Summary:
Separate a smal subset of tests in DBTest to DBBasicTest. Tests in DBTest don't have to run in CI tests on platforms like OSX, as long as they are covered by Linux.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1924
Differential Revision: D4616702
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: 13e6549
Summary:
Remove ReRuns as they only waste time.
Add env_basic_test to get more foundation coverage.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1788
Differential Revision: D4431433
Pulled By: IslamAbdelRahman
fbshipit-source-id: 50d07f8
Conditionally retrofit thread_posix for use with std::thread
and reuse the same logic. Posix users continue using Posix interfaces.
Enable XPRESS compression in test runs.
Fix master introduced signed/unsigned mismatch.
Add sequential rerun for any failed tests. Add env_test case.
Limit concurrency
Allow to specify individual tests
Take $Limit into account when displaying number of tests
Test code errors are currently blocking Windows Release builew
We do not want spend time building in Release what we can not run
We want to eliminate a source of most frequent errors when people
check-in test only code which can not be built in Release.
This feature will work only if you invoke msbuild against rocksdb.sln
Invoking it against ALL_BUILD target will attempt to build everything.
Add an optimized build config switch for faster test runs
Change compiler options to introduce more opitmizations and be more inline with MS internal switches.
Make appveyor build to utilize all the avaiable cores on the VM (parallel)
Introduce new appveyor configuration for daily test runs as it would take too long
to run db_test after each checkin even in paralell.
With some exclusions we make it in 38 minutes. We currently fail to install ramdisk during the build.
Add a powershell script to faicilitate paralell run for db_test cases.
Summary: Check in a simple auto-build manfiest so that developers can issue ad-hoc build for Windows in Appveyor.
Test Plan: Run it in test branch test_appveyor and it works well.
Reviewers: kradhakrishnan, rven, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43839
