mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
synced 2024-11-26 16:30:56 +00:00
06e593376c
Summary: ## Context/Summary Similar to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11288, https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11444, categorizing SST/blob file write according to different io activities allows more insight into the activity. For that, this PR does the following: - Tag different write IOs by passing down and converting WriteOptions to IOOptions - Add new SST_WRITE_MICROS histogram in WritableFileWriter::Append() and breakdown FILE_WRITE_{FLUSH|COMPACTION|DB_OPEN}_MICROS Some related code refactory to make implementation cleaner: - Blob stats - Replace high-level write measurement with low-level WritableFileWriter::Append() measurement for BLOB_DB_BLOB_FILE_WRITE_MICROS. This is to make FILE_WRITE_{FLUSH|COMPACTION|DB_OPEN}_MICROS include blob file. As a consequence, this introduces some behavioral changes on it, see HISTORY and db bench test plan below for more info. - Fix bugs where BLOB_DB_BLOB_FILE_SYNCED/BLOB_DB_BLOB_FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN include file failed to sync and bytes failed to write. - Refactor WriteOptions constructor for easier construction with io_activity and rate_limiter_priority - Refactor DBImpl::~DBImpl()/BlobDBImpl::Close() to bypass thread op verification - Build table - TableBuilderOptions now includes Read/WriteOpitons so BuildTable() do not need to take these two variables - Replace the io_priority passed into BuildTable() with TableBuilderOptions::WriteOpitons::rate_limiter_priority. Similar for BlobFileBuilder. This parameter is used for dynamically changing file io priority for flush, see https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988?fbclid=IwAR1DtKel6c-bRJAdesGo0jsbztRtciByNlvokbxkV6h_L-AE9MACzqRTT5s for more - Update ThreadStatus::FLUSH_BYTES_WRITTEN to use io_activity to track flush IO in flush job and db open instead of io_priority ## Test ### db bench Flush ``` ./db_bench --statistics=1 --benchmarks=fillseq --num=100000 --write_buffer_size=100 rocksdb.sst.write.micros P50 : 1.830863 P95 : 4.094720 P99 : 6.578947 P100 : 26.000000 COUNT : 7875 SUM : 20377 rocksdb.file.write.flush.micros P50 : 1.830863 P95 : 4.094720 P99 : 6.578947 P100 : 26.000000 COUNT : 7875 SUM : 20377 rocksdb.file.write.compaction.micros P50 : 0.000000 P95 : 0.000000 P99 : 0.000000 P100 : 0.000000 COUNT : 0 SUM : 0 rocksdb.file.write.db.open.micros P50 : 0.000000 P95 : 0.000000 P99 : 0.000000 P100 : 0.000000 COUNT : 0 SUM : 0 ``` compaction, db oopen ``` Setup: ./db_bench --statistics=1 --benchmarks=fillseq --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=100 --db=../db_bench Run:./db_bench --statistics=1 --benchmarks=compact --db=../db_bench --use_existing_db=1 rocksdb.sst.write.micros P50 : 2.675325 P95 : 9.578788 P99 : 18.780000 P100 : 314.000000 COUNT : 638 SUM : 3279 rocksdb.file.write.flush.micros P50 : 0.000000 P95 : 0.000000 P99 : 0.000000 P100 : 0.000000 COUNT : 0 SUM : 0 rocksdb.file.write.compaction.micros P50 : 2.757353 P95 : 9.610687 P99 : 19.316667 P100 : 314.000000 COUNT : 615 SUM : 3213 rocksdb.file.write.db.open.micros P50 : 2.055556 P95 : 3.925000 P99 : 9.000000 P100 : 9.000000 COUNT : 23 SUM : 66 ``` blob stats - just to make sure they aren't broken by this PR ``` Integrated Blob DB Setup: ./db_bench --enable_blob_files=1 --statistics=1 --benchmarks=fillseq --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=100 --db=../db_bench Run:./db_bench --enable_blob_files=1 --statistics=1 --benchmarks=compact --db=../db_bench --use_existing_db=1 pre-PR: rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.write.micros P50 : 7.298246 P95 : 9.771930 P99 : 9.991813 P100 : 16.000000 COUNT : 235 SUM : 1600 rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.synced COUNT : 1 rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.bytes.written COUNT : 34842 post-PR: rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.write.micros P50 : 2.000000 P95 : 2.829360 P99 : 2.993779 P100 : 9.000000 COUNT : 707 SUM : 1614 - COUNT is higher and values are smaller as it includes header and footer write - COUNT is 3X higher due to each Append() count as one post-PR, while in pre-PR, 3 Append()s counts as one. See https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11910/files#diff-32b811c0a1c000768cfb2532052b44dc0b3bf82253f3eab078e15ff201a0dabfL157-L164 rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.synced COUNT : 1 (stay the same) rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.bytes.written COUNT : 34842 (stay the same) ``` ``` Stacked Blob DB Run: ./db_bench --use_blob_db=1 --statistics=1 --benchmarks=fillseq --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=100 --db=../db_bench pre-PR: rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.write.micros P50 : 12.808042 P95 : 19.674497 P99 : 28.539683 P100 : 51.000000 COUNT : 10000 SUM : 140876 rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.synced COUNT : 8 rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.bytes.written COUNT : 1043445 post-PR: rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.write.micros P50 : 1.657370 P95 : 2.952175 P99 : 3.877519 P100 : 24.000000 COUNT : 30001 SUM : 67924 - COUNT is higher and values are smaller as it includes header and footer write - COUNT is 3X higher due to each Append() count as one post-PR, while in pre-PR, 3 Append()s counts as one. See