Summary: Use a better way to map from a key with locality to a random location. Now with the same -read_random_exp_range setting, hit rate drops, which it is expected.
Test Plan: ./db_bench --benchmarks=readrandom -statistics -use_existing_db -cache_size=5000000 --read_random_exp_range=<multiple_values>
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, kradhakrishnan, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34761
Summary: Allow GetThreadList() to report the start time of the current operation.
Test Plan:
./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom --num=100000 --threads=40 \
--max_background_compactions=10 --max_background_flushes=3 \
--thread_status_per_interval=1000 --key_size=16 --value_size=1000 \
--num_column_families=10
Sample output:
ThreadID ThreadType cfName Operation OP_StartTime State
140338840797248 High Pri column_family_name_000003 Flush 2015/03/09-17:49:59
140338844991552 High Pri column_family_name_000004 Flush 2015/03/09-17:49:59
140338849185856 Low Pri
140338983403584 Low Pri
140339008569408 Low Pri
140338861768768 Low Pri
140338924683328 Low Pri
140338899517504 Low Pri
140338853380160 Low Pri
140338882740288 Low Pri
140338865963072 High Pri column_family_name_000006 Flush 2015/03/09-17:49:59
140338954043456 Low Pri
140338857574464 Low Pri
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lgalanis, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34689
Summary: Introduce parameter -read_random_exp_range in db_bench to provide some key skewness in readrandom and multireadrandom benchmarks. It will helpful to cover block cache better.
Test Plan:
Run benchmarks with this new parameter. I can clearly see block cache hit rate change while I increase this value (DB size is about 66MB):
./db_bench --benchmarks=readrandom -statistics -use_existing_db -cache_size=5000000 --read_random_exp_range=0.0
rocksdb.block.cache.data.miss COUNT : 958418
rocksdb.block.cache.data.hit COUNT : 41582
./db_bench --benchmarks=readrandom -statistics -use_existing_db -cache_size=5000000 --read_random_exp_range=5.0
rocksdb.block.cache.data.miss COUNT : 819518
rocksdb.block.cache.data.hit COUNT : 180482
./db_bench --benchmarks=readrandom -statistics -use_existing_db -cache_size=5000000 --read_random_exp_range=10.0
rocksdb.block.cache.data.miss COUNT : 450479
rocksdb.block.cache.data.hit COUNT : 549521
./db_bench --benchmarks=readrandom -statistics -use_existing_db -cache_size=5000000 --read_random_exp_range=20.0
rocksdb.block.cache.data.miss COUNT : 223192
rocksdb.block.cache.data.hit COUNT : 776808
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34629
Summary:
Add --thread_status_per_interval to db_bench, which allows
db_bench to optionally enable print the current thread status
periodically.
Test Plan:
./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom --num=100000 --threads=40 --max_background_compactions=10 --max_background_flushes=3 --thread_status_per_interval=1000 --key_size=16 --value_size=1000 --num_column_families=10
Sample output:
ThreadID ThreadType dbName cfName Operation State
140281571770432 Low Pri
140281575964736 High Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000001 Flush
140281710182464 Low Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000008 Compaction
140281638879296 Low Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000007 Compaction
140281592741952 Low Pri
140281580159040 High Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000002 Flush
140281676628032 Low Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000006 Compaction
140281584353344 Low Pri
140281622102080 Low Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000009 Compaction
140281605324864 Low Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench column_family_name_000004 Compaction
140281601130560 High Pri /tmp/rocksdbtest-5297/dbbench default Flush
140281596936256 Low Pri
140281588547648 Low Pri
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34515
Summary:
When having fixed max_bytes_for_level_base, the ratio of size of largest level and the second one can range from 0 to the multiplier. This makes LSM tree frequently irregular and unpredictable. It can also cause poor space amplification in some cases.
In this improvement (proposed by Igor Kabiljo), we introduce a parameter option.level_compaction_use_dynamic_max_bytes. When turning it on, RocksDB is free to pick a level base in the range of (options.max_bytes_for_level_base/options.max_bytes_for_level_multiplier, options.max_bytes_for_level_base] so that real level ratios are close to options.max_bytes_for_level_multiplier.
