mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
synced 2024-11-27 02:44:18 +00:00
94e3beec77
Summary: The previous API comments for LockWAL didn't provide much about why you might want to use it, and didn't really meet what one would infer its contract was. Also, LockWAL was not in db_stress / crash test. In this change: * Implement a counting semantics for LockWAL()+UnlockWAL(), so that they can safely be used concurrently across threads or recursively within a thread. This should make the API much less bug-prone and easier to use. * Make sure no UnlockWAL() is needed after non-OK LockWAL() (to match RocksDB conventions) * Make UnlockWAL() reliably return non-OK when there's no matching LockWAL() (for debug-ability) * Clarify API comments on LockWAL(), UnlockWAL(), FlushWAL(), and SyncWAL(). Their exact meanings are not obvious, and I don't think it's appropriate to talk about implementation mutexes in the API comments, but about what operations might block each other. * Add LockWAL()/UnlockWAL() to db_stress and crash test, mostly to check for assertion failures, but also checks that latest seqno doesn't change while WAL is locked. This is simpler to add when LockWAL() is allowed in multiple threads. * Remove unnecessary use of sync points in test DBWALTest::LockWal. There was a bug during development of above changes that caused this test to fail sporadically, with and without this sync point change. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11143 Test Plan: unit tests added / updated, added to stress/crash test Reviewed By: ajkr Differential Revision: D42848627 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 6d976c51791941a31fd8fbf28b0f82e888d9f4b4 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| checkpoint_impl.cc | ||
| checkpoint_impl.h | ||
| checkpoint_test.cc | ||