mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
synced 2024-11-28 05:43:50 +00:00
d1ff401472
Summary: For leveled compaction, RocksDB has a special kind of compaction with reason "kBottommmostFiles" that compacts bottommost level files to clear data held by snapshots (more detail in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3009). Such compactions can happen soon after a relevant snapshot is released. For some use cases, a bottommost file may contain only a small amount of keys that can be cleared, so compacting such a file has a high write amp. In addition, these bottommost files may be compacted in compactions with reason other than "kBottommmostFiles" if we wait for some time (so that enough data is ingested to trigger such a compaction). This PR introduces an option `bottommost_file_compaction_delay` to specify the delay of these bottommost level single file compactions. * The main change is in `VersionStorageInfo::ComputeBottommostFilesMarkedForCompaction()` where we only add a file to `bottommost_files_marked_for_compaction_` if it oldest_snapshot is larger than its non-zero largest_seqno **and** the file is old enough. Note that if a file is not old enough but its largest_seqno is less than oldest_snapshot, we exclude it from the calculation of `bottommost_files_mark_threshold_`. This makes the change simpler, but such a file's eligibility for compaction will only be checked the next time `ComputeBottommostFilesMarkedForCompaction()` is called. This happens when a new Version is created (compaction, flush, SetOptions()...), a new enough snapshot is released (`VersionStorageInfo::UpdateOldestSnapshot()`) or when a compaction is picked and compaction score has to be re-calculated. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11701 Test Plan: * Add two unit tests to test when bottommost_file_compaction_delay > 0. * Ran crash test with the new option. Reviewed By: jaykorean, ajkr Differential Revision: D48331564 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: c584f3dc5f6354fce3ed65f4c6366dc450b15ba8 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| behavior_changes | ||
| bug_fixes | ||
| new_features | ||
| performance_improvements | ||
| public_api_changes | ||
| add.sh | ||
| README.txt | ||
| release.sh | ||
Adding release notes -------------------- When adding release notes for the next release, add a file to one of these directories: unreleased_history/new_features unreleased_history/behavior_changes unreleased_history/public_api_changes unreleased_history/bug_fixes with a unique name that makes sense for your change, preferably using the .md extension for syntax highlighting. There is a script to help, as in $ unreleased_history/add.sh unreleased_history/bug_fixes/crash_in_feature.md or simply $ unreleased_history/add.sh will take you through some prompts. The file should usually contain one line of markdown, and "* " is not required, as it will automatically be inserted later if not included at the start of the first line in the file. Extra newlines or missing trailing newlines will also be corrected. The only times release notes should be added directly to HISTORY are if * A release is being amended or corrected after it is already "cut" but not tagged, which should be rare. * A single commit contains a noteworthy change and a patch release version bump Ordering of entries ------------------- Within each group, entries will be included using ls sort order, so important entries could start their file name with a small three digit number like 100pretty_important.md. The ordering of groups such as new_features vs. public_api_changes is hard-coded in unreleased_history/release.sh Updating HISTORY.md with release notes -------------------------------------- The script unreleased_history/release.sh does this. Run the script before updating version.h to the next develpment release, so that the script will pick up the version being released. You might want to start with $ DRY_RUN=1 unreleased_history/release.sh | less to check for problems and preview the output. Then run $ unreleased_history/release.sh which will git rm some files and modify HISTORY.md. You still need to commit the changes, or revert with the command reported in the output. Why not update HISTORY.md directly? ----------------------------------- First, it was common to hit unnecessary merge conflicts when adding entries to HISTORY.md, which slowed development. Second, when a PR was opened before a release cut and landed after the release cut, it was easy to add the HISTORY entry to the wrong version's history. This new setup completely fixes both of those issues, with perhaps slighly more initial work to create each entry. There is also now an extra step in using `git blame` to map a release note to its source code implementation, but that is a relatively rare operation.