Summary:
Although we've been tracking SST unique IDs in the DB manifest
unconditionally, checking has been opt-in and with an extra pass at DB::Open
time. This changes the behavior of `verify_sst_unique_id_in_manifest` to
check unique ID against manifest every time an SST file is opened through
table cache (normal DB operations), replacing the explicit pass over files
at DB::Open time. This change also enables the option by default and
removes the "EXPERIMENTAL" designation.
One possible criticism is that the option no longer ensures the integrity
of a DB at Open time. This is far from an all-or-nothing issue. Verifying
the IDs of all SST files hardly ensures all the data in the DB is readable.
(VerifyChecksum is supposed to do that.) Also, with
max_open_files=-1 (default, extremely common), all SST files are
opened at DB::Open time anyway.
Implementation details:
* `VerifySstUniqueIdInManifest()` functions are the extra/explicit pass
that is now removed.
* Unit tests that manipulate/corrupt table properties have to opt out of
this check, because that corrupts the "actual" unique id. (And even for
testing we don't currently have a mechanism to set "no unique id"
in the in-memory file metadata for new files.)
* A lot of other unit test churn relates to (a) default checking on, and
(b) checking on SST open even without DB::Open (e.g. on flush)
* Use `FileMetaData` for more `TableCache` operations (in place of
`FileDescriptor`) so that we have access to the unique_id whenever
we might need to open an SST file. **There is the possibility of
performance impact because we can no longer use the more
localized `fd` part of an `FdWithKeyRange` but instead follow the
`file_metadata` pointer. However, this change (possible regression)
is only done for `GetMemoryUsageByTableReaders`.**
* Removed a completely unnecessary constructor overload of
`TableReaderOptions`
Possible follow-up:
* Verification only happens when opening through table cache. Are there
more places where this should happen?
* Improve error message when there is a file size mismatch vs. manifest
(FIXME added in the appropriate place).
* I'm not sure there's a justification for `FileDescriptor` to be distinct from
`FileMetaData`.
* I'm skeptical that `FdWithKeyRange` really still makes sense for
optimizing some data locality by duplicating some data in memory, but I
could be wrong.
* An unnecessary overload of NewTableReader was recently added, in
the public API nonetheless (though unusable there). It should be cleaned
up to put most things under `TableReaderOptions`.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10532
Test Plan:
updated unit tests
Performance test showing no significant difference (just noise I think):
`./db_bench -benchmarks=readwhilewriting[-X10] -num=3000000 -disable_wal=1 -bloom_bits=8 -write_buffer_size=1000000 -target_file_size_base=1000000`
Before: readwhilewriting [AVG 10 runs] : 68702 (± 6932) ops/sec
After: readwhilewriting [AVG 10 runs] : 68239 (± 7198) ops/sec
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D38765551
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: a827a708155f12344ab2a5c16e7701c7636da4c2
Summary:
Some APIs for getting live files, which are used by Checkpoint
and BackupEngine, can optionally trigger and wait for a flush. These
would deadlock when used on a read-only DB. Here we fix that by assuming
the user wants the overall operation to succeed and is OK without
flushing (because the DB is read-only).
Follow-up work: the same or other issues can be hit by directly invoking
some DB functions that are clearly not appropriate for read-only
instance, but are not covered by overrides in DBImplReadOnly and
CompactedDBImpl. These should be fixed to avoid similar problems on
accidental misuse. (Long term, it would be nice to have a DBReadOnly
class without those members, like BackupEngineReadOnly.)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10569
Test Plan: tests updated to catch regression (hang before the fix)
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D38995759
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: f5f8bc7123e13cb45bd393dd974d7d6eda20bc68
Summary:
Moved linux builds to using docker to avoid CI instability caused by dependency installation site down.
Added the `Dockerfile` which is used to build the image.
The build time is also significantly reduced, because no dependencies installation and with using 2xlarge+ instance for slow build (like tsan test).
Also fixed a few issues detected while building this:
* `DestoryDB()` Status not checked for a few tests
* nullptr might be used in `inlineskiplist.cc`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10496
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D38554200
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: 16e8fb2bf07b9c84bb27fb18421c4d54f2f248fd
Summary:
Change tiered compaction feature from `bottommost_temperture` to
`last_level_temperture`. The old option is kept for migration purpose only,
which is behaving the same as `last_level_temperture` and it will be removed in
the next release.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10471
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D38450621
Pulled By: jay-zhuang
fbshipit-source-id: cc1cdf8bad409376fec0152abc0a64fb72a91527
Summary:
## Problem Summary
RocksDB will acquire the global mutex of db instance for every time when user calls `Write`. When RocksDB schedules a lot of compaction jobs, it will compete the mutex with write thread and it will hurt the write performance.
## Problem Solution:
I want to use log_write_mutex to replace the global mutex in most case so that we do not acquire it in write-thread unless there is a write-stall event or a write-buffer-full event occur.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7516
Test Plan:
1. make check
2. CI
3. COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make db_stress
make crash_test
make crash_test_with_multiops_wp_txn
make crash_test_with_multiops_wc_txn
make crash_test_with_atomic_flush
Reviewed By: siying
Differential Revision: D36908702
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 59b13881f4f5c0a58fd3ca79128a396d9cd98efe
Summary:
We saw flakes with the following failure:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1
utilities/backup/backup_engine_test.cc:2667: Failure
Expected: (restore_time) > (0.8 * rate_limited_restore_time), actual: 48269 vs 60470.4
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'testing::internal::GoogleTestFailureException'
what(): utilities/backup/backup_engine_test.cc:2667: Failure
Expected: (restore_time) > (0.8 * rate_limited_restore_time), actual: 48269 vs 60470.4
Received signal 6 (Aborted)
t/run-backup_engine_test-RateLimiting-BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting-1: line 4: 1032887 Aborted (core dumped) TEST_TMPDIR=$d ./backup_engine_test --gtest_filter=RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1
```
Investigation revealed we forgot to use the mock time `SystemClock` for
restore rate limiting. Then the test used wall clock time, which made
the execution of "GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostTimedWait"
non-deterministic as wall clock time might have advanced enough that
waiting was not needed.