https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11910/files#diff-32b811c0a1c000768cfb2532052b44dc0b3bf82253f3eab078e15ff201a0dabfL157-L164 rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.synced COUNT : 8 (stay the same) rocksdb.blobdb.blob.file.bytes.written COUNT : 1043445 (stay the same) ``` ### Rehearsal CI stress test Trigger 3 full runs of all our CI stress tests ### Performance Flush ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./db_basic_bench_pre_pr --benchmark_filter=ManualFlush/key_num:524288/per_key_size:256 --benchmark_repetitions=1000 -- default: 1 thread is used to run benchmark; enable_statistics = true Pre-pr: avg 507515519.3 ns 497686074,499444327,500862543,501389862,502994471,503744435,504142123,504224056,505724198,506610393,506837742,506955122,507695561,507929036,508307733,508312691,508999120,509963561,510142147,510698091,510743096,510769317,510957074,511053311,511371367,511409911,511432960,511642385,511691964,511730908, Post-pr: avg 511971266.5 ns, regressed 0.88% 502744835,506502498,507735420,507929724,508313335,509548582,509994942,510107257,510715603,511046955,511352639,511458478,512117521,512317380,512766303,512972652,513059586,513804934,513808980,514059409,514187369,514389494,514447762,514616464,514622882,514641763,514666265,514716377,514990179,515502408, ``` Compaction ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./db_basic_bench_{pre|post}_pr --benchmark_filter=ManualCompaction/comp_style:0/max_data:134217728/per_key_size:256/enable_statistics:1 --benchmark_repetitions=1000 -- default: 1 thread is used to run benchmark Pre-pr: avg 495346098.30 ns 492118301,493203526,494201411,494336607,495269217,495404950,496402598,497012157,497358370,498153846 Post-pr: avg 504528077.20, regressed 1.85%. "ManualCompaction" include flush so the isolated regression for compaction should be around 1.85-0.88 = 0.97% 502465338,502485945,502541789,502909283,503438601,504143885,506113087,506629423,507160414,507393007 ``` Put with WAL (in case passing WriteOptions slows down this path even without collecting SST write stats) ``` TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./db_basic_bench_pre_pr --benchmark_filter=DBPut/comp_style:0/max_data:107374182400/per_key_size:256/enable_statistics:1/wal:1 --benchmark_repetitions=1000 -- default: 1 thread is used to run benchmark Pre-pr: avg 3848.10 ns 3814,3838,3839,3848,3854,3854,3854,3860,3860,3860 Post-pr: avg 3874.20 ns, regressed 0.68% 3863,3867,3871,3874,3875,3877,3877,3877,3880,3881 ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11910 Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D49788060 Pulled By: hx235 fbshipit-source-id: 79e73699cda5be3b66461687e5147c2484fc5eff |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
behavior_changes | ||
bug_fixes | ||
new_features | ||
performance_improvements | ||
public_api_changes | ||
add.sh | ||
README.txt | ||
release.sh |
Adding release notes -------------------- When adding release notes for the next release, add a file to one of these directories: unreleased_history/new_features unreleased_history/behavior_changes unreleased_history/public_api_changes unreleased_history/bug_fixes with a unique name that makes sense for your change, preferably using the .md extension for syntax highlighting. There is a script to help, as in $ unreleased_history/add.sh unreleased_history/bug_fixes/crash_in_feature.md or simply $ unreleased_history/add.sh will take you through some prompts. The file should usually contain one line of markdown, and "* " is not required, as it will automatically be inserted later if not included at the start of the first line in the file. Extra newlines or missing trailing newlines will also be corrected. The only times release notes should be added directly to HISTORY are if * A release is being amended or corrected after it is already "cut" but not tagged, which should be rare. * A single commit contains a noteworthy change and a patch release version bump Ordering of entries ------------------- Within each group, entries will be included using ls sort order, so important entries could start their file name with a small three digit number like 100pretty_important.md. The ordering of groups such as new_features vs. public_api_changes is hard-coded in unreleased_history/release.sh Updating HISTORY.md with release notes -------------------------------------- The script unreleased_history/release.sh does this. Run the script before updating version.h to the next development release, so that the script will pick up the version being released. You might want to start with $ DRY_RUN=1 unreleased_history/release.sh | less to check for problems and preview the output. Then run $ unreleased_history/release.sh which will git rm some files and modify HISTORY.md. You still need to commit the changes, or revert with the command reported in the output. Why not update HISTORY.md directly? ----------------------------------- First, it was common to hit unnecessary merge conflicts when adding entries to HISTORY.md, which slowed development. Second, when a PR was opened before a release cut and landed after the release cut, it was easy to add the HISTORY entry to the wrong version's history. This new setup completely fixes both of those issues, with perhaps slightly more initial work to create each entry. There is also now an extra step in using `git blame` to map a release note to its source code implementation, but that is a relatively rare operation.