Commit graph

76 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Changyu Bi 0ff7713112 Handoff checksum during WAL replay (#10212)
Summary:
Added checksum protection for write batch content read from WAL to when per key-value checksum is computed on the write batch. This gives full coverage on write batch integrity of WAL replay to memtable.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10212

Test Plan:
- Added unit test and the existing tests (replay code path covers the change in this PR): `make -j32 check`
- Stress test: ran `db_stress` for 30min.
- Perf regression:
```
# setup
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/100MB_WAL_DB/ ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -write_buffer_size=1048576000
# benchmark db open time
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/100MB_WAL_DB/ /usr/bin/time ./db_bench -use_existing_db=true -benchmarks=overwrite -write_buffer_size=1048576000 -writes=1 -report_open_timing=true

For 20 runs, pre-PR avg: 3734.31ms, post-PR avg: 3790.06 ms (~1.5% regression).

Pre-PR
OpenDb:     3714.36 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3622.71 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3591.17 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3674.7 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3615.79 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3982.83 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3650.6 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3809.26 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3576.44 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3638.12 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3845.68 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3677.32 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3659.64 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3837.55 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3899.64 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3840.72 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3802.71 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3573.27 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3895.76 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3778.02 milliseconds

Post-PR:
OpenDb:     3880.46 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3709.02 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3954.67 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3955.64 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3958.64 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3631.28 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3721 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3729.89 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3730.55 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3966.32 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3685.54 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3573.17 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3703.75 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3873.62 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3704.4 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3820.98 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3721.62 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3770.86 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3949.78 milliseconds
OpenDb:     3760.07 milliseconds
```

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D37302092

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 7346e625f453ce4c0e5d708776cd1fb2af6b068b
2022-07-05 15:44:35 -07:00
Levi Tamasi c73d2a9d18 Add API for writing wide-column entities (#10242)
Summary:
The patch builds on https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9915 and adds
a new API called `PutEntity` that can be used to write a wide-column entity
to the database. The new API is added to both `DB` and `WriteBatch`. Note
that currently there is no way to retrieve these entities; more precisely, all
read APIs (`Get`, `MultiGet`, and iterator) return `NotSupported` when they
encounter a wide-column entity that is required to answer a query. Read-side
support (as well as other missing functionality like `Merge`, compaction filter,
and timestamp support) will be added in later PRs.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10242

Test Plan: `make check`

Reviewed By: riversand963

Differential Revision: D37369748

Pulled By: ltamasi

fbshipit-source-id: 7f5e412359ed7a400fd80b897dae5599dbcd685d
2022-06-25 15:30:47 -07:00
Andrew Kryczka 5d6005c780 Add WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key (#10037)
Summary:
Added an option, `WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key`, that controls how many bytes per key we use for integrity protection in `WriteBatch`. It takes effect when `WriteBatch::GetProtectionBytesPerKey() == 0`.

Currently the only supported value is eight. Invoking a user API with it set to any other nonzero value will result in `Status::NotSupported` returned to the user.

There is also a bug fix for integrity protection with `inplace_callback`, where we forgot to take into account the possible change in varint length when calculating KV checksum for the final encoded buffer.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10037

Test Plan:
- Manual
  - Set default value of `WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key` to eight and ran `make check -j24`
  - Enabled in MyShadow for 1+ week
- Automated
  - Unit tests have a `WriteMode` that enables the integrity protection via `WriteOptions`
  - Crash test - in most cases, use `WriteOptions::protection_bytes_per_key` to enable integrity protection

Reviewed By: cbi42

Differential Revision: D36614569

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: 8650087ceac9b61b560f1e5fafe5e1baf9c725fb
2022-06-16 23:10:07 -07:00
Changyu Bi 9882652b0e Verify write batch checksum before WAL (#10114)
Summary:
Context: WriteBatch can have key-value checksums when it was created `with protection_bytes_per_key > 0`.
This PR added checksum verification for write batches before they are written to WAL.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10114

Test Plan:
- Added new unit tests to db_kv_checksum_test.cc: `make check -j32`
- benchmark on performance regression: `./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom[-X20] -db=/dev/shm/test_rocksdb -write_batch_protection_bytes_per_key=8`
  - Pre-PR:
`
fillrandom [AVG    20 runs] : 198875 (± 3006) ops/sec;   22.0 (± 0.3) MB/sec
`
  - Post-PR:
`
fillrandom [AVG    20 runs] : 196487 (± 2279) ops/sec;   21.7 (± 0.3) MB/sec
`
  Mean regressed about 1% (198875 -> 196487 ops/sec).

