peerName,
},
Service: &structs.NodeService{
ID: "redis-2",
Service: "redis",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
{
Node: "node-foo",
CheckID: "node-foo-check",
PeerName: peerName,
},
{
CheckID: "redis-2-check",
ServiceID: "redis-2",
Node: "node-foo",
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
EnterpriseMeta: localEntMeta,
PeerName: peerName,
},
},
},
},
},
},
}
Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. (#17235) Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup. This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their proximity in the code. 1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated. 2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node (and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1, combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered. 3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper results.
2023-05-08 18:13:25 +00:00
srv, store := newTestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
backend := c.Backend.(*testStreamBackend)
backend.leader = func() bool {
return false
}
})
processResponse_ExportedServiceUpdates(t, srv, store, localEntMeta, peerName, tests)
}
// TestLogTraceProto tests that all PB trace log helpers redact the
// long-lived SecretStreamID.
// We ensure it gets redacted when logging a ReplicationMessage_Open or a ReplicationMessage.
// In the stream handler we only log the ReplicationMessage_Open, but testing both guards against
// a change in that behavior.
func TestLogTraceProto(t *testing.T) {
type testCase struct {
input proto.Message
}
tt := map[string]testCase{
"replication message": {
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage{
Payload: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open_{
Open: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
},
},
"open message": {
input: &pbpeerstream.ReplicationMessage_Open{
StreamSecretID: testPendingStreamSecretID,
},
},
}
for name, tc := range tt {
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
var b bytes.Buffer
logger, err := logging.Setup(logging.Config{
LogLevel: "TRACE",
}, &b)
require.NoError(t, err)
logTraceRecv(logger, tc.input)
logTraceSend(logger, tc.input)
logTraceProto(logger, tc.input, false)
body, err := io.ReadAll(&b)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NotContains(t, string(body), testPendingStreamSecretID)
})
}
}
func requireEqualInstances(t *testing.T, expect, got structs.CheckServiceNodes) {
t.Helper()
require.Equal(t, len(expect), len(got), "got differing number of instances")
for i := range expect {
// Node equality
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Node.ID, got[i].Node.ID, "node mismatch")
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Node.Partition, got[i].Node.Partition, "partition mismatch")
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Node.PeerName, got[i].Node.PeerName, "peer name mismatch")
// Service equality
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Service.ID, got[i].Service.ID, "service id mismatch")
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Service.PeerName, got[i].Service.PeerName, "peer name mismatch")
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Service.PartitionOrDefault(), got[i].Service.PartitionOrDefault(), "partition mismatch")
// Check equality
require.Equal(t, len(expect[i].Checks), len(got[i].Checks), "got differing number of check")
for j := range expect[i].Checks {
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Checks[j].CheckID, got[i].Checks[j].CheckID, "check id mismatch")
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Checks[j].PeerName, got[i].Checks[j].PeerName, "peer name mismatch")
require.Equal(t, expect[i].Checks[j].PartitionOrDefault(), got[i].Checks[j].PartitionOrDefault(), "partition mismatch")
}
}
}
type testServer struct {
*Server
// mockSnapshotHandler is solely used for handling autopilot events
// which don't come from the state store.
mockSnapshotHandler *mockSnapshotHandler
}
func newTestServer(t *testing.T, configFn func(c *Config)) (*testServer, *state.Store) {
t.Helper()
publisher := stream.NewEventPublisher(10 * time.Second)
store, handler := newStateStore(t, publisher)
ports := freeport.GetN(t, 1) // {grpc}
cfg := Config{
Backend: &testStreamBackend{
store: store,
pub: publisher,
},
GetStore: func() StateStore { return store },
Logger: testutil.Logger(t),
Datacenter: "dc1",
ConnectEnabled: true,
ForwardRPC: noopForwardRPC,
}
if configFn != nil {
configFn(&cfg)
}
grpcServer := grpc.NewServer()
srv := NewServer(cfg)
srv.Register(grpcServer)
var (
grpcPort = ports[0]
grpcAddr = fmt.Sprintf("127.0.0.1:%d", grpcPort)
)
ln, err := net.Listen("tcp", grpcAddr)
require.NoError(t, err)
go func() {
_ = grpcServer.Serve(ln)
}()
t.Cleanup(grpcServer.Stop)
return &testServer{
Server: srv,
mockSnapshotHandler: handler,
}, store
}
func testUUID(t *testing.T) string {
v, err := lib.GenerateUUID(nil)
require.NoError(t, err)
return v
}
func noopForwardRPC(structs.RPCInfo, func(*grpc.ClientConn) error) (bool, error) {
return false, nil
}