Summary:
Summary - Refactor FilePrefetchBuffer code
- Implementation:
FilePrefetchBuffer maintains a deque of free buffers (free_bufs_) of size num_buffers_ and buffers (bufs_) which contains the prefetched data. Whenever a buffer is consumed or is outdated (w.r.t. to requested offset), that buffer is cleared and returned to free_bufs_.
If a buffer is available in free_bufs_, it's moved to bufs_ and is sent for prefetching. num_buffers_ defines how many buffers are maintained that contains prefetched data.
If num_buffers_ == 1, it's a sequential read flow. Read API will be called on that one buffer whenever the data is requested and is not in the buffer.
If num_buffers_ > 1, then the data is prefetched asynchronosuly in the buffers whenever the data is consumed from the buffers and that buffer is freed.
If num_buffers > 1, then requested data can be overlapping between 2 buffers. To return the continuous buffer overlap_bufs_ is used. The requested data is copied from 2 buffers to the overlap_bufs_ and overlap_bufs_ is returned to
the caller.
- Merged Sync and Async code flow into one in FilePrefetchBuffer.
Test Plan -
- Crash test passed
- Unit tests
- Pending - Benchmarks
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/12097
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D51759552
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 69a352945affac2ed22be96048d55863e0168ad5
Summary:
Add support for tuning of readahead_size by block cache lookup for async_io.
**Design/ Implementation** -
**BlockBasedTableIterator.cc** -
`BlockCacheLookupForReadAheadSize` callback API lookups in the block cache and tries to reduce the start
and end offset passed. This function looks into the block cache for the blocks between `start_offset`
and `end_offset` and add all the handles in the queue.
It then iterates from the end in the handles to find first miss block and update the end offset to that block.
It also iterates from the start and find first miss block and update the start offset to that block.
```
_read_curr_block_ argument : True if this call was due to miss in the cache and caller wants to read that block
synchronously.
False if current call is to prefetch additional data in extra buffers
(due to ReadAsync call in FilePrefetchBuffer)
```
In case there is no data to be read in that callback (because of upper_bound or all blocks are in cache),
it updates start and end offset to be equal and that `FilePrefetchBuffer` interprets that as 0 length to be read.
**FilePrefetchBuffer.cc** -
FilePrefetchBuffer calls the callback - `ReadAheadSizeTuning` and pass the start and end offset to that
callback to get updated start and end offset to read based on cache hits/misses.
1. In case of Read calls (when offset passed to FilePrefetchBuffer is on cache miss and that data needs to be read), _read_curr_block_ is passed true.
2. In case of ReadAsync calls, when buffer is all consumed and can go for additional prefetching, the start offset passed is the initial end offset of prev buffer (without any updated offset based on cache hit/miss).
Foreg. if following are the data blocks with cache hit/miss and start offset
and Read API found miss on DB1 and based on readahead_size (50) it passes end offset to be 50.
[DB1 - miss- 0 ] [DB2 - hit -10] [DB3 - miss -20] [DB4 - miss-30] [DB5 - hit-40]
[DB6 - hit-50] [DB7 - miss-60] [DB8 - miss - 70] [DB9 - hit - 80] [DB6 - hit 90]
- For Read call - updated start offset remains 0 but end offset updates to DB4, as DB5 is in cache.
- Read calls saves initial end offset 50 as that was meant to be prefetched.
- Now for next ReadAsync call - the start offset will be 50 (previous buffer initial end offset) and based on readahead_size, end offset will be 100
- On callback, because of cache hits - callback will update the start offset to 60 and end offset to 80 to read only 2 data blocks (DB7 and DB8).
- And for that ReadAsync call - initial end offset will be set to 100 which will again used by next ReadAsync call as start offset.
- `initial_end_offset_` in `BufferInfo` is used to save the initial end offset of that buffer.
- If let's say DB5 and DB6 overlaps in 2 buffers (because of alignment), `prev_buf_end_offset` is passed to make sure already prefetched data is not prefetched again in second buffer.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11936
Test Plan:
- Ran crash_test several times.
- New unit tests added.
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D50906217
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 0d75d3c98274e98aa34901b201b8fb05232139cf
Summary:
Implement block cache lookup to determine readahead_size during scans. It's enabled if auto_readahead_size, block_cache and iterate_upper_bound - all three are set.
Design -
1. Whenever there is a cache miss and FilePrefetchBuffer is called, a callback is made to determine readahead_size for that prefetching.
2. The callback iterates over index and do block cache lookup for each data block handle until existing readahead_size is reached. Then It removes the cache hit data blocks from end to calculate optimized readahead_size.
