Summary:
FragmentedRangeTombstoneList has a member variable `seq_set_` that contains the sequence numbers of all range tombstones in a set. The set is constructed in `FragmentTombstones()` and is used only in `FragmentedRangeTombstoneList::ContainsRange()` which only happens during compaction. This PR moves the initialization of `seq_set_` to `FragmentedRangeTombstoneList::ContainsRange()`. This should speed up `FragmentTombstones()` when the range tombstone list is used for read/scan requests. Microbench shows the speed improvement to be ~45%.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10848
Test Plan:
- Existing tests and stress test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py whitebox --simple --verify_iterator_with_expected_state_one_in=5`.
- Microbench: update `range_del_aggregator_bench` to benchmark speed of `FragmentTombstones()`:
```
./range_del_aggregator_bench --num_range_tombstones=1000 --tombstone_start_upper_bound=50000000 --num_runs=10000 --tombstone_width_mean=200 --should_deletes_per_run=100 --use_compaction_range_del_aggregator=true
Before this PR:
=========================
Fragment Tombstones: 270.286 us
AddTombstones: 1.28933 us
ShouldDelete (first): 0.525528 us
ShouldDelete (rest): 0.0797519 us
After this PR: time to fragment tombstones is pushed to AddTombstones() which only happen during compaction.
=========================
Fragment Tombstones: 149.879 us
AddTombstones: 102.131 us
ShouldDelete (first): 0.565871 us
ShouldDelete (rest): 0.0729444 us
```
- db_bench: this should improve speed for fragmenting range tombstones for mutable memtable:
```
./db_bench --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --writes_per_range_tombstone=100 --max_write_buffer_number=100 --min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 --writes=500000 --reads=250000 --disable_auto_compactions --max_num_range_tombstones=100000 --finish_after_writes --write_buffer_size=1073741824 --threads=25
Before this PR:
readwhilewriting : 18.301 micros/op 1310445 ops/sec 4.769 seconds 6250000 operations; 28.1 MB/s (41001 of 250000 found)
After this PR:
readwhilewriting : 16.943 micros/op 1439376 ops/sec 4.342 seconds 6250000 operations; 23.8 MB/s (28977 of 250000 found)
```
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D40646227
Pulled By: cbi42
fbshipit-source-id: ea471667edb258f67d01cfd828588e80a89e4083
Summary:
Add user-defined timestamp support for range deletion. The new API is `DeleteRange(opt, cf, begin_key, end_key, ts)`. Most of the change is to update the comparator to compare without timestamp. Other than that, major changes are
- internal range tombstone data structures (`FragmentedRangeTombstoneList`, `RangeTombstone`, etc.) to store timestamps.
- Garbage collection of range tombstones and range tombstone covered keys during compaction.
- Get()/MultiGet() to return the timestamp of a range tombstone when needed.
- Get/Iterator with range tombstones bounded by readoptions.timestamp.
- timestamp crash test now issues DeleteRange by default.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10661
Test Plan:
- Added unit test: `make check`
- Stress test: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py --enable_ts whitebox --readpercent=57 --prefixpercent=4 --writepercent=25 -delpercent=5 --iterpercent=5 --delrangepercent=4`
- Ran `db_bench` to measure regression when timestamp is not enabled. The tests are for write (with some range deletion) and iterate with DB fitting in memory: `./db_bench--benchmarks=fillrandom,seekrandom --writes_per_range_tombstone=200 --max_write_buffer_number=100 --min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 --writes=500000 --reads=500000 --seek_nexts=10 --disable_auto_compactions -disable_wal=true --max_num_range_tombstones=1000`. Did not see consistent regression in no timestamp case.
| micros/op | fillrandom | seekrandom |
| --- | --- | --- |
|main| 2.58 |10.96|
|PR 10661| 2.68 |10.63|
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D39441192
Pulled By: cbi42
fbshipit-source-id: f05aca3c41605caf110daf0ff405919f300ddec2
Summary:
Each read from memtable used to read and fragment all the range tombstones into a `FragmentedRangeTombstoneList`. https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10380 improved the inefficient here by caching a `FragmentedRangeTombstoneList` with each immutable memtable. This PR extends the caching to mutable memtables. The fragmented range tombstone can be constructed in either read (This PR) or write path (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10584). With both implementation, each `DeleteRange()` will invalidate the cache, and the difference is where the cache is re-constructed.`CoreLocalArray` is used to store the cache with each memtable so that multi-threaded reads can be efficient. More specifically, each core will have a shared_ptr to a shared_ptr pointing to the current cache. Each read thread will only update the reference count in its core-local shared_ptr, and this is only needed when reading from mutable memtables.
