Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Dillinger e466173d5c Print stack traces on frozen tests in CI (#10828)
Summary:
Instead of existing calls to ps from gnu_parallel, call a new wrapper that does ps, looks for unit test like processes, and uses pstack or gdb to print thread stack traces. Also, using `ps -wwf` instead of `ps -wf` ensures output is not cut off.

For security, CircleCI runs with security restrictions on ptrace (/proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope = 1), and this change adds a work-around to `InstallStackTraceHandler()` (only used by testing tools) to allow any process from the same user to debug it. (I've also touched >100 files to ensure all the unit tests call this function.)

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10828

Test Plan: local manual + temporary infinite loop in a unit test to observe in CircleCI

Reviewed By: hx235

Differential Revision: D40447634

Pulled By: pdillinger

fbshipit-source-id: 718a4c4a5b54fa0f9af2d01a446162b45e5e84e1
2022-10-18 00:35:35 -07:00
Gang Liao 275cd80cdb Add a blob-specific cache priority (#10461)
Summary:
RocksDB's `Cache` abstraction currently supports two priority levels for items: high (used for frequently accessed/highly valuable SST metablocks like index/filter blocks) and low (used for SST data blocks). Blobs are typically lower-value targets for caching than data blocks, since 1) with BlobDB, data blocks containing blob references conceptually form an index structure which has to be consulted before we can read the blob value, and 2) cached blobs represent only a single key-value, while cached data blocks generally contain multiple KVs. Since we would like to make it possible to use the same backing cache for the block cache and the blob cache, it would make sense to add a new, lower-than-low cache priority level (bottom level) for blobs so data blocks are prioritized over them.

This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10461

Reviewed By: siying

Differential Revision: D38672823

Pulled By: ltamasi

fbshipit-source-id: 90cf7362036563d79891f47be2cc24b827482743
2022-08-12 17:59:06 -07:00
Peter Dillinger 65036e4217 Revert "Add a blob-specific cache priority (#10309)" (#10434)
Summary:
This reverts commit 8d178090be
because of a clear performance regression seen in internal dashboard
https://fburl.com/unidash/tpz75iee

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10434

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D38256373

Pulled By: pdillinger

fbshipit-source-id: 134aa00f50dd7b1bbe037c227884a351342ec44b
2022-07-29 07:18:15 -07:00
Gang Liao 8d178090be Add a blob-specific cache priority (#10309)
Summary:
RocksDB's `Cache` abstraction currently supports two priority levels for items: high (used for frequently accessed/highly valuable SST metablocks like index/filter blocks) and low (used for SST data blocks). Blobs are typically lower-value targets for caching than data blocks, since 1) with BlobDB, data blocks containing blob references conceptually form an index structure which has to be consulted before we can read the blob value, and 2) cached blobs represent only a single key-value, while cached data blocks generally contain multiple KVs. Since we would like to make it possible to use the same backing cache for the block cache and the blob cache, it would make sense to add a new, lower-than-low cache priority level (bottom level) for blobs so data blocks are prioritized over them.

This task is a part of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10156

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10309

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D38211655

Pulled By: gangliao

fbshipit-source-id: 65ef33337db4d85277cc6f9782d67c421ad71dd5
2022-07-27 19:09:24 -07:00
mrambacher fe9d495112 Return different Status based on ObjectRegistry::NewObject calls (#9333)
Summary:
This fix addresses https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9299.

If attempting to create a new object via the ObjectRegistry and a factory is not found, the ObjectRegistry will return a "NotSupported" status.  This is the same behavior as previously.

If the factory is found but could not successfully create the object, an "InvalidArgument" status is returned.  If the factory returned a reason why (in the errmsg), this message will be in the returned status.

In practice, there are two options in the ConfigOptions that control how these errors are propagated:
- If "ignore_unknown_options=true", then both InvalidArgument and NotSupported status codes will be swallowed internally.  Both cases will return success
- If "ignore_unsupported_options=true", then having no factory will return success but a failing factory will return an error
- If both options are false, both cases (no and failing factory) will return errors.

In practice this likely only changes Customizable that may be partially available.  For example, the JEMallocMemoryAllocator is a built-in allocator that is registered with the system but may not be compiled in.  In this case, the status code for this allocator changed from NotSupported("JEMalloc not available") to InvalidArgumen("JEMalloc not available").  Other Customizable builtins/plugins would have the same semantics.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9333

Reviewed By: pdillinger

Differential Revision: D33517681

Pulled By: mrambacher

fbshipit-source-id: 8033052d4a4a7b88c2d9f90147b1b4467e51f6fd
2022-02-11 05:11:24 -08:00
mrambacher 0a563ae278 Change GTEST_SKIP to BYPASS for MemoryAllocatorTest (#9340)
Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9340

Reviewed By: riversand963

Differential Revision: D33344152

Pulled By: mrambacher

fbshipit-source-id: 283637625b86c33497571c5f52cac3ddf910b6f3
2021-12-29 03:41:39 -08:00
Andrew Kryczka 48b53441fd Skip MemoryAllocatorTest in LITE mode (#9318)
Summary:
The tests rely on `CreateFromString()`, which returns
`Status::NotSupported()` when these tests attempt to create non-default
allocators.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9318

Reviewed By: riversand963

Differential Revision: D33238405

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: d2974e2341f1494f5f7cd07b73f2dbd0d502fc7c
2021-12-20 10:28:29 -08:00
mrambacher 423538a816 Make MemoryAllocator into a Customizable class (#8980)
Summary:
- Make MemoryAllocator and its implementations into a Customizable class.
- Added a "DefaultMemoryAllocator" which uses new and delete
- Added a "CountedMemoryAllocator" that counts the number of allocs and free
- Updated the existing tests to use these new allocators
- Changed the memkind allocator test into a generic test that can test the various allocators.
- Added tests for creating all of the allocators
- Added tests to verify/create the JemallocNodumpAllocator using its options.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8980

Reviewed By: zhichao-cao

Differential Revision: D32990403

Pulled By: mrambacher

fbshipit-source-id: 6fdfe8218c10dd8dfef34344a08201be1fa95c76
2021-12-17 04:20:47 -08:00