Test Plan: New unit tests and pass tests suites including valgrind.
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, rven, yhchiang, igor, ikabiljo
Reviewed By: ikabiljo
Subscribers: yoshinorim, ikabiljo, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31437
Summary:
When using latest clang (3.6 or 3.7/trunck) rocksdb is failing with many errors. Almost all of them are missing override errors. This diff adds missing override keyword. No manual changes.
Prerequisites: bear and clang 3.5 build with extra tools
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 bear make all # generate a compilation database http://clang.llvm.org/docs/JSONCompilationDatabase.html
% clang-modernize -p . -include . -add-override
% make format
```
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% #Use default fb code clang.
% make check
```
Verify less error and no missing override errors.
```lang=bash
% # Have trunk clang present in path.
% ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 CC=clang CXX=clang++ make
```
Reviewers: igor, kradhakrishnan, rven, meyering, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34077
Summary:
An old commit (482401) changed DoWrite to use the value of --writes rather
than --num to determine the range for keys. This restores the old and correct
behavior which is to limit it using --num.
Task ID: #6353043
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
run db_bench
Revert Plan:
Database Impact:
Memcache Impact:
Other Notes:
EImportant:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34065
Summary:
The bug is detected by scan-build.
In `void WriteSeqSeekSeq(ThreadState* thread)` memory is allocated in line 3118 `Slice key = AllocateKey();` but `Slice` is not responsible deleting `Slice::data()`.
Added `std::unique_ptr<const char[]>*` parameter to ` AllocateKey()`, so that it requires caller to not forget about Slice::data() management.
scan-build bug report: http://home.fburl.com/~sugak/latest6/report-6e9754.html#EndPath
Test Plan:
Make sure scan-build does not report 'Memory leak' in db/db_bench.cc and all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% make analyze
% make check
```
Reviewers: lgalanis, igor, meyering, sdong
Reviewed By: meyering, sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33501
Summary:
I saw this when running readrandom benchmark with corrupted database -- benchmark worked!
If a Get() returns corruption we should probably abort.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31701
Summary:
This diff adds BlockBasedTable format_version = 2. New format version brings better compressed block format for these compressions:
1) Zlib -- encode decompressed size in compressed block header
2) BZip2 -- encode decompressed size in compressed block header
3) LZ4 and LZ4HC -- instead of doing memcpy of size_t encode size as varint32. memcpy is very bad because the DB is not portable accross big/little endian machines or even platforms where size_t might be 8 or 4 bytes.
It does not affect format for snappy.
If you write a new database with format_version = 2, it will not be readable by RocksDB versions before 3.10. DB::Open() will return corruption in that case.
Test Plan:
Added a new test in db_test.
I will also run db_bench and verify VSIZE when block_cache == 1GB
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, MarkCallaghan, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31461
Summary:
A command line like this to run all the tests:
source benchmark.config.sh && nohup ./benchmark.sh 'bulkload,fillseq,overwrite,filluniquerandom,readrandom,readwhilewriting'
where
benchmark.config.sh is:
export DB_DIR=/data/mysql/rocksdata
export WAL_DIR=/txlogs/rockswal
export OUTPUT_DIR=/root/rocks_benchmarking/output
Will fail for the tests that need a new DB .
Also 1) set disable_data_sync=0 and 2) add debug mode to run through all the tests more quickly
Test Plan: run ./benchmark.sh 'debug,bulkload,fillseq,overwrite,filluniquerandom,readrandom,readwhilewriting' and verify that there are no complaints about WAL dir not being empty.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30909
Summary: CLANG was broken for a recent change in db_ench. Fix it.
Test Plan: Build db_bench using CLANG.
Reviewers: rven, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30801
Summary: Having --num_hot_column_families default on fails some existing regression tests. By default turn it off
Test Plan: Run db_bench to make sure it is default off.
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30705
Summary:
Add option --num_hot_column_families in db_bench. If it is set, write options will first write to that number of column families, and then move on to next set of hot column families. The working set of column families can be smaller than total number of CFs.