The choice between write path and read path is not an easy one: they are both improvement compared to no caching in the current implementation, but they favor different operations and could cause regression in the other operation (read vs write). The write path caching in (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10584) leads to a cleaner implementation, but I chose the read path caching here to avoid significant regression in write performance when there is a considerable amount of range tombstones in a single memtable (the number from the benchmark below suggests >1000 with concurrent writers). Note that even though the fragmented range tombstone list is only constructed in `DeleteRange()` operations, it could block other writes from proceeding, and hence affects overall write performance.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10547
Test Plan:
- TestGet() in stress test is updated in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10553 to compare Get() result against expected state: `./db_stress_branch --readpercent=57 --prefixpercent=4 --writepercent=25 -delpercent=5 --iterpercent=5 --delrangepercent=4`
- Perf benchmark: tested read and write performance where a memtable has 0, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 range tombstones.
```
./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom,readrandom --writes_per_range_tombstone=200 --max_write_buffer_number=100 --min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 --writes=200000 --reads=100000 --disable_auto_compactions --max_num_range_tombstones=1000
```
Write perf regressed since the cost of constructing fragmented range tombstone list is shifted from every read to a single write. 6cbe5d8e172dc5f1ef65c9d0a6eedbd9987b2c72 is included in the last column as a reference to see performance impact on multi-thread reads if `CoreLocalArray` is not used.
micros/op averaged over 5 runs: first 4 columns are for fillrandom, last 4 columns are for readrandom.
| |fillrandom main | write path caching | read path caching |memtable V3 (https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10308) | readrandom main | write path caching | read path caching |memtable V3 |
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 |6.35 |6.15 |5.82 |6.12 |2.24 |2.26 |2.03 |2.07 |
| 1 |5.99 |5.88 |5.77 |6.28 |2.65 |2.27 |2.24 |2.5 |
| 10 |6.15 |6.02 |5.92 |5.95 |5.15 |2.61 |2.31 |2.53 |
| 100 |5.95 |5.78 |5.88 |6.23 |28.31 |2.34 |2.45 |2.94 |
| 100 25 threads |52.01 |45.85 |46.18 |47.52 |35.97 |3.34 |3.34 |3.56 |
| 1000 |6.0 |7.07 |5.98 |6.08 |333.18 |2.86 |2.7 |3.6 |
| 1000 25 threads |52.6 |148.86 |79.06 |45.52 |473.49 |3.66 |3.48 |4.38 |
- Benchmark performance of`readwhilewriting` from https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/10552, 100 range tombstones are written: `./db_bench --benchmarks=readwhilewriting --writes_per_range_tombstone=500 --max_write_buffer_number=100 --min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=100 --writes=100000 --reads=500000 --disable_auto_compactions --max_num_range_tombstones=10000 --finish_after_writes`
readrandom micros/op:
| |main |write path caching |read path caching |memtable V3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| single thread |48.28 |1.55 |1.52 |1.96 |
| 25 threads |64.3 |2.55 |2.67 |2.64 |
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D38895410
Pulled By: cbi42
fbshipit-source-id: 930bfc309dd1b2f4e8e9042f5126785bba577559
Summary:
**Summary**:
2 new statistics counters are added to RocksDB: `MEMTABLE_PAYLOAD_BYTES_AT_FLUSH` and `MEMTABLE_GARBAGE_BYTES_AT_FLUSH`. The former tracks how many raw bytes of useful data are present on the memtable at flush time, whereas the latter is tracks how many of these raw bytes are considered garbage, meaning that they ended up not being imported on the SSTables resulting from the flush operations.
**Unit test**: run `make db_flush_test -j$(nproc); ./db_flush_test` to run the unit test.
This executable includes 3 tests, that test support and correct stat calculations for workloads with inserts, deletes, and DeleteRanges. The parameters are set such that the workloads are performed on a single memtable, and a single SSTable is created as a result of the flush operation. The flush operation is manually called in the test file. The tests verify that the values of these 2 statistics counters introduced in this PR can be exactly predicted, showing that we have a full understanding of the underlying operations.
