mirror of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
485ee4f45c
Summary: Follow-up to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/13106 which revealed that some SST file readers (in addition to blob files) were being essentially leaked in TableCache (until DB::Close() time). Patched sources of leaks: * Flush that is not committed (builder.cc) * Various obsolete SST files picked up by directory scan but not caught by SubcompactionState::Cleanup() cleaning up from some failed compactions. Dozens of unit tests fail without the "backstop" TableCache::Evict() call in PurgeObsoleteFiles(). We also needed to adjust the check for leaks as follows: * Ok if DB::Open never finished (see comment) * Ok if deletions are disabled (see comment) * Allow "quarantined" files to be in table_cache because (presumably) they might become live again. * Get live files from all live Versions. Suggested follow-up: * Potentially delete more obsolete files sooner with a FIXME in db_impl_files.cc. This could potentially be high value because it seems to gate deletion of any/all newer obsolete files on all older compactions finishing. * Try to catch obsolete files in more places using the VersionSet::obsolete_files_ pipeline rather than relying on them being picked up with directory scan, or deleting them outside of normal mechanisms. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/13117 Test Plan: updated check used in most all unit tests in ASAN build Reviewed By: hx235 Differential Revision: D65502988 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: aa0795a8a09d9ec578d25183fe43e2a35849209c |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| behavior_changes | ||
| bug_fixes | ||
| new_features | ||
| performance_improvements | ||
| public_api_changes | ||
| README.txt | ||
| add.sh | ||
| release.sh | ||
README.txt
Adding release notes -------------------- When adding release notes for the next release, add a file to one of these directories: unreleased_history/new_features unreleased_history/behavior_changes unreleased_history/public_api_changes unreleased_history/bug_fixes with a unique name that makes sense for your change, preferably using the .md extension for syntax highlighting. There is a script to help, as in $ unreleased_history/add.sh unreleased_history/bug_fixes/crash_in_feature.md or simply $ unreleased_history/add.sh will take you through some prompts. The file should usually contain one line of markdown, and "* " is not required, as it will automatically be inserted later if not included at the start of the first line in the file. Extra newlines or missing trailing newlines will also be corrected. The only times release notes should be added directly to HISTORY are if * A release is being amended or corrected after it is already "cut" but not tagged, which should be rare. * A single commit contains a noteworthy change and a patch release version bump Ordering of entries ------------------- Within each group, entries will be included using ls sort order, so important entries could start their file name with a small three digit number like 100pretty_important.md. The ordering of groups such as new_features vs. public_api_changes is hard-coded in unreleased_history/release.sh Updating HISTORY.md with release notes -------------------------------------- The script unreleased_history/release.sh does this. Run the script before updating version.h to the next development release, so that the script will pick up the version being released. You might want to start with $ DRY_RUN=1 unreleased_history/release.sh | less to check for problems and preview the output. Then run $ unreleased_history/release.sh which will git rm some files and modify HISTORY.md. You still need to commit the changes, or revert with the command reported in the output. Why not update HISTORY.md directly? ----------------------------------- First, it was common to hit unnecessary merge conflicts when adding entries to HISTORY.md, which slowed development. Second, when a PR was opened before a release cut and landed after the release cut, it was easy to add the HISTORY entry to the wrong version's history. This new setup completely fixes both of those issues, with perhaps slightly more initial work to create each entry. There is also now an extra step in using `git blame` to map a release note to its source code implementation, but that is a relatively rare operation.