Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andrew Kryczka 5d68243e61 Comment out unused variables
Summary:
Submitting on behalf of another employee.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3557

Differential Revision: D7146025

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: 495ca5db5beec3789e671e26f78170957704e77e
2018-03-05 13:13:41 -08:00
Igor Sugak aba3409740 Back out "[codemod] - comment out unused parameters"
Reviewed By: igorsugak

fbshipit-source-id: 4a93675cc1931089ddd574cacdb15d228b1e5f37
2018-02-22 12:43:17 -08:00
David Lai f4a030ce81 - comment out unused parameters
Reviewed By: everiq, igorsugak

Differential Revision: D7046710

fbshipit-source-id: 8e10b1f1e2aecebbfb229c742e214db887e5a461
2018-02-22 09:44:23 -08:00
Sagar Vemuri 72502cf227 Revert "comment out unused parameters"
Summary:
This reverts the previous commit 1d7048c598, which broke the build.

Did a `git revert 1d7048c`.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2627

Differential Revision: D5476473

Pulled By: sagar0

fbshipit-source-id: 4756ff5c0dfc88c17eceb00e02c36176de728d06
2017-07-21 18:26:26 -07:00
Victor Gao 1d7048c598 comment out unused parameters
Summary: This uses `clang-tidy` to comment out unused parameters (in functions, methods and lambdas) in fbcode. Cases that the tool failed to handle are fixed manually.

Reviewed By: igorsugak

Differential Revision: D5454343

fbshipit-source-id: 5dee339b4334e25e963891b519a5aa81fbf627b2
2017-07-21 14:57:44 -07:00
Islam AbdelRahman 68a8e6b8fa Introduce FullMergeV2 (eliminate memcpy from merge operators)
Summary:
This diff update the code to pin the merge operator operands while the merge operation is done, so that we can eliminate the memcpy cost, to do that we need a new public API for FullMerge that replace the std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice>

This diff is stacked on top of D56493 and D56511

In this diff we
- Update FullMergeV2 arguments to be encapsulated in MergeOperationInput and MergeOperationOutput which will make it easier to add new arguments in the future
- Replace std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice> to pass operands
- Replace MergeContext std::deque with std::vector (based on a simple benchmark I ran https://gist.github.com/IslamAbdelRahman/78fc86c9ab9f52b1df791e58943fb187)
- Allow FullMergeV2 output to be an existing operand

```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :       0.607 micros/op 1648235 ops/sec; 16121.2 MB/s
readseq      :       0.478 micros/op 2091546 ops/sec; 20457.2 MB/s
readseq      :       0.252 micros/op 3972081 ops/sec; 38850.5 MB/s
readseq      :       0.237 micros/op 4218328 ops/sec; 41259.0 MB/s
readseq      :       0.247 micros/op 4043927 ops/sec; 39553.2 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :       3.935 micros/op 254140 ops/sec; 2485.7 MB/s
readseq      :       3.722 micros/op 268657 ops/sec; 2627.7 MB/s
readseq      :       3.149 micros/op 317605 ops/sec; 3106.5 MB/s
readseq      :       3.125 micros/op 320024 ops/sec; 3130.1 MB/s
readseq      :       4.075 micros/op 245374 ops/sec; 2400.0 MB/s
```

```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=1000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :       3.472 micros/op 288018 ops/sec; 2817.1 MB/s
readseq      :       2.304 micros/op 434027 ops/sec; 4245.2 MB/s
readseq      :       1.163 micros/op 859845 ops/sec; 8410.0 MB/s
readseq      :       1.192 micros/op 838926 ops/sec; 8205.4 MB/s
readseq      :       1.250 micros/op 800000 ops/sec; 7824.7 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      24.025 micros/op 41623 ops/sec;  407.1 MB/s
readseq      :      18.489 micros/op 54086 ops/sec;  529.0 MB/s
readseq      :      18.693 micros/op 53495 ops/sec;  523.2 MB/s
readseq      :      23.621 micros/op 42335 ops/sec;  414.1 MB/s
readseq      :      18.775 micros/op 53262 ops/sec;  521.0 MB/s