It is to test how RocksDB can handle cold column families
Test Plan: Run db_bench with --num_hot_column_families set and not set.
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30663
Summary:
There are two versions of FindObsoleteFiles():
* full scan, which is executed every 6 hours (and it's terribly slow)
* no full scan, which is executed every time a background process finishes and iterator is deleted
This diff is optimizing the second case (no full scan). Here's what we do before the diff:
* Get the list of obsolete files (files with ref==0). Some files in obsolete_files set might actually be live.
* Get the list of live files to avoid deleting files that are live.
* Delete files that are in obsolete_files and not in live_files.
After this diff:
* The only files with ref==0 that are still live are files that have been part of move compaction. Don't include moved files in obsolete_files.
* Get the list of obsolete files (which exclude moved files).
* No need to get the list of live files, since all files in obsolete_files need to be deleted.
I'll post the benchmark results, but you can get the feel of it here: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30123
This depends on D30123.
P.S. We should do full scan only in failure scenarios, not every 6 hours. I'll do this in a follow-up diff.
Test Plan:
One new unit test. Made sure that unit test fails if we don't have a `if (!f->moved)` safeguard in ~Version.
make check
Big number of compactions and flushes:
./db_stress --threads=30 --ops_per_thread=20000000 --max_key=10000 --column_families=20 --clear_column_family_one_in=10000000 --verify_before_write=0 --reopen=15 --max_background_compactions=10 --max_background_flushes=10 --db=/fast-rocksdb-tmp/db_stress --prefixpercent=0 --iterpercent=0 --writepercent=75 --db_write_buffer_size=2000000
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D30249
Summary: When wal_dir is used, DestroyDB is not passed the wal_dir option and so we get a Corruption exception.
Test Plan:
Verified manually that the following command line works now:
./db_bench --db=/mnt/db/rocksdb ... --disable_wal=0 --wal_dir=/data/users/rocksdb/WAL... --benchmarks=filluniquerandom --use_existing_db=0...
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29859
Summary:
Introduces a new class for managing write buffer memory across column
families. We supplement ColumnFamilyOptions::write_buffer_size with
ColumnFamilyOptions::write_buffer, a shared pointer to a WriteBuffer
instance that enforces memory limits before flushing out to disk.
Test Plan: Added SharedWriteBuffer unit test to db_test.cc
Reviewers: sdong, rven, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: tnovak, yhchiang, dhruba, xjin, MarkCallaghan, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22581
Summary:
In some environment such as android, the c++ library does not have
std::to_string. This path adds rocksdb::ToString(), which wraps std::to_string
when std::to_string is not available, and implements std::to_string
in the other case.
Test Plan:
make dbg -j32
./db_test
make clean
make dbg OPT=-DOS_ANDROID -j32
./db_test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29181
Summary: "build all" breaks in Clang mode with db_bench. Fix it.
Test Plan: USE_CLANG=1 make all
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29379
Summary: stringSplit is not how we name our functions. Also, we had two StringSplit's in the codebase
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: yhchiang, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29361
Summary:
Make db_stress built for ROCKSDB_LITE.
The test doesn't pass tough. It seg fault quickly. But I took a look and it doesn't seem to be related to lite version. Likely to be a bug inside RocksDB.
Test Plan: make db_stress
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28797
Summary:
We need to turn on -Wshorten-64-to-32 for mobile. See D1671432 (internal phabricator) for details.
This diff turns on the warning flag and fixes all the errors. There were also some interesting errors that I might call bugs, especially in plain table. Going forward, I think it makes sense to have this flag turned on and be very very careful when converting 64-bit to 32-bit variables.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: ljin, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: bobbaldwin, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28689
Summary:
In D19581 I made `ForwardIterator::status()` check all child iterators,
including immutable ones. It's, however, not necessary to do it every
time -- it'll suffice to check only when they're used and their status
could change.