3. Since index_iter_ is moved, it stores block handles in a queue, and use that queue to get block handle instead of doing index_iter_->Next().
4. This is for Sync scans. Async scans support is in progress.
NOTE:
The issue right now is after Seek and Next, if Prev is called, there is no way to do Prev operation. index_iter_ is already pointing to a different block. So it returns "Not supported" in that case with error message - "auto tuning of readahead size is not supported with Prev op"
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11860
Test Plan:
- Added new unit test
- crash_tests
- Running scans locally to check for any regression
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D49548118
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: f1aee409a71b4ad9e5bf3610f43edf30c6630c78
Summary:
Update the logic in FilePrefetchBuffer to update `upper_bound_offset_` during reseek. During Reseek, `iterate_upper_bound` can be changed dynamically. So added an API to update that in FilePrefetchBuffer.
Added unit test to confirm the behavior.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11775
Test Plan:
- Check stress tests in case there is any failure after this diff.
- make crash_test -j32 with auto_readahead_size=1 passed locally
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D48815177
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 5f44fbb3af06c86a1c38f139c5fa4543891837f4
Summary:
Implement trimming of readahead_size under a new option ReadOptions.auto_readahead_size. It'll trim the readahead_size during prefetching upto iterate_upper_bound offset only when ReadOptions.iterate_upper_bound is set, therefore reducing the prefetching of data beyond upper_bound.
It's enabled for both implicit auto readahead size and when ReadOptions.readahead_size is specified and for sync and async_io.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11684
Test Plan: Added new unit test
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D48479723
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 2b1703579caf779105e836b580866ffd7db076fc
Summary:
**Context/Summary:**
- Similar to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11288 but for user read such as `Get(), MultiGet(), DBIterator::XXX(), Verify(File)Checksum()`.
- For this, I refactored some user-facing `MultiGet` calls in `TransactionBase` and various types of `DB` so that it does not call a user-facing `Get()` but `GetImpl()` for passing the `ReadOptions::io_activity` check (see PR conversation)
- New user read stats breakdown are guarded by `kExceptDetailedTimers` since measurement shows they have 4-5% regression to the upstream/main.
- Misc
- More refactoring: with https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11288, we complete passing `ReadOptions/IOOptions` to FS level. So we can now replace the previously [added](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9424) `rate_limiter_priority` parameter in `RandomAccessFileReader`'s `Read/MultiRead/Prefetch()` with `IOOptions::rate_limiter_priority`
- Also, `ReadAsync()` call time is measured in `SST_READ_MICRO` now
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11444
Test Plan:
- CI fake db crash/stress test
- Microbenchmarking
**Build** `make clean && ROCKSDB_NO_FBCODE=1 DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make -jN db_basic_bench`
- google benchmark version: 604f6fd3f4
- db_basic_bench_base: upstream
- db_basic_bench_pr: db_basic_bench_base + this PR
- asyncread_db_basic_bench_base: upstream + [db basic bench patch for IteratorNext](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/compare/main...hx235:rocksdb:micro_bench_async_read)
- asyncread_db_basic_bench_pr: asyncread_db_basic_bench_base + this PR
**Test**
Get
```
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./db_basic_bench_{null_stat|base|pr} --benchmark_filter=DBGet/comp_style:0/max_data:134217728/per_key_size:256/enable_statistics:1/negative_query:0/enable_filter:0/mmap:1/threads:1 --benchmark_repetitions=1000
```
Result
```
Coming soon
```
AsyncRead
```
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm ./asyncread_db_basic_bench_{base|pr} --benchmark_filter=IteratorNext/comp_style:0/max_data:134217728/per_key_size:256/enable_statistics:1/async_io:1/include_detailed_timers:0 --benchmark_repetitions=1000 > syncread_db_basic_bench_{base|pr}.out
```
Result
```
Base:
1956,1956,1968,1977,1979,1986,1988,1988,1988,1990,1991,1991,1993,1993,1993,1993,1994,1996,1997,1997,1997,1998,1999,2001,2001,2002,2004,2007,2007,2008,
PR (2.3% regression, due to measuring `SST_READ_MICRO` that wasn't measured before):
1993,2014,2016,2022,2024,2027,2027,2028,2028,2030,2031,2031,2032,2032,2038,2039,2042,2044,2044,2047,2047,2047,2048,2049,2050,2052,2052,2052,2053,2053,
```
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D45918925
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 58a54560d9ebeb3a59b6d807639692614dad058a
Summary:
**Context/Summary**
As titled. The benefit of doing so is to explicitly call readahead() instead of relying page cache behavior for compaction read when we know that we most likely need readahead as compaction read is sequential read .
