Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andrew Kryczka d6e016be6d Expose `CacheEntryRole` and map keys for block cache stat collections (#9838)
Summary:
This gives users the ability to examine the map populated by `GetMapProperty()` with property `kBlockCacheEntryStats`. It also sets us up for a possible future where cache reservations are configured according to `CacheEntryRole`s rather than flags coupled to roles.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9838

Test Plan:
- migrated test DBBlockCacheTest.CacheEntryRoleStats to use this API. That test verifies some of the contents are as expected
- added a DBPropertiesTest to verify the public map keys are present, and nothing else

Reviewed By: hx235

Differential Revision: D35629493

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: 5c4356b8560e85d1f881fd32c44c15960b02fc68
2022-04-14 09:38:55 -07:00
Peter Dillinger efd035164b Meta-internal folly integration with F14FastMap (#9546)
Summary:
Especially after updating to C++17, I don't see a compelling case for
*requiring* any folly components in RocksDB. I was able to purge the existing
hard dependencies, and it can be quite difficult to strip out non-trivial components
from folly for use in RocksDB. (The prospect of doing that on F14 has changed
my mind on the best approach here.)

But this change creates an optional integration where we can plug in
components from folly at compile time, starting here with F14FastMap to replace
std::unordered_map when possible (probably no public APIs for example). I have
replaced the biggest CPU users of std::unordered_map with compile-time
pluggable UnorderedMap which will use F14FastMap when USE_FOLLY is set.
USE_FOLLY is always set in the Meta-internal buck build, and a simulation of
that is in the Makefile for public CI testing. A full folly build is not needed, but
checking out the full folly repo is much simpler for getting the dependency,
and anything else we might want to optionally integrate in the future.

Some picky details:
* I don't think the distributed mutex stuff is actually used, so it was easy to remove.
* I implemented an alternative to `folly::constexpr_log2` (which is much easier
in C++17 than C++11) so that I could pull out the hard dependencies on
`ConstexprMath.h`
* I had to add noexcept move constructors/operators to some types to make
F14's complainUnlessNothrowMoveAndDestroy check happy, and I added a
macro to make that easier in some common cases.
* Updated Meta-internal buck build to use folly F14Map (always)

No updates to HISTORY.md nor INSTALL.md as this is not (yet?) considered a
production integration for open source users.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9546

Test Plan:
CircleCI tests updated so that a couple of them use folly.

Most internal unit & stress/crash tests updated to use Meta-internal latest folly.
(Note: they should probably use buck but they currently use Makefile.)

Example performance improvement: when filter partitions are pinned in cache,
they are tracked by PartitionedFilterBlockReader::filter_map_ and we can build
a test that exercises that heavily. Build DB with

```
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -num=10000000 -disable_wal=1 -write_buffer_size=30000000 -bloom_bits=16 -compaction_style=2 -fifo_compaction_max_table_files_size_mb=10000 -fifo_compaction_allow_compaction=0 -partition_index_and_filters
```

and test with (simultaneous runs with & without folly, ~20 times each to see
convergence)

```
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdb ./db_bench_folly -readonly -use_existing_db -benchmarks=readrandom -num=10000000 -bloom_bits=16 -compaction_style=2 -fifo_compaction_max_table_files_size_mb=10000 -fifo_compaction_allow_compaction=0 -partition_index_and_filters -duration=40 -pin_l0_filter_and_index_blocks_in_cache
```

Average ops/s no folly: 26229.2
Average ops/s with folly: 26853.3 (+2.4%)

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D34181736

Pulled By: pdillinger

fbshipit-source-id: ffa6ad5104c2880321d8a1aa7187e00ab0d02e94
2022-04-13 07:34:01 -07:00
Hui Xiao 49623f9c8e Account memory of big memory users in BlockBasedTable in global memory limit (#9748)
Summary:
**Context:**
Through heap profiling, we discovered that `BlockBasedTableReader` objects can accumulate and lead to high memory usage (e.g, `max_open_file = -1`). These memories are currently not saved, not tracked, not constrained and not cache evict-able. As a first step to improve this, similar to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8428,  this PR is to track an estimate of `BlockBasedTableReader` object's memory in block cache and fail future creation if the memory usage exceeds the available space of cache at the time of creation.