This diff:
* introduces `immutable_status_` which is updated by `Seek()` and `Next()`
* removes special handling of `kIncomplete` status in those methods
Test Plan:
* `db_test`
* hacked ReadSequential in db_bench.cc to check `status()` in addition to
validity:
```
$ ./db_bench -use_existing_db -benchmarks readseq -disable_auto_compactions \
-use_tailing_iterator # without this patch
Keys: 16 bytes each
Values: 100 bytes each (50 bytes after compression)
Entries: 1000000
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
readseq : 0.562 micros/op 1778103 ops/sec; 98.4 MB/s
$ ./db_bench -use_existing_db -benchmarks readseq -disable_auto_compactions \
-use_tailing_iterator # with the patch
readseq : 0.433 micros/op 2311363 ops/sec; 127.8 MB/s
```
Reviewers: igor, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, march, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24063
Summary: RocksDB already depends on C++11, so we might as well all the goodness that C++11 provides. This means that we don't need AtomicPointer anymore. The less things in port/, the easier it will be to port to other platforms.
Test Plan: make check + careful visual review verifying that NoBarried got memory_order_relaxed, while Acquire/Release methods got memory_order_acquire and memory_order_release
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27543
Summary: Now --bench_size is only used in multireadrandom tests, although the codes allow it to run in all write tests. I don't see a reason why we can't enable it.
Test Plan:
Run
./db_bench -benchmarks multirandomwrite --threads=5 -batch_size=16
and see the stats printed out in LOG to make sure batching really happened.
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25509
Summary:
Add a function as tittle.
Also use the same parameter to fillseekseq too.
Test Plan: Run seekrandom using the new parameter
Reviewers: ljin, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: MarkCallaghan
Subscribers: rven, igor, yhchiang, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D25035
Summary: option max_background_flushes doesn't make sense if thread pool size is not set accordingly. Set the thread pool size as what we do for max_background_compactions.
Test Plan: Run db_bench with max_background_flushes > 1
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, rven, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24717
Summary:
This diff introduces the `lookahead` argument to `SkipListFactory()`. This is an
optimization for the tailing use case which includes many seeks. E.g. consider
the following operations on a skip list iterator:
Seek(x), Next(), Next(), Seek(x+2), Next(), Seek(x+3), Next(), Next(), ...
If `lookahead` is positive, `SkipListRep` will return an iterator which also
keeps track of the previously visited node. Seek() then first does a linear
search starting from that node (up to `lookahead` steps). As in the tailing
example above, this may require fewer than ~log(n) comparisons as with regular
skip list search.
Test Plan:
Added a new benchmark (`fillseekseq`) which simulates the usage pattern. It
first writes N records (with consecutive keys), then measures how much time it
takes to read them by calling `Seek()` and `Next()`.
$ time ./db_bench -num 10000000 -benchmarks fillseekseq -prefix_size 1 \
-key_size 8 -write_buffer_size $[1024*1024*1024] -value_size 50 \
-seekseq_next 2 -skip_list_lookahead=0
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
fillseekseq : 0.389 micros/op 2569047 ops/sec;
real 0m21.806s
user 0m12.106s
sys 0m9.672s
$ time ./db_bench [...] -skip_list_lookahead=2
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
fillseekseq : 0.153 micros/op 6540684 ops/sec;
real 0m19.469s
user 0m10.192s
sys 0m9.252s
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, march, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23997
Summary: Building master on OS X has some compile errors due to implicit type conversions which generate warnings which RocksDB's build settings raise as errors.
Test Plan: It compiles!
Reviewers: ljin, igor
Reviewed By: ljin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24135
Summary: see above
Test Plan:
make check, ran db_bench and looked at output
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Reviewers: igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24189
Summary:
Add the MultiGet API to allow prefetching.
With file size of 1.5G, I configured it to have 0.9 hash ratio that can
fill With 115M keys and result in 2 hash functions, the lookup QPS is
~4.9M/s vs. 3M/s for Get().
It is tricky to set the parameters right. Since files size is determined
by power-of-two factor, that means # of keys is fixed in each file. With
big file size (thus smaller # of files), we will have more chance to
waste lot of space in the last file - lower space utilization as a
result. Using smaller file size can improve the situation, but that
harms lookup speed.
