luxolus
/
open-consul
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
open-consul/ui-v2/tests/acceptance/dc/kvs/sessions/invalidate.feature

33 lines
1.3 KiB
Gherkin
Raw Normal View History

UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
@setupApplicationTest
Feature: dc / kvs / sessions / invalidate: Invalidate Lock Sessions
In order to invalidate a lock session
As a user
I should be able to invalidate a lock session by clicking a button and confirming
Background:
Given 1 datacenter model with the value "datacenter"
And 1 kv model from yaml
---
Key: key
---
When I visit the kv page for yaml
---
dc: datacenter
kv: key
---
Then the url should be /datacenter/kv/key/edit
Scenario: Invalidating the lock session
And I click delete on the session
And I click confirmDelete on the session
Then the last PUT request was made to "/v1/session/destroy/ee52203d-989f-4f7a-ab5a-2bef004164ca?dc=datacenter"
Then the url should be /datacenter/kv/key/edit
ui: Show the correct message when a session has been removed from a KV (#6167)
2019-07-18 13:29:30 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "notification-deletesession" class
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "success" class
Scenario: Invalidating a lock session and receiving an error
Given the url "/v1/session/destroy/ee52203d-989f-4f7a-ab5a-2bef004164ca?dc=datacenter" responds with a 500 status
And I click delete on the session
And I click confirmDelete on the session
Then the url should be /datacenter/kv/key/edit
ui: Show the correct message when a session has been removed from a KV (#6167)
2019-07-18 13:29:30 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "notification-deletesession" class
UI: Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4572) + (#4573) * Move notification texts to a slightly different layer (#4572) * Further Simplify/refactor the actions/notification layer (#4573) 1. Move the 'with-feedback' actions to a 'with-blocking-action' mixin which better describes what it does 2. Additional set of unit tests almost over the entire layer to prove things work/add confidence for further changes The multiple 'with-action' mixins used for every 'index/edit' combo are now reduced down to only contain the functionality related to their specific routes, i.e. where to redirect. The actual functionality to block and carry out the action and then notify are 'almost' split out so that their respective classes/objects do one thing and one thing 'well'. Mixins are chosen for the moment as the decoration approach used by mixins feels better than multiple levels of inheritence, but I would like to take this fuether in the future to a 'compositional' based approach. There is still possible further work to be done here, but I'm a lot happier now this is reduced down into separate parts.
2018-08-29 18:14:31 +00:00
And "[data-notification]" has the "error" class