Summary:
Currently users have no idea a key is add, delete or merge from TablePropertiesCollector call back. Add a new function to add it.
Also refactor the codes so that
(1) make table property collector and internal table property collector two separate data structures with the later one now exposed
(2) table builders only receive internal table properties
Test Plan: Add cases in table_properties_collector_test to cover both of old and new ways of using TablePropertiesCollector.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor.sugak, rven, igor
Reviewed By: rven, igor
Subscribers: meyering, yoshinorim, maykov, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35373
Summary:
Make db_stress built for ROCKSDB_LITE.
The test doesn't pass tough. It seg fault quickly. But I took a look and it doesn't seem to be related to lite version. Likely to be a bug inside RocksDB.
Test Plan: make db_stress
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, ljin, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28797
Summary: Previously I made `make check` work with -Wshadow, but there are some tools that are not compiled using `make check`.
Test Plan: make all
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin, sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28497
Summary:
Intead of passing callback function pointer and its arg on Table::Get()
interface, passing GetContext. This makes the interface cleaner and
possible better perf. Also adding a fast pass for SaveValue()
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24057
Summary:
MurmurHash becomes expensive when we do millions Get() a second in one
thread. Add this option to allow the first hash function to use identity
function as hash function. It results in QPS increase from 3.7M/s to
~4.3M/s. I did not observe improvement for end to end RocksDB
performance. This may be caused by other bottlenecks that I will address
in a separate diff.
Test Plan:
```
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=0
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.272us (3.7 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.138us (7.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.144us (6.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.123us (8.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.112us (8.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.251us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.107us (9.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.099us (10.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.116us (8.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.095us (10.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.096us (10.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.105us (9.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
[ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=1
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound
==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.230us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120
With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.159us (6.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600
With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (12.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080
With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.218us (4.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320
With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320
```
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23451
Summary:
As a preparation to support updating some options dynamically, I'd like
to first introduce ImmutableOptions, which is a subset of Options that
cannot be changed during the course of a DB lifetime without restart.
ColumnFamily will keep both Options and ImmutableOptions. Any component
below ColumnFamily should only take ImmutableOptions in their
constructor. Other options should be taken from APIs, which will be
allowed to adjust dynamically.
I am yet to make changes to memtable and other related classes to take
ImmutableOptions in their ctor. That can be done in a seprate diff as
this one is already pretty big.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22545
Summary: Make table_reader_bench cover all the three table formats.
Test Plan: Run it using three options
Reviewers: radheshyamb, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22137
Summary: port::MemoryBarrier() is not recommended to use outside of port. Remove it.
Test Plan: run table_reader_bench
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21075
Summary:
Since we have a lot of options for PlainTable, add a struct PlainTableOptions
to manage them
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20175
Summary:
also add an override option total_order_iteration if you want to use full
iterator with prefix_extractor
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, haobo, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17805
Summary: Added benchmark functionality on the lines of folly/Benchmark.h
Test Plan: Added unit tests
Reviewers: igor, haobo, sdong, ljin, yhchiang, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17973
Summary: Compiling for iOS has by default turned on -Wmissing-prototypes, which causes rocksdb to fail compiling. This diff turns on -Wmissing-prototypes in our compile options and cleans up all functions with missing prototypes.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17649
Summary:
(1) Fix SanitizeOptions() to also check HashLinkList. The current
dynamic case just happens to work because the 2 classes have the same
layout.
(2) Do not delete SliceTransform object in HashSkipListFactory and
HashLinkListFactory destructor. Reason: SanitizeOptions() enforces
prefix_extractor and SliceTransform to be the same object when
Hash**Factory is used. This makes the behavior strange: when
Hash**Factory is used, prefix_extractor will be released by RocksDB. If
other memtable factory is used, prefix_extractor should be released by
user.
Test Plan: db_bench && make asan_check
Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16587
Summary: Fix table_reader_bench after some interface changes. Add it to make to avoid future breaking
Test Plan: make table_reader_bench and run it with different options.
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16107
Summary: In PlainTable, use one single byte to represent 8 bytes of internal bytes, if seqID = 0 and it is value type (which should be common for bottom most files). It is to save 7 bytes for uncompressed cases.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15489
Summary:
Some changes to PlainTable format:
(1) support variable key length
(2) use user defined slice transformer to extract prefixes
(3) Run some test cases against PlainTable in db_test and table_test
Test Plan: test db_test
Reviewers: haobo, kailiu
CC: dhruba, igor, leveldb, nkg-
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14457
Summary:
A Simple plain table format. No block structure. When creating the table reader, scanning the full table to create indexes.
Test Plan:Add unit test
Reviewers:haobo,dhruba,kailiu
CC:
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Summary: This patch adds an option to table_reader_bench that queries run against DB level (which has one table). It is useful if user wants to see the extra costs DB level introduces.
Test Plan: Run the benchmark with and without the new parameter
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13863
Summary: Iterator benchmark case is timed incorrectly. Fix it
Test Plan: Run the benchmark
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13845
Summary: It is a very simple benchmark to measure a Table implementation's Get() and iterator performance if all the data is in memory.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13743
