Summary:
folly DistributedMutex is faster than standard mutexes though
imposes some static obligations on usage. See
https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/main/folly/synchronization/DistributedMutex.h
for details. Here we use this alternative for our Cache implementations
(especially LRUCache) for better locking performance, when RocksDB is
compiled with folly.
Also added information about which distributed mutex implementation is
being used to cache_bench output and to DB LOG.
Intended follow-up:
* Use DMutex in more places, perhaps improving API to support non-scoped
locking
* Fix linking with fbcode compiler (needs ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 currently)
Credit: Thanks Siying for reminding me about this line of work that was previously
left unfinished.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10179
Test Plan:
for correctness, existing tests. CircleCI config updated.
Also Meta-internal buck build updated.
For performance, ran simultaneous before & after cache_bench. Out of three
comparison runs, the middle improvement to ops/sec was +21%:
Baseline: USE_CLANG=1 DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make -j24 cache_bench (fbcode
compiler)
```
Complete in 20.201 s; Rough parallel ops/sec = 1584062
Thread ops/sec = 107176
Operation latency (ns):
Count: 32000000 Average: 9257.9421 StdDev: 122412.04
Min: 134 Median: 3623.0493 Max: 56918500
Percentiles: P50: 3623.05 P75: 10288.02 P99: 30219.35 P99.9: 683522.04 P99.99: 7302791.63
```
New: (add USE_FOLLY=1)
```
Complete in 16.674 s; Rough parallel ops/sec = 1919135 (+21%)
Thread ops/sec = 135487
Operation latency (ns):
Count: 32000000 Average: 7304.9294 StdDev: 108530.28
Min: 132 Median: 3777.6012 Max: 91030902
Percentiles: P50: 3777.60 P75: 10169.89 P99: 24504.51 P99.9: 59721.59 P99.99: 1861151.83
```
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D37182983
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: a17eb05f25b832b6a2c1356f5c657e831a5af8d1
Summary:
We make the size of the per-shard hash table fixed. The base level of the hash table is now preallocated with the required capacity. The user must provide an estimate of the size of the values.
Notice that even though the base level becomes fixed, the chains are still dynamic. Overall, the shard capacity mechanisms haven't changed, so we don't need to test this.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10154
Test Plan: `make -j24 check`
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D37124451
Pulled By: guidotag
fbshipit-source-id: cba6ac76052fe0ec60b8ff4211b3de7650e80d0c
Summary:
cache_bench can now run with FastLRUCache.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10095
Test Plan:
- Temporarily add an ``assert(false)`` in the execution path that sets up the FastLRUCache. Run ``make -j24 cache_bench``. Then test the appropriate code is used by running ``./cache_bench -cache_type=fast_lru_cache`` and checking that the assert is called. Repeat for LRUCache.
- Verify that FastLRUCache (currently a clone of LRUCache) has similar latency distribution than LRUCache, by comparing the outputs of ``./cache_bench -cache_type=fast_lru_cache`` and ``./cache_bench -cache_type=lru_cache``.
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D36875834
Pulled By: guidotag
fbshipit-source-id: eb2ad0bb32c2717a258a6ac66ed736e06f826cd8
Summary:
Follow-up to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9126
Added new unit tests to validate some of the claims of guaranteed uniqueness
within certain large bounds.
Also cleaned up the cache_bench -stress-cache-key tool with better comments
and description.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9329
Test Plan: no changes to production code
Reviewed By: mrambacher
Differential Revision: D33269328
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 3a2b684a6b2b15f79dc872e563e3d16563be26de
Summary:
This change standardizes on a new 16-byte cache key format for
block cache (incl compressed and secondary) and persistent cache (but
not table cache and row cache).
The goal is a really fast cache key with practically ideal stability and
uniqueness properties without external dependencies (e.g. from FileSystem).
A fixed key size of 16 bytes should enable future optimizations to the
concurrent hash table for block cache, which is a heavy CPU user /
bottleneck, but there appears to be measurable performance improvement
even with no changes to LRUCache.
This change replaces a lot of disjointed and ugly code handling cache
keys with calls to a simple, clean new internal API (cache_key.h).
(Preserving the old cache key logic under an option would be very ugly
and likely negate the performance gain of the new approach. Complete
replacement carries some inherent risk, but I think that's acceptable
with sufficient analysis and testing.)
The scheme for encoding new cache keys is complicated but explained
in cache_key.cc.
Also: EndianSwapValue is moved to math.h to be next to other bit
operations. (Explains some new include "math.h".) ReverseBits operation
added and unit tests added to hash_test for both.