**Performance testing**:
`./db_bench -statistics -benchmarks=fillrandom -num=10000000` repeated 10 times.
Timing done using "date" function in a bash script.
_Results_:
Original Rocksdb fork: mean 66.6 sec, std 1.18 sec.
This feature branch: mean 67.4 sec, std 1.35 sec.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8411
Reviewed By: akankshamahajan15
Differential Revision: D29150629
Pulled By: bjlemaire
fbshipit-source-id: 7b3c2e86d50c6aa34fa50fd134282eacb543a5b1
Summary:
When a memtable is flushed, it will validate number of entries it reads, and compare the number with how many entries inserted into memtable. This serves as one sanity c\
heck against memory corruption. This change will also allow more counters to be added in the future for better validation.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8288
Test Plan: Pass all existing tests
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D28369194
fbshipit-source-id: 7ff870380c41eab7f99eee508550dcdce32838ad
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
These uninitialized member variables can cause a key to not be pinned when it should be, causing erroneous behavior. For example ingesting a file with range deletion tombstones will yield an "external file have corrupted keys" on a Mac.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5720
Differential Revision: D17217673
fbshipit-source-id: cd7df7ce3ad9cf69c841c4d3dc6fd144eff9e212
Summary:
RangeDelAggregatorV2 now supports ShouldDelete calls on
snapshot stripes and creation of range tombstone compaction iterators.
RangeDelAggregator is no longer used on any non-test code path, and will
be removed in a future commit.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4758
Differential Revision: D13439254
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: fe105bcf8e3d4a2df37a622d5510843cd71b0401
Summary:
To support the flush/compaction use cases of RangeDelAggregator
in v2, FragmentedRangeTombstoneIterator now supports dropping tombstones
that cannot be read in the compaction output file. Furthermore,
FragmentedRangeTombstoneIterator supports the "snapshot striping" use
case by allowing an iterator to be split by a list of snapshots.
RangeDelAggregatorV2 will use these changes in a follow-up change.
In the process of making these changes, other miscellaneous cleanups
were also done in these files.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4740
Differential Revision: D13287382
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: f5aeb03e1b3058049b80c02a558ee48f723fa48c
Summary:
Removed `one_time_use` flag, which removed the need for some
tests, and changed all `NewRangeTombstoneIterator` methods to return
`FragmentedRangeTombstoneIterators`.
These changes also led to removing `RangeDelAggregatorV2::AddUnfragmentedTombstones`
and one of the `MemTableListVersion::AddRangeTombstoneIterators` methods.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4692
Differential Revision: D13106570
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: cbab5432d7fc2d9cdfd8d9d40361a1bffaa8f845
Summary:
The old RangeDelAggregator did expensive pre-processing work
to create a collapsed, binary-searchable representation of range
tombstones. With FragmentedRangeTombstoneIterator, much of this work is
now unnecessary. RangeDelAggregatorV2 takes advantage of this by seeking
in each iterator to find a covering tombstone in ShouldDelete, while
doing minimal work in AddTombstones. The old RangeDelAggregator is still
used during flush/compaction for now, though RangeDelAggregatorV2 will
support those uses in a future PR.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4649
Differential Revision: D13146964
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: be29a4c020fc440500c137216fcc1cf529571eb3
Summary:
Rather than storing a `vector<RangeTombstone>`, we now store a
`vector<RangeTombstoneStack>` and a `vector<SequenceNumber>`. A
`RangeTombstoneStack` contains the start and end keys of a range tombstone
fragment, and indices into the seqnum vector to indicate which sequence
numbers the fragment is located at. The diagram below illustrates an
example:
```
tombstones_: [a, b) [c, e) [h, k)
| \ / \ / |
| \ / \ / |
v v v v
tombstone_seqs_: [ 5 3 10 7 2 8 6 ]
```
This format allows binary searching the tombstone list to use less key
comparisons, which helps in cases where there are many overlapping
tombstones. Also, this format makes it easier to add DBIter-like
semantics to `FragmentedRangeTombstoneIterator` in the future.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4632
Differential Revision: D13053103
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: e8220cc712fcf5be4d602913bb23ace8ea5f8ef0
Summary:
This allows tombstone fragmenting to only be performed when the table is opened, and cached for subsequent accesses.