```

```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]

[FullMergeV2]
$ DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions
readseq      :      14.741 micros/op 67837 ops/sec;  663.5 MB/s
readseq      :       1.029 micros/op 971446 ops/sec; 9501.6 MB/s
readseq      :       0.974 micros/op 1026229 ops/sec; 10037.4 MB/s
readseq      :       0.965 micros/op 1036080 ops/sec; 10133.8 MB/s
readseq      :       0.943 micros/op 1060657 ops/sec; 10374.2 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      16.735 micros/op 59755 ops/sec;  584.5 MB/s
readseq      :       3.029 micros/op 330151 ops/sec; 3229.2 MB/s
readseq      :       3.136 micros/op 318883 ops/sec; 3119.0 MB/s
readseq      :       3.065 micros/op 326245 ops/sec; 3191.0 MB/s
readseq      :       3.014 micros/op 331813 ops/sec; 3245.4 MB/s
```

```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10-operands-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :      24.325 micros/op 41109 ops/sec;  402.1 MB/s
readseq      :       1.470 micros/op 680272 ops/sec; 6653.7 MB/s
readseq      :       1.231 micros/op 812347 ops/sec; 7945.5 MB/s
readseq      :       1.091 micros/op 916590 ops/sec; 8965.1 MB/s
readseq      :       1.109 micros/op 901713 ops/sec; 8819.6 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      27.257 micros/op 36687 ops/sec;  358.8 MB/s
readseq      :       4.443 micros/op 225073 ops/sec; 2201.4 MB/s
readseq      :       5.830 micros/op 171526 ops/sec; 1677.7 MB/s
readseq      :       4.173 micros/op 239635 ops/sec; 2343.8 MB/s
readseq      :       4.150 micros/op 240963 ops/sec; 2356.8 MB/s
```

Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make check -j64

Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: lovro, andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57075
2016-07-20 09:49:03 -07:00
Islam AbdelRahman a163cc2d5a Lint everything
Summary:
```
arc2 lint --everything
```

run the linter on the whole code repo to fix exisitng lint issues

Test Plan: make check -j64

Reviewers: sdong, rven, anthony, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang

Reviewed By: yhchiang

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50769
2015-11-16 12:56:21 -08:00
Dmitri Smirnov 18285c1e2f Windows Port from Microsoft
Summary: Make RocksDb build and run on Windows to be functionally
 complete and performant. All existing test cases run with no
 regressions. Performance numbers are in the pull-request.

 Test plan: make all of the existing unit tests pass, obtain perf numbers.

 Co-authored-by: Praveen Rao praveensinghrao@outlook.com
 Co-authored-by: Sherlock Huang baihan.huang@gmail.com
 Co-authored-by: Alex Zinoviev alexander.zinoviev@me.com
 Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov dmitrism@microsoft.com
2015-07-01 16:13:56 -07:00
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang cda4006e87 Enhance partial merge to support multiple arguments
Summary:
* PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands.
* Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum
  number of operands to trigger partial merge.
* This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also
  includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for
  partial merge.

Test Plan:
* make check all
* develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two
  operands.

TODOs (from Schalk):
* Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2.
* Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably
  use results of task #2837810.)
* Add description of problem to doc/index.html.
* Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes.

Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815
2014-03-24 17:57:13 -07:00
Dhruba Borthakur a143ef9b38 Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.

Test Plan: compile rocksdb

Reviewers: emayanke

Reviewed By: emayanke

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
2013-10-04 11:59:26 -07:00
Dhruba Borthakur 1186192ed1 Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.

Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
2013-08-23 10:51:00 -07:00
Deon Nicholas e1346968d8 Merge operator fixes part 1.
Summary:
-Added null checks and revisions to DBIter::MergeValuesNewToOld()
-Added DBIter test to stringappend_test
-Major fix with Merge and TTL
More plans for fixes later.

Test Plan:
-make clean; make stringappend_test -j 32; ./stringappend_test
-make all check;

Reviewers: haobo, emayanke, vamsi, dhruba

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12315
2013-08-19 11:42:47 -07:00
Deon Nicholas ad48c3c262 Benchmarking for Merge Operator
Summary:
Updated db_bench and utilities/merge_operators.h to allow for dynamic benchmarking
of merge operators in db_bench. Added a new test (--benchmarks=mergerandom), which performs
a bunch of random Merge() operations over random keys. Also added a "--merge_operator=" flag
so that the tester can easily benchmark different merge operators. Currently supports
the PutOperator and UInt64Add operator. Support for stringappend or list append may come later.

Test Plan:
	1. make db_bench
	2. Test the PutOperator (simulating Put) as follows:
./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom,readrandom,updaterandom,readrandom,mergerandom,readrandom --merge_operator=put
--threads=2

3. Test the UInt64AddOperator (simulating numeric addition) similarly:
./db_bench --value_size=8 --benchmarks=fillrandom,readrandom,updaterandom,readrandom,mergerandom,readrandom
--merge_operator=uint64add --threads=2

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, MarkCallaghan

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11535
2013-08-15 17:13:07 -07:00
Deon Nicholas c2d7826ced [RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences.
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.

I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.

This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.

NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!

Test Plan:
  -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
  -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
  -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
  -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
  -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
  -A lot of feedback from the reviewers.

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
2013-08-05 20:14:32 -07:00