mirror of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
900f79126d
Summary: The motivation and benefit of current behavior of passing `LockInfo&&` as argument to AcquireLocked() and AcquireWithTimeout() is not clear to me. Furthermore, in AcquireWithTimeout(), we access members of `LockInfo&&` after it is passed to AcquireLocked() as rvalue ref. In addition, we may call `AcquireLocked()` with `std::move(lock_info)` multiple times. This leads to linter warning of use-after-move. If future implementation of AcquireLocked() does something like moving-construct a new `LockedInfo` using the passed-in `LockInfo&&`, then the caller cannot use it because `LockInfo` has a member of type `autovector`. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10874 Test Plan: make check Reviewed By: ltamasi Differential Revision: D40704210 Pulled By: riversand963 fbshipit-source-id: 20091df65b4fc63b072bcec9809efc49955d6d35 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| point_lock_manager.cc | ||
| point_lock_manager.h | ||
| point_lock_manager_test.cc | ||
| point_lock_manager_test.h | ||
| point_lock_tracker.cc | ||
| point_lock_tracker.h | ||