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/7405 (presuming a root cause)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9126
Test Plan:
### Basic correctness
Several tests needed updates to work with the new functionality, mostly
because we are no longer relying on filesystem for stable cache keys
so table builders & readers need more context info to agree on cache
keys. This functionality is so core, a huge number of existing tests
exercise the cache key functionality.
### Performance
Create db with
`TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./db_bench -bloom_bits=10 -benchmarks=fillrandom -num=3000000 -partition_index_and_filters`
And test performance with
`TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./db_bench -readonly -use_existing_db -bloom_bits=10 -benchmarks=readrandom -num=3000000 -duration=30 -cache_index_and_filter_blocks -cache_size=250000 -threads=4`
using DEBUG_LEVEL=0 and simultaneous before & after runs.
Before ops/sec, avg over 100 runs: 121924
After ops/sec, avg over 100 runs: 125385 (+2.8%)
### Collision probability
I have built a tool, ./cache_bench -stress_cache_key to broadly simulate host-wide cache activity
over many months, by making some pessimistic simplifying assumptions:
* Every generated file has a cache entry for every byte offset in the file (contiguous range of cache keys)
* All of every file is cached for its entire lifetime
We use a simple table with skewed address assignment and replacement on address collision
to simulate files coming & going, with quite a variance (super-Poisson) in ages. Some output
with `./cache_bench -stress_cache_key -sck_keep_bits=40`:
```
Total cache or DBs size: 32TiB Writing 925.926 MiB/s or 76.2939TiB/day
Multiply by 9.22337e+18 to correct for simulation losses (but still assume whole file cached)
```
These come from default settings of 2.5M files per day of 32 MB each, and
`-sck_keep_bits=40` means that to represent a single file, we are only keeping 40 bits of
the 128-bit cache key. With file size of 2\*\*25 contiguous keys (pessimistic), our simulation
is about 2\*\*(128-40-25) or about 9 billion billion times more prone to collision than reality.
More default assumptions, relatively pessimistic:
* 100 DBs in same process (doesn't matter much)
* Re-open DB in same process (new session ID related to old session ID) on average
every 100 files generated
* Restart process (all new session IDs unrelated to old) 24 times per day
After enough data, we get a result at the end:
```
(keep 40 bits) 17 collisions after 2 x 90 days, est 10.5882 days between (9.76592e+19 corrected)
```
If we believe the (pessimistic) simulation and the mathematical generalization, we would need to run a billion machines all for 97 billion days to expect a cache key collision. To help verify that our generalization ("corrected") is robust, we can make our simulation more precise with `-sck_keep_bits=41` and `42`, which takes more running time to get enough data:
```
(keep 41 bits) 16 collisions after 4 x 90 days, est 22.5 days between (1.03763e+20 corrected)
(keep 42 bits) 19 collisions after 10 x 90 days, est 47.3684 days between (1.09224e+20 corrected)
```
The generalized prediction still holds. With the `-sck_randomize` option, we can see that we are beating "random" cache keys (except offsets still non-randomized) by a modest amount (roughly 20x less collision prone than random), which should make us reasonably comfortable even in "degenerate" cases:
```
197 collisions after 1 x 90 days, est 0.456853 days between (4.21372e+18 corrected)
```
I've run other tests to validate other conditions behave as expected, never behaving "worse than random" unless we start chopping off structured data.
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D33171746
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: f16a57e369ed37be5e7e33525ace848d0537c88f
Summary:
This PR adds a ```-secondary_cache_uri``` option to the cache_bench and db_bench tools to allow the user to specify a custom secondary cache URI. The object registry is used to create an instance of the ```SecondaryCache``` object of the type specified in the URI.
The main cache_bench code is packaged into a separate library, similar to db_bench.
An example invocation of db_bench with a secondary cache URI -
```db_bench --env_uri=ws://ws.flash_sandbox.vll1_2/ -db=anand/nvm_cache_2 -use_existing_db=true -benchmarks=readrandom -num=30000000 -key_size=32 -value_size=256 -use_direct_reads=true -cache_size=67108864 -cache_index_and_filter_blocks=true -secondary_cache_uri='cachelibwrapper://filename=/home/anand76/nvm_cache/cache_file;size=2147483648;regionSize=16777216;admPolicy=random;admProbability=1.0;volatileSize=8388608;bktPower=20;lockPower=12' -partition_index_and_filters=true -duration=1800```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8312
Reviewed By: zhichao-cao
Differential Revision: D28544325
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: 8f209b9af900c459dc42daa7a610d5f00176eeed
Peter Dillinger