mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb.git
synced 2024-11-30 22:41:48 +00:00
0bb939611d
Summary: We are seeing a number of crash test failures coming from checkpoint and backup code, likely from WalManager::GetSortedWalFiles -> ... -> WalManager::ReadFirstLine and this code path is not needed, because we don't need to know the sequence numbers of WAL files going into a checkpoint or backup. We can minimize the impact of whatever inconsistency is causing that problem by not relying on it where it's not needed. Similarly, when we only need a roughly accurate set of current WAL files, we don't need to query all the archived WAL files (and redundantly the live ones again). So this reduces filesystem queries and DB mutex acquires in creating backups and checkpoints. Needed follow-up: Figure out what is causing various failures with an apparent inconsistency where GetSortedWalFiles fails on reading a WAL file. If it's an injected failure, perhaps it's not propagating that injected failure appropriately. It might also be an inconsistency between what the DB knows is flushed and what WalManager reads from the filesystem (which we know is dubious and should be phased out, which this is arguably another step toward). Or completing that phase-out might solve the problem without a full diagnosis. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12831 Test Plan: existing tests (easily caught when I went too far in initally developing this change) Update to BackupUsingDirectIO test so that there's a WAL file in what is backed up. (Was relying on some oddity.) Reviewed By: cbi42 Differential Revision: D59252649 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 7ad4187a1c70caa59a6d6c1c643ef95232b929f5 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| behavior_changes | ||
| bug_fixes | ||
| new_features | ||
| performance_improvements | ||
| public_api_changes | ||
| add.sh | ||
| README.txt | ||
| release.sh | ||
Adding release notes -------------------- When adding release notes for the next release, add a file to one of these directories: unreleased_history/new_features unreleased_history/behavior_changes unreleased_history/public_api_changes unreleased_history/bug_fixes with a unique name that makes sense for your change, preferably using the .md extension for syntax highlighting. There is a script to help, as in $ unreleased_history/add.sh unreleased_history/bug_fixes/crash_in_feature.md or simply $ unreleased_history/add.sh will take you through some prompts. The file should usually contain one line of markdown, and "* " is not required, as it will automatically be inserted later if not included at the start of the first line in the file. Extra newlines or missing trailing newlines will also be corrected. The only times release notes should be added directly to HISTORY are if * A release is being amended or corrected after it is already "cut" but not tagged, which should be rare. * A single commit contains a noteworthy change and a patch release version bump Ordering of entries ------------------- Within each group, entries will be included using ls sort order, so important entries could start their file name with a small three digit number like 100pretty_important.md. The ordering of groups such as new_features vs. public_api_changes is hard-coded in unreleased_history/release.sh Updating HISTORY.md with release notes -------------------------------------- The script unreleased_history/release.sh does this. Run the script before updating version.h to the next development release, so that the script will pick up the version being released. You might want to start with $ DRY_RUN=1 unreleased_history/release.sh | less to check for problems and preview the output. Then run $ unreleased_history/release.sh which will git rm some files and modify HISTORY.md. You still need to commit the changes, or revert with the command reported in the output. Why not update HISTORY.md directly? ----------------------------------- First, it was common to hit unnecessary merge conflicts when adding entries to HISTORY.md, which slowed development. Second, when a PR was opened before a release cut and landed after the release cut, it was easy to add the HISTORY entry to the wrong version's history. This new setup completely fixes both of those issues, with perhaps slightly more initial work to create each entry. There is also now an extra step in using `git blame` to map a release note to its source code implementation, but that is a relatively rare operation.