**Summary:**
- Approximate big memory users  (`BlockBasedTable::Rep` and `TableProperties` )' memory usage in addition to the existing estimated ones (filter block/index block/un-compression dictionary)
- Charge all of these memory usages to block cache on `BlockBasedTable::Open()` and release them on `~BlockBasedTable()` as there is no memory usage fluctuation of concern in between
- Refactor on CacheReservationManager (and its call-sites) to add concurrent support for BlockBasedTable  used in this PR.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9748

Test Plan:
- New unit tests
- db bench: `OpenDb` : **-0.52% in ms**
  - Setup `./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -disable_auto_compactions=1 -write_buffer_size=1048576`
  - Repeated run with pre-change w/o feature and post-change with feature, benchmark `OpenDb`:  `./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom -use_existing_db=1 -db=/dev/shm/testdb -reserve_table_reader_memory=true (remove this when running w/o feature) -file_opening_threads=3 -open_files=-1 -report_open_timing=true| egrep 'OpenDb:'`

#-run | (feature-off) avg milliseconds | std milliseconds | (feature-on) avg milliseconds | std milliseconds | change (%)
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
10 | 11.4018 | 5.95173 | 9.47788 | 1.57538 | -16.87382694
20 | 9.23746 | 0.841053 | 9.32377 | 1.14074 | 0.9343477536
40 | 9.0876 | 0.671129 | 9.35053 | 1.11713 | 2.893283155
80 | 9.72514 | 2.28459 | 9.52013 | 1.0894 | -2.108041632
160 | 9.74677 | 0.991234 | 9.84743 | 1.73396 | 1.032752389
320 | 10.7297 | 5.11555 | 10.547 | 1.97692 | **-1.70275031**
640 | 11.7092 | 2.36565 | 11.7869 | 2.69377 | **0.6635807741**

-  db bench on write with cost to cache in WriteBufferManager (just in case this PR's CRM refactoring accidentally slows down anything in WBM) : `fillseq` : **+0.54% in micros/op**
`./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq -db=/dev/shm/testdb -disable_auto_compactions=1 -cost_write_buffer_to_cache=true -write_buffer_size=10000000000 | egrep 'fillseq'`

#-run | (pre-PR) avg micros/op | std micros/op | (post-PR)  avg micros/op | std micros/op | change (%)
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
10 | 6.15 | 0.260187 | 6.289 | 0.371192 | 2.260162602
20 | 7.28025 | 0.465402 | 7.37255 | 0.451256 | 1.267813605
40 | 7.06312 | 0.490654 | 7.13803 | 0.478676 | **1.060579461**
80 | 7.14035 | 0.972831 | 7.14196 | 0.92971 | **0.02254791432**

-  filter bench: `bloom filter`: **-0.78% in ms/key**
    - ` ./filter_bench -impl=2 -quick -reserve_table_builder_memory=true | grep 'Build avg'`

#-run | (pre-PR) avg ns/key | std ns/key | (post-PR)  ns/key | std ns/key | change (%)
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
10 | 26.4369 | 0.442182 | 26.3273 | 0.422919 | **-0.4145720565**
20 | 26.4451 | 0.592787 | 26.1419 | 0.62451 | **-1.1465262**

- Crash test `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --reserve_table_reader_memory=1 --cache_size=1` killed as normal

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D35136549

Pulled By: hx235

fbshipit-source-id: 146978858d0f900f43f4eb09bfd3e83195e3be28
2022-04-06 10:33:00 -07:00
Hui Xiao 74544d582f Account Bloom/Ribbon filter construction memory in global memory limit (#9073)
Summary:
Note: This PR is the 4th part of a bigger PR stack (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9073) and will rebase/merge only after the first three PRs (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9070, https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9071, https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9130) merge.

**Context:**
Similar to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8428, this PR is to track memory usage during (new) Bloom Filter (i.e,FastLocalBloom) and Ribbon Filter (i.e, Ribbon128) construction, moving toward the goal of [single global memory limit using block cache capacity](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Projects-Being-Developed#improving-memory-efficiency). It also constrains the size of the banding portion of Ribbon Filter during construction by falling back to Bloom Filter if that banding is, at some point, larger than the available space in the cache under `LRUCacheOptions::strict_capacity_limit=true`.