This PR changes restore rate limiting to use
mock time, which guarantees we always execute
"GenericRateLimiter::Request:PostTimedWait". Then the assertions that
rely on times recorded inside that callback should be robust.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10271
Test Plan:
Applied the following patch which guaranteed repro before the fix.
Verified the test passes after this PR even with that patch applied.
```
diff --git a/util/rate_limiter.cc b/util/rate_limiter.cc
index f369e3220..6b3ed82fa 100644
--- a/util/rate_limiter.cc
+++ b/util/rate_limiter.cc
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void GenericRateLimiter::SetBytesPerSecond(int64_t bytes_per_second) {
void GenericRateLimiter::Request(int64_t bytes, const Env::IOPriority pri,
Statistics* stats) {
+ usleep(100000);
assert(bytes <= refill_bytes_per_period_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed));
bytes = std::max(static_cast<int64_t>(0), bytes);
TEST_SYNC_POINT("GenericRateLimiter::Request");
```
Reviewed By: hx235
Differential Revision: D37499848
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: fd790d5a192996be8ba13b656751ccc7d8cb8f6e
Summary:
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9984 changes the behavior of RocksDB: if logger creation failed during `SanitizeOptions()`,
`DB::Open()` will fail. However, since `SanitizeOptions()` is called in `DBImpl::DBImpl()`, we cannot
directly expose the error to caller without some additional work.
This is a first version proposal which:
- Adds a new member `init_logger_creation_s` to `DBImpl` to store the result of init logger creation
- Checks the error during `DB::Open()` and return it to caller if non-ok
This is not very ideal. We can alternatively move the logger creation logic out of the `SanitizeOptions()`.
Since `SanitizeOptions()` is used in other places, we need to check whether this change breaks anything
in case other callers of `SanitizeOptions()` assumes that a logger should be created.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10223
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D37321717
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 58042358a86369d606549dd9938933dd47591c4b
Summary:
For regular db instance and secondary instance, we return error and refuse to open DB if Logger creation fails.
Our current code allows it, but it is really difficult to debug because
there will be no LOG files. The same for OPTIONS file, which will be explored in another PR.
Furthermore, Arena::AllocateAligned(size_t bytes, size_t huge_page_size, Logger* logger) has an
assertion as the following:
```cpp
#ifdef MAP_HUGETLB
if (huge_page_size > 0 && bytes > 0) {
assert(logger != nullptr);
}
#endif
```
It can be removed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9984
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D36347754
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 529798c0511d2eaa2f0fd40cf7e61c4cbc6bc57e
Summary:
**Context:**
`BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting` and `BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup` involve creating backup and restoring of a big database with rate-limiting. Using the normal env with a normal clock requires real elapse of time (13702 - 19848 ms/per test). As suggested in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8722#discussion_r703698603, this PR is to speed it up with SpecialEnv (`time_elapse_only_sleep=true`) where its clock accepts fake elapse of time during rate-limiting (100 - 600 ms/per test)
**Summary:**
- Added TEST_ function to set clock of the default rate limiters in backup engine
- Shrunk testdb by 10 times while keeping it big enough for testing
- Renamed some test variables and reorganized some if-else branch for clarity without changing the test
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9974
Test Plan:
- Run tests pre/post PR the same time to verify the tests are sped up by 90 - 95%
`BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting`
Pre:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 (11123 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 (9441 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 (11096 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 (9339 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 (11121 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 (9413 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 (11185 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 (9511 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (82230 ms total)
```
Post:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 (395 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 (564 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 (358 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 (567 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 (173 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 (176 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 (191 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 (177 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (2601 ms total)
```
`BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup`
Pre:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 (7275 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 (3961 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 (7117 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 (3921 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 (19862 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 (10231 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 (19848 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 (10372 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (82587 ms total)
```
Post:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 (157 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 (152 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 (160 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 (158 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 (155 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 (151 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 (146 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 (153 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (1232 ms total)
```
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D36336345
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 724c6ba745f95f56d4440a6d2f1e4512a2987589
Summary:
ToString() is created as some platform doesn't support std::to_string(). However, we've already used std::to_string() by mistake for 16 months (in db/db_info_dumper.cc). This commit just remove ToString().
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9955
Test Plan: Watch CI tests
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D36176799
fbshipit-source-id: bdb6dcd0e3a3ab96a1ac810f5d0188f684064471
Summary:
Right now we still don't fully use std::numeric_limits but use a macro, mainly for supporting VS 2013. Right now we only support VS 2017 and up so it is not a problem. The code comment claims that MinGW still needs it. We don't have a CI running MinGW so it's hard to validate. since we now require C++17, it's hard to imagine MinGW would still build RocksDB but doesn't support std::numeric_limits<>.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9954
Test Plan: See CI Runs.
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D36173954
fbshipit-source-id: a35a73af17cdcae20e258cdef57fcf29a50b49e0
Summary:
Various renaming and fixes to get rid of remaining uses of
"backupable" which is terminology leftover from the original, flawed
design of BackupableDB. Now any DB can be backed up, using BackupEngine.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9792
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D35334386
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 2108a42b4575c8cccdfd791c549aae93ec2f3329
2022-04-05 09:52:33 -07:00
Renamed from utilities/backupable/backupable_db_test.cc (Browse further)