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D36917464

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 29beb74edf65f04b1a890b4f650d873dc7ed790d
2022-06-15 13:43:58 -07:00
Yanqin Jin 6f12599863 Support WBWI for keys having timestamps (#9603)
Summary:
This PR supports inserting keys to a `WriteBatchWithIndex` for column families that enable user-defined timestamps
and reading the keys back. **The index does not have timestamps.**

Writing a key to WBWI is unchanged, because the underlying WriteBatch already supports it.
When reading the keys back, we need to make sure to distinguish between keys with and without timestamps before
comparison.

When user calls `GetFromBatchAndDB()`, no timestamp is needed to query the batch, but a timestamp has to be
provided to query the db. The assumption is that data in the batch must be newer than data from the db.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9603

Test Plan: make check

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D34354849

Pulled By: riversand963

fbshipit-source-id: d25d1f84e2240ce543e521fa30595082fb8db9a0
2022-02-22 14:23:01 -08:00
Yanqin Jin 3122cb4358 Revise APIs related to user-defined timestamp (#8946)
Summary:
ajkr reminded me that we have a rule of not including per-kv related data in `WriteOptions`.
Namely, `WriteOptions` should not include information about "what-to-write", but should just
include information about "how-to-write".

According to this rule, `WriteOptions::timestamp` (experimental) is clearly a violation. Therefore,
this PR removes `WriteOptions::timestamp` for compliance.
After the removal, we need to pass timestamp info via another set of APIs. This PR proposes a set
of overloaded functions `Put(write_opts, key, value, ts)`, `Delete(write_opts, key, ts)`, and
`SingleDelete(write_opts, key, ts)`. Planned to add `Write(write_opts, batch, ts)`, but its complexity
made me reconsider doing it in another PR (maybe).

For better checking and returning error early, we also add a new set of APIs to `WriteBatch` that take
extra `timestamp` information when writing to `WriteBatch`es.
These set of APIs in `WriteBatchWithIndex` are currently not supported, and are on our TODO list.

Removed `WriteBatch::AssignTimestamps()` and renamed `WriteBatch::AssignTimestamp()` to
`WriteBatch::UpdateTimestamps()` since this method require that all keys have space for timestamps
allocated already and multiple timestamps can be updated.

The constructor of `WriteBatch` now takes a fourth argument `default_cf_ts_sz` which is the timestamp
size of the default column family. This will be used to allocate space when calling APIs that do not
specify a column family handle.

Also, updated `DB::Get()`, `DB::MultiGet()`, `DB::NewIterator()`, `DB::NewIterators()` methods, replacing
some assertions about timestamp to returning Status code.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8946

Test Plan:
make check
./db_bench -benchmarks=fillseq,fillrandom,readrandom,readseq,deleterandom -user_timestamp_size=8
./db_stress --user_timestamp_size=8 -nooverwritepercent=0 -test_secondary=0 -secondary_catch_up_one_in=0 -continuous_verification_interval=0

Make sure there is no perf regression by running the following
```
./db_bench_opt -db=/dev/shm/rocksdb -use_existing_db=0 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=256 -level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=256 -level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=256 -disable_wal=1 -duration=10 -benchmarks=fillrandom
```

Before this PR
```
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdb]
fillrandom   :       1.831 micros/op 546235 ops/sec;   60.4 MB/s
```
After this PR
```
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdb]
fillrandom   :       1.820 micros/op 549404 ops/sec;   60.8 MB/s
```