Test Plan: db_bench
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23673
Summary:
Add a CompactedDBImpl that will enabled when calling OpenForReadOnly()
and the DB only has one level (>0) of files. As a performan comparison,
CuckooTable performs 2.1M/s with CompactedDBImpl vs. 1.78M/s with
ReadOnlyDBImpl.
Test Plan: db_bench
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23553
Summary: It contrains the file size to be 4G max with int
Test Plan:
tried to grep instance and made sure other related variables are also
uint64
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23697
Summary:
MurmurHash becomes expensive when we do millions Get() a second in one
thread. Add this option to allow the first hash function to use identity
function as hash function. It results in QPS increase from 3.7M/s to
~4.3M/s. I did not observe improvement for end to end RocksDB
performance. This may be caused by other bottlenecks that I will address
in a separate diff.
Test Plan:
```
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=0
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.272us (3.7 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.138us (7.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.144us (6.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.123us (8.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.112us (8.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.251us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.107us (9.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.099us (10.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.116us (8.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.095us (10.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.096us (10.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.105us (9.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=1
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.230us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.159us (6.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (12.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.218us (4.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
```
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23451
Summary:
1. Make filter_block.h a base class. Derive block_based_filter_block and full_filter_block. The previous one is the traditional filter block. The full_filter_block is newly added. It would generate a filter block that contain all the keys in SST file.
2. When querying a key, table would first check if full_filter is available. If not, it would go to the exact data block and check using block_based filter.
3. User could choose to use full_filter or tradional(block_based_filter). They would be stored in SST file with different meta index name. "filter.filter_policy" or "full_filter.filter_policy". Then, Table reader is able to know the fllter block type.
4. Some optimizations have been done for full_filter_block, thus it requires a different interface compared to the original one in filter_policy.h.
5. Actual implementation of filter bits coding/decoding is placed in util/bloom_impl.cc
Benchmark: base commit 1d23b5c470
Command:
db_bench --db=/dev/shm/rocksdb --num_levels=6 --key_size=20 --prefix_size=20 --keys_per_prefix=0 --value_size=100 --write_buffer_size=134217728 --max_write_buffer_number=2 --target_file_size_base=33554432 --max_bytes_for_level_base=1073741824 --verify_checksum=false --max_background_compactions=4 --use_plain_table=0 --memtablerep=prefix_hash --open_files=-1 --mmap_read=1 --mmap_write=0 --bloom_bits=10 --bloom_locality=1 --memtable_bloom_bits=500000 --compression_type=lz4 --num=393216000 --use_hash_search=1 --block_size=1024 --block_restart_interval=16 --use_existing_db=1 --threads=1 --benchmarks=readrandom —disable_auto_compactions=1
Read QPS increase for about 30% from 2230002 to 2991411.
Test Plan:
make all check
valgrind db_test
db_stress --use_block_based_filter = 0
./auto_sanity_test.sh
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20979
Summary:
That way we can see when this graph goes up and be happy.
Couple of changes:
1. title
2. fix db_bench to delete column families before deleting the DB. this was asserting when compiled in debug mode
3. don't sync manifest when disableDataSync. We discussed this offline. I can move it to separate diff if you'd like
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22815
Summary:
- New Uint64 comparator
- Modify Reader and Builder to take custom user comparators instead of bytewise comparator
- Modify logic for choosing unused user key in builder
- Modify iterator logic in reader
- test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_{builder,reader,db}_test
make check all
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22377
Summary:
I will move compression related options in a separate diff since this
diff is already pretty lengthy.
I guess I will also need to change JNI accordingly :(
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21915
Summary:
Adding num_column_families flag. Adding support for column families in DoWrite and ReadRandom methods.
[Igor, please let me know if this approach sounds good. I shall add it to other methods too.]
Test Plan: Ran fillseq on 1M keys and 10 Column families and ran readrandom.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21387
Summary: Adding flags to use cuckoo table SST in db_bench.cc
Test Plan: Ran benchmark with fillseq and readrandom
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21729
Summary: This is a linux-specific system call.
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: haobo, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21183