The option to turn on this feature is `BlockBasedTableOptions::reserve_table_builder_memory = true` which by default is set to `false`. We [decided](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9073#discussion_r741548409) not to have separate option for separate memory user in table building therefore their memory accounting are all bundled under one general option.

**Summary:**
- Reserved/released cache for creation/destruction of three main memory users with the passed-in `FilterBuildingContext::cache_res_mgr` during filter construction:
   - hash entries (i.e`hash_entries`.size(), we bucket-charge hash entries during insertion for performance),
   - banding (Ribbon Filter only, `bytes_coeff_rows` +`bytes_result_rows` + `bytes_backtrack`),
   - final filter (i.e, `mutable_buf`'s size).
      - Implementation details: in order to use `CacheReservationManager::CacheReservationHandle` to account final filter's memory, we have to store the `CacheReservationManager` object and `CacheReservationHandle` for final filter in `XXPH3BitsFilterBuilder` as well as  explicitly delete the filter bits builder when done with the final filter in block based table.
- Added option fo run `filter_bench` with this memory reservation feature

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9073

Test Plan:
- Added new tests in `db_bloom_filter_test` to verify filter construction peak cache reservation under combination of  `BlockBasedTable::Rep::FilterType` (e.g, `kFullFilter`, `kPartitionedFilter`), `BloomFilterPolicy::Mode`(e.g, `kFastLocalBloom`, `kStandard128Ribbon`, `kDeprecatedBlock`) and `BlockBasedTableOptions::reserve_table_builder_memory`
  - To address the concern for slow test: tests with memory reservation under `kFullFilter` + `kStandard128Ribbon` and `kPartitionedFilter` take around **3000 - 6000 ms** and others take around **1500 - 2000 ms**, in total adding **20000 - 25000 ms** to the test suit running locally
- Added new test in `bloom_test` to verify Ribbon Filter fallback on large banding in FullFilter
- Added test in `filter_bench` to verify that this feature does not significantly slow down Bloom/Ribbon Filter construction speed. Local result averaged over **20** run as below:
   - FastLocalBloom
      - baseline `./filter_bench -impl=2 -quick -runs 20 | grep 'Build avg'`:
         - **Build avg ns/key: 29.56295** (DEBUG_LEVEL=1), **29.98153** (DEBUG_LEVEL=0)
      - new feature (expected to be similar as above)`./filter_bench -impl=2 -quick -runs 20 -reserve_table_builder_memory=true | grep 'Build avg'`:
         - **Build avg ns/key: 30.99046** (DEBUG_LEVEL=1), **30.48867** (DEBUG_LEVEL=0)
      - new feature of RibbonFilter with fallback  (expected to be similar as above) `./filter_bench -impl=2 -quick -runs 20 -reserve_table_builder_memory=true -strict_capacity_limit=true | grep 'Build avg'` :
         - **Build avg ns/key: 31.146975** (DEBUG_LEVEL=1), **30.08165** (DEBUG_LEVEL=0)

    - Ribbon128
       - baseline `./filter_bench -impl=3 -quick -runs 20 | grep 'Build avg'`:
           - **Build avg ns/key: 129.17585** (DEBUG_LEVEL=1), **130.5225** (DEBUG_LEVEL=0)
       - new feature  (expected to be similar as above) `./filter_bench -impl=3 -quick -runs 20 -reserve_table_builder_memory=true | grep 'Build avg' `:
           - **Build avg ns/key: 131.61645** (DEBUG_LEVEL=1), **132.98075** (DEBUG_LEVEL=0)
       - new feature of RibbonFilter with fallback (expected to be a lot faster than above due to fallback) `./filter_bench -impl=3 -quick -runs 20 -reserve_table_builder_memory=true -strict_capacity_limit=true | grep 'Build avg'` :
          - **Build avg ns/key: 52.032965** (DEBUG_LEVEL=1), **52.597825** (DEBUG_LEVEL=0)
          - And the warning message of `"Cache reservation for Ribbon filter banding failed due to cache full"` is indeed logged to console.

