When we recycle log files, we need to mix the log number into the CRC
for each record. Note that for logs that don't get recycled (like the
manifest), we always pass a log_number of 0 and false.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Summary:
Skipping these tests in ROCKSDB_LITE since they are not supported
json_document_test
wal_manager_test
ttl_test
sst_dump_test
deletefile_test
compact_files_test
prefix_test
checkpoint_test
Test Plan:
json_document_test
wal_manager_test
ttl_test
sst_dump_test
deletefile_test
compact_files_test
prefix_test
checkpoint_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42573
Summary: We want to keep Env a think layer for better portability. Less platform dependent codes should be moved out of Env. In this patch, I create a wrapper of file readers and writers, and put rate limiting, write buffering, as well as most perf context instrumentation and random kill out of Env. It will make it easier to maintain multiple Env in the future.
Test Plan: Run all existing unit tests.
Reviewers: anthony, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42321
Summary: We should use mocked-out env for these tests to make it more realiable. Added benefit is that instead of actually sleeping for 3 seconds, we can instead pretend to sleep and just increase time counters.
Test Plan: for i in `seq 100`; do ./wal_manager_test --gtest_filter=WalManagerTest.WALArchivalTtl ;done
Reviewers: rven, meyering
Reviewed By: meyering
Subscribers: meyering, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D36951
Summary: It is no longer used by the implementation, so we should also remove it from the public API.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34971
Summary:
Our existing test notation is very similar to what is used in gtest. It makes it easy to adopt what is different.
In this diff I modify existing [[ https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/Primer#Test_Fixtures:_Using_the_Same_Data_Configuration_for_Multiple_Te | test fixture ]] classes to inherit from `testing::Test`. Also for unit tests that use fixture class, `TEST` is replaced with `TEST_F` as required in gtest.
There are several custom `main` functions in our existing tests. To make this transition easier, I modify all `main` functions to fallow gtest notation. But eventually we can remove them and use implementation of `main` that gtest provides.
```lang=bash
% cat ~/transform
#!/bin/sh
files=$(git ls-files '*test\.cc')
for file in $files
do
if grep -q "rocksdb::test::RunAllTests()" $file
then
if grep -Eq '^class \w+Test {' $file
then
perl -pi -e 's/^(class \w+Test) {/${1}: public testing::Test {/g' $file
perl -pi -e 's/^(TEST)/${1}_F/g' $file
fi
perl -pi -e 's/(int main.*\{)/${1}::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);/g' $file
perl -pi -e 's/rocksdb::test::RunAllTests/RUN_ALL_TESTS/g' $file
fi
done
% sh ~/transform
% make format
```
Second iteration of this diff contains only scripted changes.
Third iteration contains manual changes to fix last errors and make it compilable.
Test Plan:
Build and notice no errors.
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make check -j55
```
Tests are still testing.
Reviewers: meyering, sdong, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35157
Summary:
gtest does not use exceptions to fail a unit test by design, and `ASSERT*`s are implemented using `return`. As a consequence we cannot use `ASSERT*` in a function that does not return `void` value ([[ https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Assertion_Placement | 1]]), and have to fix our existing code. This diff does this in a generic way, with no manual changes.
In order to detect all existing `ASSERT*` that are used in functions that doesn't return void value, I change the code to generate compile errors for such cases.
In `util/testharness.h` I defined `EXPECT*` assertions, the same way as `ASSERT*`, and redefined `ASSERT*` to return `void`. Then executed:
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make all -j55 -k 2> build.log
% perl -naF: -e 'print "-- -number=".$F[1]." ".$F[0]."\n" if /: error:/' \
build.log | xargs -L 1 perl -spi -e 's/ASSERT/EXPECT/g if $. == $number'
% make format
```
After that I reverted back change to `ASSERT*` in `util/testharness.h`. But preserved introduced `EXPECT*`, which is the same as `ASSERT*`. This will be deleted once switched to gtest.
This diff is independent and contains manual changes only in `util/testharness.h`.
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make check
```
Reviewers: igor, lgalanis, sdong, yufei.zhu, rven, meyering
Reviewed By: meyering
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33333
Summary:
Introduces a new class for managing write buffer memory across column
families. We supplement ColumnFamilyOptions::write_buffer_size with
ColumnFamilyOptions::write_buffer, a shared pointer to a WriteBuffer
instance that enforces memory limits before flushing out to disk.
Test Plan: Added SharedWriteBuffer unit test to db_test.cc
Reviewers: sdong, rven, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: tnovak, yhchiang, dhruba, xjin, MarkCallaghan, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22581
Summary:
In some environment such as android, the c++ library does not have
std::to_string. This path adds rocksdb::ToString(), which wraps std::to_string
when std::to_string is not available, and implements std::to_string
in the other case.
Test Plan:
make dbg -j32
./db_test
make clean
make dbg OPT=-DOS_ANDROID -j32
./db_test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29181
Summary: Decoupling code that deals with archived log files outside of DBImpl. That will make this code easier to reason about and test. It will also make the code easier to improve, because an improver doesn't have to understand DBImpl code in entirety.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D27873
Baraa Hamodi