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D33721359

Pulled By: riversand963

fbshipit-source-id: c131561534272c120ffb80711d42748d21badf09
2022-02-01 22:19:01 -08:00
Yanqin Jin 5455cacd18 Fix link error reported in issue 9272 (#9278)
Summary:
As title, Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9272
Since TimestampAssigner-related classes needs to access
`WriteBatch::ProtectionInfo` objects which is for internal use only,
it's difficult to make `AssignTimestamp` methods a template and put them
in the same public header, `include/rocksdb/write_batch.h`.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9278

Test Plan:
```
make check
# Also manually test following the repro-steps in issue 9272
```

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D33012686

Pulled By: riversand963

fbshipit-source-id: 89f24a86a1170125bd0b94ef3b32e69aa08bd949
2021-12-10 20:33:46 -08:00
Yanqin Jin bd513fd075 Add commit marker with timestamp (#9266)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9266

This diff adds a new tag `CommitWithTimestamp`. Currently, there is no API to trigger writing
this tag to WAL, thus it is unavailable to users.
This is an ongoing effort to add user-defined timestamp support to write-committed transactions.
This diff also indicates all column families that may potentially participate in the same
transaction must either disable timestamp or have the same timestamp format, since
`CommitWithTimestamp` tag is followed by a single byte-array denoting the commit
timestamp of the transaction. We will enforce this checking in a future diff. We keep this
diff small.

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D31721350

fbshipit-source-id: e1450811443647feb6ca01adec4c8aaae270ffc6
2021-12-10 11:05:35 -08:00
Yanqin Jin 924616526a Update WriteBatch::AssignTimestamp() and Add (#9205)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9205

Update WriteBatch::AssignTimestamp() APIs so that they take an
additional argument, i.e. a function object called `checker` indicating the user-specified logic of performing
checks on timestamp sizes.

WriteBatch is a building block used by multiple other RocksDB components, each of which may track
timestamp information in different data structures. For example, transaction can either write to
`WriteBatchWithIndex` which is a `WriteBatch` with index, or write directly to raw `WriteBatch` if
`Transaction::DisableIndexing()` is called.
`WriteBatchWithIndex` keeps mapping from column family id to comparator, and transaction needs
to keep similar information for the `WriteBatch` if user calls `Transaction::DisableIndexing()` (dynamically)
so that we will know the size of each timestamp later. The bookkeeping info maintained by `WriteBatchWithIndex`
and `Transaction` should not overlap.
When we later call `WriteBatch::AssignTimestamp()`, we need to use these data structures to guarantee
that we do not accidentally assign timestamps for keys from column families that disable timestamp.

Reviewed By: ltamasi

Differential Revision: D31735186

fbshipit-source-id: 8b1709ed880ac72f995aa9e012e5873b290840a7
2021-11-30 22:33:00 -08:00
Andrew Kryczka d648cb47b9 Adapt key-value checksum for timestamp-suffixed keys (#8914)
Summary:
After https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/8725, keys added to `WriteBatch` may be timestamp-suffixed, while `WriteBatch` has no awareness of the timestamp size. Therefore, `WriteBatch` can no longer calculate timestamp checksum separately from the rest of the key's checksum in all cases.

This PR changes the definition of key in KV checksum to include the timestamp suffix. That way we do not need to worry about where the timestamp begins within the key. I believe the only practical effect of this change is now `AssignTimestamp()` requires recomputing the whole key checksum (`UpdateK()`) rather than just the timestamp portion (`UpdateT()`).

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8914

Test Plan:
run stress command that used to fail

```
$ ./db_stress --batch_protection_bytes_per_key=8 -clear_column_family_one_in=0 -test_batches_snapshots=1
```

Reviewed By: riversand963

Differential Revision: D30925715

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: c143f7ccb46c0efb390ad57ef415c250d754deff
2021-09-14 13:14:39 -07:00
Yanqin Jin 066b51126d Several simple local code clean-ups (#8565)
Summary:
This PR tries to remove some unnecessary checks as well as unreachable code blocks to
improve readability. An obvious non-public API method naming typo is also corrected.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8565

