Summary:
As discussed in our internal group, we don't get much use of seek compaction at the moment, while it's making code more complicated and slower in some cases.
This diff removes seek compaction and (hopefully) all code that was introduced to support seek compaction.
There is one test case that relied on didIO information. I'll try to find another way to implement it.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong, haobo, yhchiang, ljin, dhruba
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19161
Summary:
We should clean up after ourselves. Last crashtest failed because the disk on the cibuild machine was full.
Also, db_crashtest is supposed to run the test on the same database in every iteration. This isn't the case currently, because every run creates a new tmp directory. It's fixed with this diff.
Test Plan: ran it
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17073
Summary:
Hash skip list has issues, causing db_stress to fail badly.
For now, switching back to skip_list by default before we figure out root cause.
Test Plan: db_stress is happy(ier)
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16845
Summary: Syncing in stress test makes it run much much much slower. It also doesn't add much value IMO.
Test Plan: no
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16839
Summary:
*) fixed the comment
*) constant 1 was not casted to 64-bit, which (I think) might cause overflow if we shift it too much
*) default prefix size to be 7, like it was before
Test Plan: compiled
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16827
Summary: Fix the db_stress test, let is run with HashSkipList for real
Test Plan:
python tools/db_crashtest.py
python tools/db_crashtest2.py
Reviewers: igor, haobo
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16773
Summary:
Why don't we automatically reopen DB when running crash test (running in our nightly build)? If I understand correctly, crashtest is manually reopenning the DB, but then the DB does not check its consistency when you kill db_stress process and then re-run it again.
Does this make sense?
Test Plan: not reall
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16167
Summary: Adding in the iterpercent flag to tests.
Test Plan: make crash_test
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13035
Summary:
Most code change in this diff is code cleanup/rewrite. The logic changes include:
(1) add universal compaction to db_crashtest2.py
(2) randomly set --test_batches_snapshots to be 0 or 1 in db_crashtest2.py. Old codes always use 1.
(3) use different tmp directory as db directory in different runs. I saw some intermittent errors in my local tests. Use of different tmp directory seems to be able to solve the issue.
Test Plan: Have run "make crashtest" for multiple times. Also run "make all check"
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12369
Summary: I changed the db_stress configs, but forgot to update the scripts using the old configs.
Test Plan: 'make blackbox_crash_test' and 'make whitebox_crash_test' start running normally now (I haven't run them til the end, though).
Reviewers: vamsi
Reviewed By: vamsi
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12303
Summary: filter_deletes options introduced in db_stress makes it drop Deletes on key if KeyMayExist(key) returns false on the key. code change was simple and tested so not wasting reviewer's time.
Test Plan: maek crash_test; python tools/db_crashtest[1|2].py
CC: dhruba, vamsi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11769
Summary: As title, now that db_stress supports --map_read properly
Test Plan: make crash_test
Reviewers: vamsi, emayanke, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11391
Summary: These extra options caught some bugs. Will be run via Jenkins now with the crash_test
Test Plan: ./make crashtest
Reviewers: dhruba, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11151
Summary:
I think the check for "error" that I added had caused
false alarm. Fixed that.
Test Plan:
Revert Plan: OK
Task ID: #
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba
Reviewed By: emayanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11139
Summary:
This is initial version. A few ways in which this could
be extended in the future are:
(a) Killing from more places in source code
(b) Hashing stack and using that hash in determining whether to crash.
This is to avoid crashing more often at source lines that are executed
more often.
(c) Raising exceptions or returning errors instead of killing
Test Plan:
This whole thing is for testing.
Here is part of output:
python2.7 tools/db_crashtest2.py -d 600
Running db_stress
db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5
Number of threads : 32
Ops per thread : 10000000
Read percentage : 50
Write-buffer-size : 4194304
Delete percentage : 30
Max key : 1000
Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000
Num times DB reopens: 0
Batches/snapshots : 1
Purge redundant % : 50
Num keys per lock : 4
Compression : snappy
------------------------------------------------
No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set
2013/04/26-17:55:17 Starting database operations
Created bg thread 0x7fc1f07ff700
... finished 60000 ops
Running db_stress
db_stress retncode -15 output LevelDB version : 1.5
Number of threads : 32
Ops per thread : 10000000
Read percentage : 50
Write-buffer-size : 4194304
Delete percentage : 30
Max key : 1000
Ratio #ops/#keys : 320000
Num times DB reopens: 0
Batches/snapshots : 1
Purge redundant % : 50
Num keys per lock : 4
Compression : snappy
------------------------------------------------
Created bg thread 0x7ff0137ff700
No lock creation because test_batches_snapshots set
2013/04/26-17:56:15 Starting database operations
... finished 90000 ops
Revert Plan: OK
Task ID: #2252691
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D10581
