Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11807
For now, RocksDB has limited support for using merge with wide columns: when a bunch of merge operands have to be applied to a wide-column base value, RocksDB currently passes only the value of the default column to the application's `MergeOperator`, which means there is no way to update any other columns during a merge. As a first step in making this more general, the patch adds a new API `FullMergeV3` to `MergeOperator`.
`FullMergeV3`'s interface enables applications to receive a plain, wide-column, or non-existent base value as merge input, and to produce a new plain value, a new wide-column value, or an existing operand as merge output. Note that there are no limitations on the column names and values if the merge result is a wide-column entity. Also, the interface is general in the sense that it makes it possible e.g. for a merge that takes a plain base value and some deltas to produce a wide-column entity as a result.
For backward compatibility, the default implementation of `FullMergeV3` falls back to `FullMergeV2` and implements the current logic where merge operands are applied to the default column of the base entity and any other columns are unchanged. (Note that with `FullMergeV3` in the `MergeOperator` interface, this behavior will become customizable.)
This patch just introduces the new API and the default backward compatible implementation. I plan to integrate `FullMergeV3` into the query and compaction logic in subsequent diffs.
Reviewed By: jaykorean
Differential Revision: D49117253
fbshipit-source-id: 109e016f25cd130fc504790818d927bae7fec6bd
Summary:
Ran `find ./db/ -type f | xargs clang-format -i`. Excluded minor changes it tried to make on db/db_impl/. Everything else it changed was directly under db/ directory. Included minor manual touchups mentioned in PR commit history.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10910
Reviewed By: riversand963
Differential Revision: D40880683
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: cfe26cda05b3fb9a72e3cb82c286e21d8c5c4174
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary: It's not really nice to call user's API with garbage data in new_value. This diff makes sure that new_value is empty before calling the merge operator.
Test Plan: Added assert to Merge operator in merge_test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40773
Summary:
Add assert(operands_list.size() >= 2) in MergeOperator::PartialMergeMulti
to ensure it's only be called when we have at least two merge operands.
Test Plan: run merge_test and stringappend_test.
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17169
Summary:
Fix a bug that PartialMergeMulti will try to merge the first operand
with an empty slice.
Test Plan: run stringappend_test and merge_test.
Reviewers: haobo, igor
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17157
Summary:
* PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands.
* Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum
number of operands to trigger partial merge.
* This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also
includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for
partial merge.
Test Plan:
* make check all
* develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two
operands.
TODOs (from Schalk):
* Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2.
* Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably
use results of task #2837810.)
* Add description of problem to doc/index.html.
* Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes.
Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary:
-Added null checks and revisions to DBIter::MergeValuesNewToOld()
-Added DBIter test to stringappend_test
-Major fix with Merge and TTL
More plans for fixes later.
Test Plan:
-make clean; make stringappend_test -j 32; ./stringappend_test
-make all check;
Reviewers: haobo, emayanke, vamsi, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12315
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.
I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.
This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.
NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!
Test Plan:
-This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
-I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
-I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
-I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
-I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
-A lot of feedback from the reviewers.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
Levi Tamasi