On the same DB used in #4449, running `readrandom` results in the following:
```
readrandom : 0.983 micros/op 1017076 ops/sec; 78.3 MB/s (63103 of 100000 found)
```
Now that Get performance in the presence of range tombstones is reasonable, I also compared the performance between a DB with range tombstones, "expanded" range tombstones (several point tombstones that cover the same keys the equivalent range tombstone would cover, a common workaround for DeleteRange), and no range tombstones. The created DBs had 5 million keys each, and DeleteRange was called at regular intervals (depending on the total number of range tombstones being written) after 4.5 million Puts. The table below summarizes the results of a `readwhilewriting` benchmark (in order to provide somewhat more realistic results):
```
Tombstones? | avg micros/op | stddev micros/op | avg ops/s | stddev ops/s
----------------- | ------------- | ---------------- | ------------ | ------------
None | 0.6186 | 0.04637 | 1,625,252.90 | 124,679.41
500 Expanded | 0.6019 | 0.03628 | 1,666,670.40 | 101,142.65
500 Unexpanded | 0.6435 | 0.03994 | 1,559,979.40 | 104,090.52
1k Expanded | 0.6034 | 0.04349 | 1,665,128.10 | 125,144.57
1k Unexpanded | 0.6261 | 0.03093 | 1,600,457.50 | 79,024.94
5k Expanded | 0.6163 | 0.05926 | 1,636,668.80 | 154,888.85
5k Unexpanded | 0.6402 | 0.04002 | 1,567,804.70 | 100,965.55
10k Expanded | 0.6036 | 0.05105 | 1,667,237.70 | 142,830.36
10k Unexpanded | 0.6128 | 0.02598 | 1,634,633.40 | 72,161.82
25k Expanded | 0.6198 | 0.04542 | 1,620,980.50 | 116,662.93
25k Unexpanded | 0.5478 | 0.0362 | 1,833,059.10 | 121,233.81
50k Expanded | 0.5104 | 0.04347 | 1,973,107.90 | 184,073.49
50k Unexpanded | 0.4528 | 0.03387 | 2,219,034.50 | 170,984.32
```
After a large enough quantity of range tombstones are written, range tombstone Gets can become faster than reading from an equivalent DB with several point tombstones.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4493
Differential Revision: D10842844
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: a7d44534f8120e6aabb65779d26c6b9df954c509
Summary:
Previously, range tombstones were accumulated from every level, which
was necessary if a range tombstone in a higher level covered a key in a lower
level. However, RangeDelAggregator::AddTombstones's complexity is based on
the number of tombstones that are currently stored in it, which is wasteful in
the Get case, where we only need to know the highest sequence number of range
tombstones that cover the key from higher levels, and compute the highest covering
sequence number at the current level. This change introduces this optimization, and
removes the use of RangeDelAggregator from the Get path.
In the benchmark results, the following command was used to initialize the database:
```
./db_bench -db=/dev/shm/5k-rts -use_existing_db=false -benchmarks=filluniquerandom -write_buffer_size=1048576 -compression_type=lz4 -target_file_size_base=1048576 -max_bytes_for_level_base=4194304 -value_size=112 -key_size=16 -block_size=4096 -level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=true -num=5000000 -max_background_jobs=12 -benchmark_write_rate_limit=20971520 -range_tombstone_width=100 -writes_per_range_tombstone=100 -max_num_range_tombstones=50000 -bloom_bits=8
```
...and the following command was used to measure read throughput:
```
./db_bench -db=/dev/shm/5k-rts/ -use_existing_db=true -benchmarks=readrandom -disable_auto_compactions=true -num=5000000 -reads=100000 -threads=32
```
The filluniquerandom command was only run once, and the resulting database was used
to measure read performance before and after the PR. Both binaries were compiled with
`DEBUG_LEVEL=0`.
Readrandom results before PR:
```
readrandom : 4.544 micros/op 220090 ops/sec; 16.9 MB/s (63103 of 100000 found)
```
Readrandom results after PR:
```
readrandom : 11.147 micros/op 89707 ops/sec; 6.9 MB/s (63103 of 100000 found)
```
So it's actually slower right now, but this PR paves the way for future optimizations (see #4493).
----
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4449
Differential Revision: D10370575
Pulled By: abhimadan
fbshipit-source-id: 9a2e152be1ef36969055c0e9eb4beb0d96c11f4d