**Test**
Extended the existing UT to cover compaction read case
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11631
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D47681437
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 78792f64985c4dc44aa8f2a9c41ab3e8bbc0bc90
Summary:
This PR adds few optimizations for async_io for shorter scans.
1. If async_io is enabled, seek would create FilePrefetchBuffer object to fetch the data asynchronously. However `FilePrefetchbuffer::num_file_reads_` wasn't taken into consideration if it calls Next after Seek and would go for Prefetching. This PR fixes that and Next will go for prefetching only if `FilePrefetchbuffer::num_file_reads_` is greater than 2 along with if blocks are sequential. This scenario is only for implicit auto readahead.
2. For seek, when it calls TryReadFromCacheAsync to poll it makes async call as well because TryReadFromCacheAsync flow wasn't changed. So I updated to return after poll instead of further prefetching any data.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10140
Test Plan:
1. Added a unit test
2. Ran crash_test with async_io = 1 to make sure nothing crashes.
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D37042242
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: b8e6b7cb2ee0886f37a8f53951948b9084e8ffda
Summary:
### Context:
Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users.
### Solution
User, Flush, and Compaction reads share some code path. For this task, we update the rate_limiter_priority in ReadOptions for code paths (e.g. FindTable (mainly in BlockBasedTable::Open()) and various iterators), and eventually update the rate_limiter_priority in IOOptions for FSRandomAccessFile.
**This PR is for the Read path.** The **Read:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows:
| State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled |
| ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- |
| Flush (verification read in BuildTable()) | IO_USER | IO_USER | IO_USER |
| Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER |
| User | User provided | User provided | User provided |
We will respect the read_options that the user provided and will not set it.
The only sst read for Flush is the verification read in BuildTable(). It claims to be "regard as user read".
**Details**
1. Set read_options.rate_limiter_priority dynamically:
- User: Do not update the read_options. Use the read_options that the user provided.
- Compaction: Update read_options in CompactionJob::ProcessKeyValueCompaction().
- Flush: Update read_options in BuildTable().
2. Pass the rate limiter priority to FSRandomAccessFile functions:
- After calling the FindTable(), read_options is passed through GetTableReader(table_cache.cc), BlockBasedTableFactory::NewTableReader(block_based_table_factory.cc), and BlockBasedTable::Open(). The Open() needs some updates for the ReadOptions variable and the updates are also needed for the called functions, including PrefetchTail(), PrepareIOOptions(), ReadFooterFromFile(), ReadMetaIndexblock(), ReadPropertiesBlock(), PrefetchIndexAndFilterBlocks(), and ReadRangeDelBlock().
- In RandomAccessFileReader, the functions to be updated include Read(), MultiRead(), ReadAsync(), and Prefetch().
- Update the downstream functions of NewIndexIterator(), NewDataBlockIterator(), and BlockBasedTableIterator().
### Test Plans
Add unit tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9996
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D36452483
Pulled By: gitbw95
fbshipit-source-id: 60978204a4f849bb9261cb78d9bc1cb56d6008cf
Summary:
In FilePrefetchBuffer if reads are sequential, after prefetching call ReadAsync API to prefetch data asynchronously so that in next prefetching data will be available. Data prefetched asynchronously will be readahead_size/2. It uses two buffers, one for synchronous prefetching and one for asynchronous. In case, the data is overlapping, the data is copied from both buffers to third buffer to make it continuous.
This feature is under ReadOptions::async_io and is under experimental.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9674
Test Plan:
1. Add new unit tests
2. Run **db_stress** to make sure nothing crashes.
- Normal prefetch without `async_io` ran successfully:
```
export CRASH_TEST_EXT_ARGS=" --async_io=0"
make crash_test -j
```
3. **Run Regressions**.
