Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Islam AbdelRahman 68a8e6b8fa Introduce FullMergeV2 (eliminate memcpy from merge operators)
Summary:
This diff update the code to pin the merge operator operands while the merge operation is done, so that we can eliminate the memcpy cost, to do that we need a new public API for FullMerge that replace the std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice>

This diff is stacked on top of D56493 and D56511

In this diff we
- Update FullMergeV2 arguments to be encapsulated in MergeOperationInput and MergeOperationOutput which will make it easier to add new arguments in the future
- Replace std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice> to pass operands
- Replace MergeContext std::deque with std::vector (based on a simple benchmark I ran https://gist.github.com/IslamAbdelRahman/78fc86c9ab9f52b1df791e58943fb187)
- Allow FullMergeV2 output to be an existing operand

```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :       0.607 micros/op 1648235 ops/sec; 16121.2 MB/s
readseq      :       0.478 micros/op 2091546 ops/sec; 20457.2 MB/s
readseq      :       0.252 micros/op 3972081 ops/sec; 38850.5 MB/s
readseq      :       0.237 micros/op 4218328 ops/sec; 41259.0 MB/s
readseq      :       0.247 micros/op 4043927 ops/sec; 39553.2 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :       3.935 micros/op 254140 ops/sec; 2485.7 MB/s
readseq      :       3.722 micros/op 268657 ops/sec; 2627.7 MB/s
readseq      :       3.149 micros/op 317605 ops/sec; 3106.5 MB/s
readseq      :       3.125 micros/op 320024 ops/sec; 3130.1 MB/s
readseq      :       4.075 micros/op 245374 ops/sec; 2400.0 MB/s
```

```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=1000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :       3.472 micros/op 288018 ops/sec; 2817.1 MB/s
readseq      :       2.304 micros/op 434027 ops/sec; 4245.2 MB/s
readseq      :       1.163 micros/op 859845 ops/sec; 8410.0 MB/s
readseq      :       1.192 micros/op 838926 ops/sec; 8205.4 MB/s
readseq      :       1.250 micros/op 800000 ops/sec; 7824.7 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      24.025 micros/op 41623 ops/sec;  407.1 MB/s
readseq      :      18.489 micros/op 54086 ops/sec;  529.0 MB/s
readseq      :      18.693 micros/op 53495 ops/sec;  523.2 MB/s
readseq      :      23.621 micros/op 42335 ops/sec;  414.1 MB/s
readseq      :      18.775 micros/op 53262 ops/sec;  521.0 MB/s

```

```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]

[FullMergeV2]
$ DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions
readseq      :      14.741 micros/op 67837 ops/sec;  663.5 MB/s
readseq      :       1.029 micros/op 971446 ops/sec; 9501.6 MB/s
readseq      :       0.974 micros/op 1026229 ops/sec; 10037.4 MB/s
readseq      :       0.965 micros/op 1036080 ops/sec; 10133.8 MB/s
readseq      :       0.943 micros/op 1060657 ops/sec; 10374.2 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      16.735 micros/op 59755 ops/sec;  584.5 MB/s
readseq      :       3.029 micros/op 330151 ops/sec; 3229.2 MB/s
readseq      :       3.136 micros/op 318883 ops/sec; 3119.0 MB/s
readseq      :       3.065 micros/op 326245 ops/sec; 3191.0 MB/s
readseq      :       3.014 micros/op 331813 ops/sec; 3245.4 MB/s
```

```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10-operands-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :      24.325 micros/op 41109 ops/sec;  402.1 MB/s
readseq      :       1.470 micros/op 680272 ops/sec; 6653.7 MB/s
readseq      :       1.231 micros/op 812347 ops/sec; 7945.5 MB/s
readseq      :       1.091 micros/op 916590 ops/sec; 8965.1 MB/s
readseq      :       1.109 micros/op 901713 ops/sec; 8819.6 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      27.257 micros/op 36687 ops/sec;  358.8 MB/s
readseq      :       4.443 micros/op 225073 ops/sec; 2201.4 MB/s
readseq      :       5.830 micros/op 171526 ops/sec; 1677.7 MB/s
readseq      :       4.173 micros/op 239635 ops/sec; 2343.8 MB/s
readseq      :       4.150 micros/op 240963 ops/sec; 2356.8 MB/s
```

Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make check -j64

Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: lovro, andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57075
2016-07-20 09:49:03 -07:00
Baraa Hamodi 21e95811d1 Updated all copyright headers to the new format. 2016-02-09 15:12:00 -08:00
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang cda4006e87 Enhance partial merge to support multiple arguments
Summary:
* PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands.
* Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum
  number of operands to trigger partial merge.
* This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also
  includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for
  partial merge.

Test Plan:
* make check all
* develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two
  operands.

TODOs (from Schalk):
* Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2.
* Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably
  use results of task #2837810.)
* Add description of problem to doc/index.html.
* Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes.

Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815
2014-03-24 17:57:13 -07:00
Dhruba Borthakur a143ef9b38 Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.

Test Plan: compile rocksdb

Reviewers: emayanke

Reviewed By: emayanke

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
2013-10-04 11:59:26 -07:00
Dhruba Borthakur 1186192ed1 Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.

Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
2013-08-23 10:51:00 -07:00
Deon Nicholas e1346968d8 Merge operator fixes part 1.
Summary:
-Added null checks and revisions to DBIter::MergeValuesNewToOld()
-Added DBIter test to stringappend_test
-Major fix with Merge and TTL
More plans for fixes later.

Test Plan:
-make clean; make stringappend_test -j 32; ./stringappend_test
-make all check;

Reviewers: haobo, emayanke, vamsi, dhruba

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12315
2013-08-19 11:42:47 -07:00
Deon Nicholas c2d7826ced [RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences.
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.

I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.

This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.

NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!

Test Plan:
  -This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
  -I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
  -I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
  -I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
  -I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
  -A lot of feedback from the reviewers.

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
2013-08-05 20:14:32 -07:00
Haobo Xu 05e8854085 [Rocksdb] Support Merge operation in rocksdb
Summary:
This diff introduces a new Merge operation into rocksdb.
The purpose of this review is mostly getting feedback from the team (everyone please) on the design.

Please focus on the four files under include/leveldb/, as they spell the client visible interface change.
include/leveldb/db.h
include/leveldb/merge_operator.h
include/leveldb/options.h
include/leveldb/write_batch.h

Please go over local/my_test.cc carefully, as it is a concerete use case.

Please also review the impelmentation files to see if the straw man implementation makes sense.

Note that, the diff does pass all make check and truly supports forward iterator over db and a version
of Get that's based on iterator.

Future work:
- Integration with compaction
- A raw Get implementation

I am working on a wiki that explains the design and implementation choices, but coding comes
just naturally and I think it might be a good idea to share the code earlier. The code is
heavily commented.

Test Plan: run all local tests

Reviewers: dhruba, heyongqiang

Reviewed By: dhruba

CC: leveldb, zshao, sheki, emayanke, MarkCallaghan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9651
2013-05-03 16:59:02 -07:00