Reviewed By: pdillinger

Differential Revision: D31991348

Pulled By: hx235

fbshipit-source-id: 9336b2c60f44d530063da518ceaf56dac5f9df8e
2021-11-18 09:42:20 -08:00
Hui Xiao 91b95cadee Account for dictionary-building buffer in global memory limit (#8428)
Summary:
Context:
Some data blocks are temporarily buffered in memory in BlockBasedTableBuilder for building compression dictionary used in data block compression. Currently this memory usage is not counted toward our global memory usage utilizing block cache capacity. To improve that, this PR charges that memory usage into the block cache to achieve better memory tracking and limiting.

- Reserve memory in block cache for buffered data blocks that are used to build a compression dictionary
- Release all the memory associated with buffering the data blocks mentioned above in EnterUnbuffered(), which is called when (a) buffer limit is exceeded after buffering OR (b) the block cache becomes full after reservation OR (c) BlockBasedTableBuilder calls Finish()

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8428

Test Plan:
- Passing existing unit tests
- Passing new unit tests

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D30755305

Pulled By: hx235

fbshipit-source-id: 6e66665020b775154a94c4c5e0f2adaeaff13981
2021-09-08 12:35:46 -07:00
Peter Dillinger 311a544c2a Use deleters to label cache entries and collect stats (#8297)
Summary:
This change gathers and publishes statistics about the
kinds of items in block cache. This is especially important for
profiling relative usage of cache by index vs. filter vs. data blocks.
It works by iterating over the cache during periodic stats dump
(InternalStats, stats_dump_period_sec) or on demand when
DB::Get(Map)Property(kBlockCacheEntryStats), except that for
efficiency and sharing among column families, saved data from
the last scan is used when the data is not considered too old.

The new information can be seen in info LOG, for example:

    Block cache LRUCache@0x7fca62229330 capacity: 95.37 MB collections: 8 last_copies: 0 last_secs: 0.00178 secs_since: 0
    Block cache entry stats(count,size,portion): DataBlock(7092,28.24 MB,29.6136%) FilterBlock(215,867.90 KB,0.888728%) FilterMetaBlock(2,5.31 KB,0.00544%) IndexBlock(217,180.11 KB,0.184432%) WriteBuffer(1,256.00 KB,0.262144%) Misc(1,0.00 KB,0%)

And also through DB::GetProperty and GetMapProperty (here using
ldb just for demonstration):

    $ ./ldb --db=/dev/shm/dbbench/ get_property rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.data-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.deprecated-filter-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.filter-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.filter-meta-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.index-block: 178992
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.misc: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.other-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.bytes.write-buffer: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.capacity: 8388608
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.data-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.deprecated-filter-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.filter-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.filter-meta-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.index-block: 215
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.misc: 1
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.other-block: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.count.write-buffer: 0
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.id: LRUCache@0x7f3636661290
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.data-block: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.deprecated-filter-block: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.filter-block: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.filter-meta-block: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.index-block: 2.133751
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.misc: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.other-block: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.percent.write-buffer: 0.000000
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.secs_for_last_collection: 0.000052
    rocksdb.block-cache-entry-stats.secs_since_last_collection: 0

Solution detail - We need some way to flag what kind of blocks each
entry belongs to, preferably without changing the Cache API.
One of the complications is that Cache is a general interface that could
have other users that don't adhere to whichever convention we decide
on for keys and values. Or we would pay for an extra field in the Handle
that would only be used for this purpose.

This change uses a back-door approach, the deleter, to indicate the
"role" of a Cache entry (in addition to the value type, implicitly).
This has the added benefit of ensuring proper code origin whenever we
recognize a particular role for a cache entry; if the entry came from
some other part of the code, it will use an unrecognized deleter, which
we simply attribute to the "Misc" role.

An internal API makes for simple instantiation and automatic
registration of Cache deleters for a given value type and "role".

Another internal API, CacheEntryStatsCollector, solves the problem of
caching the results of a scan and sharing them, to ensure scans are
neither excessive nor redundant so as not to harm Cache performance.

Because code is added to BlocklikeTraits, it is pulled out of
block_based_table_reader.cc into its own file.

This is a reformulation of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8276, without the type checking option
(could still be added), and with actual stat gathering.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8297

Test Plan: manual testing with db_bench, and a couple of basic unit tests

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D28488721

Pulled By: pdillinger

fbshipit-source-id: 472f524a9691b5afb107934be2d41d84f2b129fb
2021-05-19 16:51:13 -07:00