333d853b2f
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2022-01-17 22:24:39 +00:00
f487c89b56
cleanup!: Remove prompt buffer implementation for ui.input
...
The `prompt_buffer = true` option will no longer function. The only
input modal implementation will use a normal scratch buffer.
2022-01-11 16:34:27 -08:00
0bb73bc2bd
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-19 04:22:46 +00:00
9b8c2be345
deprecate: input.prompt_buffer option
...
Even once the fixes to the prompt buffer come out in the next version of
Neovim, I'm really not sure what advantages we get from using the prompt
buffer. And we will continue to have disadvantages because it does *not*
function like a normal buffer. If anyone is using it and has a good
reason for it, please let me know. Otherwise, I'll be removing that
functionality in a later commit so I don't have to support two
implementations.
2021-12-17 12:33:50 -08:00
1c314ea68a
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-17 19:21:08 +00:00
4848f851f6
feat(select): allow user to override format_item ( #6 )
2021-12-17 11:20:16 -08:00
15e031c825
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-09 17:14:23 -08:00
189bbc6562
fix(input): adjust implementation to avoid bugs in prompt buffer ( #2 )
2021-12-08 18:52:04 -08:00
6ed0ca5174
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-06 03:26:33 +00:00
cbf7466a85
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-03 12:24:44 +00:00
134445e4a3
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-03 03:53:18 +00:00
106dfb93a3
[docgen] Update README.md
...
skip-checks: true
2021-12-03 03:34:32 +00:00
7f6cf7fb80
Initial commit
2021-12-02 19:30:27 -08:00
Github Actions