Test Plan: make check

Reviewed By: lth

Differential Revision: D29963984

Pulled By: riversand963

fbshipit-source-id: cc96e8f09890e5cfe9b20eadb63bdca5484c150a
2021-07-30 12:07:49 -07:00
Andrew Kryczka 78ee8564ad Integrity protection for live updates to WriteBatch (#7748)
Summary:
This PR adds the foundation classes for key-value integrity protection and the first use case: protecting live updates from the source buffers added to `WriteBatch` through the destination buffer in `MemTable`. The width of the protection info is not yet configurable -- only eight bytes per key is supported. This PR allows users to enable protection by constructing `WriteBatch` with `protection_bytes_per_key == 8`. It does not yet expose a way for users to get integrity protection via other write APIs (e.g., `Put()`, `Merge()`, `Delete()`, etc.).

The foundation classes (`ProtectionInfo.*`) embed the coverage info in their type, and provide `Protect.*()` and `Strip.*()` functions to navigate between types with different coverage. For making bytes per key configurable (for powers of two up to eight) in the future, these classes are templated on the unsigned integer type used to store the protection info. That integer contains the XOR'd result of hashes with independent seeds for all covered fields. For integer fields, the hash is computed on the raw unadjusted bytes, so the result is endian-dependent. The most significant bytes are truncated when the hash value (8 bytes) is wider than the protection integer.

When `WriteBatch` is constructed with `protection_bytes_per_key == 8`, we hold a `ProtectionInfoKVOTC` (i.e., one that covers key, value, optype aka `ValueType`, timestamp, and CF ID) for each entry added to the batch. The protection info is generated from the original buffers passed by the user, as well as the original metadata generated internally. When writing to memtable, each entry is transformed to a `ProtectionInfoKVOTS` (i.e., dropping coverage of CF ID and adding coverage of sequence number), since at that point we know the sequence number, and have already selected a memtable corresponding to a particular CF. This protection info is verified once the entry is encoded in the `MemTable` buffer.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7748

Test Plan:
- an integration test to verify a wide variety of single-byte changes to the encoded `MemTable` buffer are caught
- add to stress/crash test to verify it works in variety of configs/operations without intentional corruption
- [deferred] unit tests for `ProtectionInfo.*` classes for edge cases like KV swap, `SliceParts` and `Slice` APIs are interchangeable, etc.

Reviewed By: pdillinger

Differential Revision: D25754492

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: e481bac6c03c2ab268be41359730f1ceb9964866
2021-01-29 12:18:58 -08:00
sdong fdf882ded2 Replace namespace name "rocksdb" with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE (#6433)
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433

Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.

Differential Revision: D19977691

fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
2020-02-20 12:09:57 -08:00
Lingjing You 1a928c22a0 Add insert hints for each writebatch (#5728)
Summary:
Add insert hints for each writebatch so that they can be used in concurrent write, and add write option to enable it.

Bench result (qps):

`./db_bench --benchmarks=fillseq -allow_concurrent_memtable_write=true -num=4000000 -batch-size=1 -threads=1 -db=/data3/ylj/tmp -write_buffer_size=536870912 -num_column_families=4`

master:

| batch size \ thread num | 1       | 2       | 4       | 8       |
| ----------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- |
| 1                       | 387883  | 220790  | 308294  | 490998  |
| 10                      | 1397208 | 978911  | 1275684 | 1733395 |
| 100                     | 2045414 | 1589927 | 1798782 | 2681039 |
| 1000                    | 2228038 | 1698252 | 1839877 | 2863490 |

fillseq with writebatch hint:

| batch size \ thread num | 1       | 2       | 4       | 8       |
| ----------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- |
| 1                       | 286005  | 223570  | 300024  | 466981  |
| 10                      | 970374  | 813308  | 1399299 | 1753588 |
| 100                     | 1962768 | 1983023 | 2676577 | 3086426 |
| 1000                    | 2195853 | 2676782 | 3231048 | 3638143 |
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5728

Differential Revision: D17297240

fbshipit-source-id: b053590a6d77871f1ef2f911a7bd013b3899b26c
2019-09-12 17:15:18 -07:00
Wilfried Goesgens fbab9913e2 upgrade gtest 1.7.0 => 1.8.1 for json result writing
Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5332

