mirror of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
70bf5ef093
Summary: Use another static object to join threads instead. This change is motivated by a case in which some code using NewLRUCache() -> ShardedCacheBase -> SemiStructuredUniqueIdGen -> GenerateRawUniqueId() -> Env::Default() was happening during static destruction. I didn't see anything else in PosixEnv or base classes that would cause a problem by not destroying. (WinEnv is already not destroyed; see env_default.cc) Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11538UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior env/env_test.cc:3561:23 in $ ``` Test Plan: test added, which would previously fail with UBSAN: ``` $ ./env_test --gtest_filter=*Destruct* Note: Google Test filter = *Destruct* [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 1 test from EnvTestMisc [ RUN ] EnvTestMisc.StaticDestruction [ OK ] EnvTestMisc.StaticDestruction (0 ms) [----------] 1 test from EnvTestMisc (0 ms total) [----------] Global test environment tear-down [==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (0 ms total) [ PASSED ] 1 test. env/env_test.cc:3561:23: runtime error: member call on address 0x7f7b96671ca8 which does not point to an object of type 'rocksdb::Env' 0x7f7b96671ca8: note: object is of type 'N7rocksdb12ConfigurableE' 00 00 00 00 90 a7 f7 95 7b 7f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vptr for 'N7rocksdb12ConfigurableE' Reviewed By: jowlyzhang Differential Revision: D46737389 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 0f80a443bf799ffc5641e898cf3a75f7d10a987b |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
behavior_changes | ||
bug_fixes | ||
new_features | ||
performance_improvements | ||
public_api_changes | ||
README.txt | ||
add.sh | ||
release.sh |
README.txt
Adding release notes -------------------- When adding release notes for the next release, add a file to one of these directories: unreleased_history/new_features unreleased_history/behavior_changes unreleased_history/public_api_changes unreleased_history/bug_fixes with a unique name that makes sense for your change, preferably using the .md extension for syntax highlighting. There is a script to help, as in $ unreleased_history/add.sh unreleased_history/bug_fixes/crash_in_feature.md or simply $ unreleased_history/add.sh will take you through some prompts. The file should usually contain one line of markdown, and "* " is not required, as it will automatically be inserted later if not included at the start of the first line in the file. Extra newlines or missing trailing newlines will also be corrected. The only times release notes should be added directly to HISTORY are if * A release is being amended or corrected after it is already "cut" but not tagged, which should be rare. * A single commit contains a noteworthy change and a patch release version bump Ordering of entries ------------------- Within each group, entries will be included using ls sort order, so important entries could start their file name with a small three digit number like 100pretty_important.md. The ordering of groups such as new_features vs. public_api_changes is hard-coded in unreleased_history/release.sh Updating HISTORY.md with release notes -------------------------------------- The script unreleased_history/release.sh does this. Run the script before updating version.h to the next develpment release, so that the script will pick up the version being released. You might want to start with $ DRY_RUN=1 unreleased_history/release.sh | less to check for problems and preview the output. Then run $ unreleased_history/release.sh which will git rm some files and modify HISTORY.md. You still need to commit the changes, or revert with the command reported in the output. Why not update HISTORY.md directly? ----------------------------------- First, it was common to hit unnecessary merge conflicts when adding entries to HISTORY.md, which slowed development. Second, when a PR was opened before a release cut and landed after the release cut, it was easy to add the HISTORY entry to the wrong version's history. This new setup completely fixes both of those issues, with perhaps slighly more initial work to create each entry. There is also now an extra step in using `git blame` to map a release note to its source code implementation, but that is a relatively rare operation.