Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andres Notzli 1d20fa9d0f Fixed and simplified merge_helper
Summary:
MergeUntil was not reporting a success when merging an operand with
a Value/Deletion despite the comments in MergeHelper and CompactionJob
indicating otherwise. This lead to operands being written to the compaction
output unnecessarily:

M1 M2 M3 P M4 M5 --> (P+M1+M2+M3) M2 M3 M4 M5 (before the diff)
M1 M2 M3 P M4 M5 --> (P+M1+M2+M3) M4 M5 (after the diff)

In addition, the code handling Values/Deletion was basically identical.
This patch unifies the code. Finally, this patch also adds testing for
merge_helper.

Test Plan: make && make check

Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang, tnovak, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: tnovak, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42351
2015-07-17 09:27:24 -07:00
sdong f9728640f3 "make format" against last 10 commits
Summary: This helps Windows port to format their changes, as discussed. Might have formatted some other codes too becasue last 10 commits include more.

Test Plan: Build it.

Reviewers: anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41961
2015-07-13 13:50:18 -07:00
Dmitri Smirnov 18285c1e2f Windows Port from Microsoft
Summary: Make RocksDb build and run on Windows to be functionally
 complete and performant. All existing test cases run with no
 regressions. Performance numbers are in the pull-request.

 Test plan: make all of the existing unit tests pass, obtain perf numbers.

 Co-authored-by: Praveen Rao praveensinghrao@outlook.com
 Co-authored-by: Sherlock Huang baihan.huang@gmail.com
 Co-authored-by: Alex Zinoviev alexander.zinoviev@me.com
 Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov dmitrism@microsoft.com
2015-07-01 16:13:56 -07:00
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang 6afafa3694 Apply InfoLogLevel to the logs in utilities/merge_operators/uint64add.cc
Summary:
Apply InfoLogLevel to the logs and add missing copy-right information
to  utilities/merge_operators/uint64add.cc.

Test Plan: make

Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27897
2014-10-29 17:10:21 -07:00
Pascal Borreli 443e04e62d Fixed typos 2013-11-16 11:21:34 +00:00
Dhruba Borthakur a143ef9b38 Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.

Test Plan: compile rocksdb

Reviewers: emayanke

Reviewed By: emayanke

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
2013-10-04 11:59:26 -07:00
Dhruba Borthakur 1186192ed1 Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.

Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
2013-08-23 10:51:00 -07:00
Deon Nicholas c2d7826ced [RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences.
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.

I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.

This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.

NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!

Test Plan:
  -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
  -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
  -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
  -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
  -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
  -A lot of feedback from the reviewers.

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
2013-08-05 20:14:32 -07:00
Haobo Xu 05e8854085 [Rocksdb] Support Merge operation in rocksdb
Summary:
This diff introduces a new Merge operation into rocksdb.
The purpose of this review is mostly getting feedback from the team (everyone please) on the design.

Please focus on the four files under include/leveldb/, as they spell the client visible interface change.
include/leveldb/db.h
include/leveldb/merge_operator.h
include/leveldb/options.h
include/leveldb/write_batch.h

Please go over local/my_test.cc carefully, as it is a concerete use case.

Please also review the impelmentation files to see if the straw man implementation makes sense.

Note that, the diff does pass all make check and truly supports forward iterator over db and a version
of Get that's based on iterator.

Future work:
- Integration with compaction
- A raw Get implementation

I am working on a wiki that explains the design and implementation choices, but coding comes
just naturally and I think it might be a good idea to share the code earlier. The code is
heavily commented.

Test Plan: run all local tests

Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang

Reviewed By: dhruba

CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki, emayanke, MarkCallaghan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9651
2013-05-03 16:59:02 -07:00