Summary:
Currently it's easy to use a ton of memory with many small OptimisticTransactionDB instances, because each one by default allocates a million mutexes (40 bytes each on my compiler) for validating transactions. It even puts a lot of pressure on the allocator by allocating each one individually!
In this change:
* Create a new object and option that enables sharing these buckets of mutexes between instances. This is generally good for load balancing potential contention as various DBs become hotter or colder with txn writes. About the only cases where this sharing wouldn't make sense (e.g. each DB usually written by one thread) are cases that would be better off with OccValidationPolicy::kValidateSerial which doesn't use the buckets anyway.
* Allocate the mutexes in a contiguous array, for efficiency
* Add an option to ensure the mutexes are cache-aligned. In several other places we use cache-aligned mutexes but OptimisticTransactionDB historically does not. It should be a space-time trade-off the user can choose.
* Provide some visibility into the memory used by the mutex buckets with an ApproximateMemoryUsage() function (also used in unit testing)
* Share code with other users of "striped" mutexes, appropriate refactoring for customization & efficiency (e.g. using FastRange instead of modulus)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11439
Test Plan: unit tests added. Ran sized-up versions of stress test in unit test, including a before-and-after performance test showing no consistent difference. (NOTE: OptimisticTransactionDB not currently covered by db_stress!)
Reviewed By: ltamasi
Differential Revision: D45796393
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: ae2b3a26ad91ceeec15debcdc63ff48df6736a54
Summary:
We haven't been actively mantaining RocksDB LITE recently and the size must have been gone up significantly. We are removing the support.
Most of changes were done through following comments:
unifdef -m -UROCKSDB_LITE `git grep -l ROCKSDB_LITE | egrep '[.](cc|h)'`
by Peter Dillinger. Others changes were manually applied to build scripts, CircleCI manifests, ROCKSDB_LITE is used in an expression and file db_stress_test_base.cc.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11147
Test Plan: See CI
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D42796341
fbshipit-source-id: 4920e15fc2060c2cd2221330a6d0e5e65d4b7fe2
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
This is a continuation of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5320/files
I open a new mr for these purposes, half a year has past since the old mr is posted so it's almost impossible to fulfill some points below on the old mr, especially 5)
1) add validation modes for optimistic txns
2) modify unittests to test both modes
3) make format
4) refine hash functor
5) push to master
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6240
Differential Revision: D19301296
fbshipit-source-id: 5b5b3cbd39558f43947f7d2dec6cd31a06386edb
Summary:
MyRocks currently sets `max_write_buffer_number_to_maintain` in order to maintain enough history for transaction conflict checking. The effectiveness of this approach depends on the size of memtables. When memtables are small, it may not keep enough history; when memtables are large, this may consume too much memory.
We are proposing a new way to configure memtable list history: by limiting the memory usage of immutable memtables. The new option is `max_write_buffer_size_to_maintain` and it will take precedence over the old `max_write_buffer_number_to_maintain` if they are both set to non-zero values. The new option accounts for the total memory usage of flushed immutable memtables and mutable memtable. When the total usage exceeds the limit, RocksDB may start dropping immutable memtables (which is also called trimming history), starting from the oldest one.
The semantics of the old option actually works both as an upper bound and lower bound. History trimming will start if number of immutable memtables exceeds the limit, but it will never go below (limit-1) due to history trimming.
In order the mimic the behavior with the new option, history trimming will stop if dropping the next immutable memtable causes the total memory usage go below the size limit. For example, assuming the size limit is set to 64MB, and there are 3 immutable memtables with sizes of 20, 30, 30. Although the total memory usage is 80MB > 64MB, dropping the oldest memtable will reduce the memory usage to 60MB < 64MB, so in this case no memtable will be dropped.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5022
Differential Revision: D14394062
Pulled By: miasantreble
fbshipit-source-id: 60457a509c6af89d0993f988c9b5c2aa9e45f5c5
Summary:
This patch splits Commit and Prepare into lock-related logic and db-write-related logic. It moves lock-related logic to PessimisticTransaction to be reused by all children classes and movies the existing impl of db-write-related to PrepareInternal, CommitSingleInternal, and CommitInternal in WriteCommittedTxnImpl.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2691
Differential Revision: D5569464
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: d1b8698e69801a4126c7bc211745d05c636f5325
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions. This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913. This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.
MyRocks folks: please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.
Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint(). After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex. We can then decide which route is preferable.
Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.
Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
Summary: Optimistic transactions supporting begin/commit/rollback semantics. Currently relies on checking the memtable to determine if there are any collisions at commit time. Not yet implemented would be a way of enuring the memtable has some minimum amount of history so that we won't fail to commit when the memtable is empty. You should probably start with transaction.h to get an overview of what is currently supported.
Test Plan: Added a new test, but still need to look into stress testing.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: adamretter, MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33435
Peter Dillinger