i) Main branch without any change for normal prefetching with async_io disabled:
```
./db_bench -db=/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_main -benchmarks="fillseq" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -
use_direct_io_for_flush_and_compaction=true -target_file_size_base=16777216
```
```
./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_main -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1
Initializing RocksDB Options from the specified file
Initializing RocksDB Options from command-line flags
RocksDB: version 7.0
Date: Thu Mar 17 13:11:34 2022
CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Broadwell)
CPUCache: 16384 KB
Keys: 32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp)
Values: 512 bytes each (256 bytes after compression)
Entries: 5000000
Prefix: 0 bytes
Keys per prefix: 0
RawSize: 2594.0 MB (estimated)
FileSize: 1373.3 MB (estimated)
Write rate: 0 bytes/second
Read rate: 0 ops/second
Compression: Snappy
Compression sampling rate: 0
Memtablerep: SkipListFactory
Perf Level: 1
------------------------------------------------
DB path: [/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_main]
seekrandom : 483618.390 micros/op 2 ops/sec; 338.9 MB/s (249 of 249 found)
```
ii) normal prefetching after changes with async_io disable:
```
./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_withchange -benchmarks="seekrandom" -key_size=32 -value_size=512 -num=5000000 -use_direct_reads=true -seek_nexts=327680 -duration=120 -ops_between_duration_checks=1
Initializing RocksDB Options from the specified file
Initializing RocksDB Options from command-line flags
RocksDB: version 7.0
Date: Thu Mar 17 14:11:31 2022
CPU: 24 * Intel Core Processor (Broadwell)
CPUCache: 16384 KB
Keys: 32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp)
Values: 512 bytes each (256 bytes after compression)
Entries: 5000000
Prefix: 0 bytes
Keys per prefix: 0
RawSize: 2594.0 MB (estimated)
FileSize: 1373.3 MB (estimated)
Write rate: 0 bytes/second
Read rate: 0 ops/second
Compression: Snappy
Compression sampling rate: 0
Memtablerep: SkipListFactory
Perf Level: 1
------------------------------------------------
DB path: [/tmp/prefix_scan_prefetch_withchange]
seekrandom : 471347.227 micros/op 2 ops/sec; 348.1 MB/s (255 of 255 found)
```
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D34731543
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 8e23aa93453d5fe3c672b9231ad582f60207937f
Summary:
RocksDB does auto-readahead for iterators on noticing more than two sequential reads for a table file if user doesn't provide readahead_size. The readahead starts at 8KB and doubles on every additional read up to max_auto_readahead_size. However at each level, if iterator moves over next file, readahead_size starts again from 8KB.
This PR introduces a new ReadOption "adaptive_readahead" which when set true will maintain readahead_size at each level. So when iterator moves from one file to another, new file's readahead_size will continue from previous file's readahead_size instead of scratch. However if reads are not sequential it will fall back to 8KB (default) with no prefetching for that block.
1. If block is found in cache but it was eligible for prefetch (block wasn't in Rocksdb's prefetch buffer), readahead_size will decrease by 8KB.
2. It maintains readahead_size for L1 - Ln levels.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9056
Test Plan:
Added new unit tests
Ran db_bench for "readseq, seekrandom, seekrandomwhilewriting, readrandom" with --adaptive_readahead=true and there was no regression if new feature is enabled.
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D31773640
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 7332d16258b846ae5cea773009195a5af58f8f98
Summary:
BlockPrefetcher is used by iterators to prefetch data if they
anticipate more data to be used in future and this is valid for forward sequential
scans. But BlockPrefetcher tracks only num_file_reads_ and not if reads
are sequential. This presents problem for MultiGet with large number of
keys when it reseeks index iterator and data block. FilePrefetchBuffer
can end up doing large readahead for reseeks as readahead size
increases exponentially once readahead is enabled. Same issue is with
BlockBasedTableIterator.
Add previous length and offset read as well in BlockPrefetcher (creates
FilePrefetchBuffer) and FilePrefetchBuffer (does prefetching of data) to
determine if reads are sequential and then prefetch.
Update the last block read after cache hit to take reads from cache also
in account.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7394
Test Plan: Add new unit test case
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D23737617
Pulled By: akankshamahajan15
fbshipit-source-id: 8e6917c25ed87b285ee495d1b68dc623d71205a3
Summary:
Right now block based table iterator is used as both of iterating data for block based table, and for the index iterator for partitioend index. This was initially convenient for introducing a new iterator and block type for new index format, while reducing code change. However, these two usage doesn't go with each other very well. For example, Prev() is never called for partitioned index iterator, and some other complexity is maintained in block based iterators, which is not needed for index iterator but maintainers will always need to reason about it. Furthermore, the template usage is not following Google C++ Style which we are following, and makes a large chunk of code tangled together. This commit separate the two iterators. Right now, here is what it is done:
1. Copy the block based iterator code into partitioned index iterator, and de-template them.
2. Remove some code not needed for partitioned index. The upper bound check and tricks are removed. We never tested performance for those tricks when partitioned index is enabled in the first place. It's unlikelyl to generate performance regression, as creating new partitioned index block is much rarer than data blocks.
3. Separate out the prefetch logic to a helper class and both classes call them.
This commit will enable future follow-ups. One direction is that we might separate index iterator interface for data blocks and index blocks, as they are quite different.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6531
Test Plan: build using make and cmake. And build release
Differential Revision: D20473108
fbshipit-source-id: e48011783b339a4257c204cc07507b171b834b0f
