mirror of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
defd97bc9d
Summary: add a new CF option `paranoid_memory_checks` that allows additional data integrity validations during read/scan. Currently, skiplist-based memtable will validate the order of keys visited. Further data validation can be added in different layers. The option will be opt-in due to performance overhead. The motivation for this feature is for services where data correctness is critical and want to detect in-memory corruption earlier. For a corrupted memtable key, this feature can help to detect it during during reads instead of during flush with existing protections (OutputValidator that verifies key order or per kv checksum). See internally linked task for more context. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12889 Test Plan: * new unit test added for paranoid_memory_checks=true. * existing unit test for paranoid_memory_checks=false. * enable in stress test. Performance Benchmark: we check for performance regression in read path where data is in memtable only. For each benchmark, the script was run at the same time for main and this PR: * Memtable-only randomread ops/sec: ``` (for I in $(seq 1 50);do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillseq,readrandom --write_buffer_size=268435456 --writes=250000 --num=250000 --reads=500000 --seed=1723056275 2>&1 | grep "readrandom"; done;) | awk '{ t += $5; c++; print } END { print 1.0 * t / c }'; Main: 608146 PR with paranoid_memory_checks=false: 607727 (- %0.07) PR with paranoid_memory_checks=true: 521889 (-%14.2) ``` * Memtable-only sequential scan ops/sec: ``` (for I in $(seq 1 50); do ./db_bench--benchmarks=fillseq,readseq[-X10] --write_buffer_size=268435456 --num=1000000 --seed=1723056275 2>1 | grep "\[AVG 10 runs\]"; done;) | awk '{ t += $6; c++; print; } END { printf "%.0f\n", 1.0 * t / c }'; Main: 9180077 PR with paranoid_memory_checks=false: 9536241 (+%3.8) PR with paranoid_memory_checks=true: 7653934 (-%16.6) ``` * Memtable-only reverse scan ops/sec: ``` (for I in $(seq 1 20); do ./db_bench --benchmarks=fillseq,readreverse[-X10] --write_buffer_size=268435456 --num=1000000 --seed=1723056275 2>1 | grep "\[AVG 10 runs\]"; done;) | awk '{ t += $6; c++; print; } END { printf "%.0f\n", 1.0 * t / c }'; Main: 1285719 PR with integrity_checks=false: 1431626 (+%11.3) PR with integrity_checks=true: 811031 (-%36.9) ``` The `readrandom` benchmark shows no regression. The scanning benchmarks show improvement that I can't explain. Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D60414267 Pulled By: cbi42 fbshipit-source-id: a70b0cbeea131f1a249a5f78f9dc3a62dacfaa91 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| alloc_tracker.cc | ||
| hash_linklist_rep.cc | ||
| hash_skiplist_rep.cc | ||
| inlineskiplist.h | ||
| inlineskiplist_test.cc | ||
| memtablerep_bench.cc | ||
| skiplist.h | ||
| skiplist_test.cc | ||
| skiplistrep.cc | ||
| stl_wrappers.h | ||
| vectorrep.cc | ||
| write_buffer_manager.cc | ||
| write_buffer_manager_test.cc | ||