Summary:
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9984 changes the behavior of RocksDB: if logger creation failed during `SanitizeOptions()`,
`DB::Open()` will fail. However, since `SanitizeOptions()` is called in `DBImpl::DBImpl()`, we cannot
directly expose the error to caller without some additional work.
This is a first version proposal which:
- Adds a new member `init_logger_creation_s` to `DBImpl` to store the result of init logger creation
- Checks the error during `DB::Open()` and return it to caller if non-ok
This is not very ideal. We can alternatively move the logger creation logic out of the `SanitizeOptions()`.
Since `SanitizeOptions()` is used in other places, we need to check whether this change breaks anything
in case other callers of `SanitizeOptions()` assumes that a logger should be created.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10223
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D37321717
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 58042358a86369d606549dd9938933dd47591c4b
Summary:
For regular db instance and secondary instance, we return error and refuse to open DB if Logger creation fails.
Our current code allows it, but it is really difficult to debug because
there will be no LOG files. The same for OPTIONS file, which will be explored in another PR.
Furthermore, Arena::AllocateAligned(size_t bytes, size_t huge_page_size, Logger* logger) has an
assertion as the following:
```cpp
#ifdef MAP_HUGETLB
if (huge_page_size > 0 && bytes > 0) {
assert(logger != nullptr);
}
#endif
```
It can be removed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9984
Test Plan: make check
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D36347754
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 529798c0511d2eaa2f0fd40cf7e61c4cbc6bc57e
Summary:
**Context:**
`BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting` and `BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup` involve creating backup and restoring of a big database with rate-limiting. Using the normal env with a normal clock requires real elapse of time (13702 - 19848 ms/per test). As suggested in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8722#discussion_r703698603, this PR is to speed it up with SpecialEnv (`time_elapse_only_sleep=true`) where its clock accepts fake elapse of time during rate-limiting (100 - 600 ms/per test)
**Summary:**
- Added TEST_ function to set clock of the default rate limiters in backup engine
- Shrunk testdb by 10 times while keeping it big enough for testing
- Renamed some test variables and reorganized some if-else branch for clarity without changing the test
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9974
Test Plan:
- Run tests pre/post PR the same time to verify the tests are sped up by 90 - 95%
`BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting`
Pre:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 (11123 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 (9441 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 (11096 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 (9339 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 (11121 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 (9413 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 (11185 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 (9511 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (82230 ms total)
```
Post:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/0 (395 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/1 (564 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/2 (358 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/3 (567 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/4 (173 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/5 (176 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/6 (191 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimiting/7 (177 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (2601 ms total)
```
`BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup`
Pre:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 (7275 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 (3961 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 (7117 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 (3921 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 (19862 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 (10231 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 (19848 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 (10372 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (82587 ms total)
```
Post:
```
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/0 (157 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/1 (152 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/2 (160 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/3 (158 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/4 (155 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/5 (151 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/6 (146 ms)
[ RUN ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7
[ OK ] RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam.RateLimitingVerifyBackup/7 (153 ms)
[----------] 8 tests from RateLimiting/BackupEngineRateLimitingTestWithParam (1232 ms total)
```
Reviewed By: pdillinger
Differential Revision: D36336345
Pulled By: hx235
fbshipit-source-id: 724c6ba745f95f56d4440a6d2f1e4512a2987589
Summary:
ToString() is created as some platform doesn't support std::to_string(). However, we've already used std::to_string() by mistake for 16 months (in db/db_info_dumper.cc). This commit just remove ToString().
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9955
Test Plan: Watch CI tests
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D36176799
fbshipit-source-id: bdb6dcd0e3a3ab96a1ac810f5d0188f684064471
Summary:
Right now we still don't fully use std::numeric_limits but use a macro, mainly for supporting VS 2013. Right now we only support VS 2017 and up so it is not a problem. The code comment claims that MinGW still needs it. We don't have a CI running MinGW so it's hard to validate. since we now require C++17, it's hard to imagine MinGW would still build RocksDB but doesn't support std::numeric_limits<>.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9954
Test Plan: See CI Runs.
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D36173954
fbshipit-source-id: a35a73af17cdcae20e258cdef57fcf29a50b49e0
Summary:
Various renaming and fixes to get rid of remaining uses of
"backupable" which is terminology leftover from the original, flawed
design of BackupableDB. Now any DB can be backed up, using BackupEngine.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9792
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D35334386
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 2108a42b4575c8cccdfd791c549aae93ec2f3329
2022-04-05 09:52:33 -07:00
Renamed from utilities/backupable/backupable_db_test.cc (Browse further)