Differential Revision: D17242232

fbshipit-source-id: c0d4646556a1335e51ac7382b986ca7f6ced7b64
2019-09-09 11:24:11 -07:00
Zhongyi Xie 2f41ecfe75 Refactor trimming logic for immutable memtables (#5022)
Summary:
MyRocks currently sets `max_write_buffer_number_to_maintain` in order to maintain enough history for transaction conflict checking. The effectiveness of this approach depends on the size of memtables. When memtables are small, it may not keep enough history; when memtables are large, this may consume too much memory.
We are proposing a new way to configure memtable list history: by limiting the memory usage of immutable memtables. The new option is `max_write_buffer_size_to_maintain` and it will take precedence over the old `max_write_buffer_number_to_maintain` if they are both set to non-zero values. The new option accounts for the total memory usage of flushed immutable memtables and mutable memtable. When the total usage exceeds the limit, RocksDB may start dropping immutable memtables (which is also called trimming history), starting from the oldest one.
The semantics of the old option actually works both as an upper bound and lower bound. History trimming will start if number of immutable memtables exceeds the limit, but it will never go below (limit-1) due to history trimming.
In order the mimic the behavior with the new option, history trimming will stop if dropping the next immutable memtable causes the total memory usage go below the size limit. For example, assuming the size limit is set to 64MB, and there are 3 immutable memtables with sizes of 20, 30, 30. Although the total memory usage is 80MB > 64MB, dropping the oldest memtable will reduce the memory usage to 60MB < 64MB, so in this case no memtable will be dropped.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5022

Differential Revision: D14394062

Pulled By: miasantreble

fbshipit-source-id: 60457a509c6af89d0993f988c9b5c2aa9e45f5c5
2019-08-23 13:55:34 -07:00
Manuel Ung f622ca2c7c WriteUnPrepared: savepoint support (#5627)
Summary:
Add savepoint support when the current transaction has flushed unprepared batches.

Rolling back to savepoint is similar to rolling back a transaction. It requires the set of keys that have changed since the savepoint, re-reading the keys at the snapshot at that savepoint, and the restoring the old keys by writing out another unprepared batch.

For this strategy to work though, we must be capable of reading keys at a savepoint. This does not work if keys were written out using the same sequence number before and after a savepoint. Therefore, when we flush out unprepared batches, we must split the batch by savepoint if any savepoints exist.

eg. If we have the following:
```
Put(A)
Put(B)
Put(C)
SetSavePoint()
Put(D)
Put(E)
SetSavePoint()
Put(F)
```

Then we will write out 3 separate unprepared batches:
```
Put(A) 1
Put(B) 1
Put(C) 1
Put(D) 2
Put(E) 2
Put(F) 3
```

This is so that when we rollback to eg. the first savepoint, we can just read keys at snapshot_seq = 1.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5627

Differential Revision: D16584130

Pulled By: lth

fbshipit-source-id: 6d100dd548fb20c4b76661bd0f8a2647e64477fa
2019-07-31 13:39:39 -07:00
Manuel Ung 8ad63a4b86 WriteUnPrepared: Add new WAL marker kTypeBeginUnprepareXID (#4069)
Summary:
This adds a new WAL marker of type kTypeBeginUnprepareXID.

Also, DBImpl now contains a field called batch_per_txn (meaning one WriteBatch per transaction, or possibly multiple WriteBatches). This would also indicate that this DB is using WriteUnprepared policy.

Recovery code would be able to make use of this extra field on DBImpl in a separate diff. For now, it is just used to determine whether the WAL is compatible or not.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4069

Differential Revision: D8675099

Pulled By: lth

fbshipit-source-id: ca27cae1738e46d65f2bb92860fc759deb874749
2018-06-28 18:58:29 -07:00
Bruce Mitchener a3a3f5497c Fix some typos in comments and docs.
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3568

Differential Revision: D7170953

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: 9cfb8dd88b7266da920c0e0c1e10fb2c5af0641c
2018-03-08 10:27:25 -08:00
Siying Dong ef29d2a234 Explictly fail writes if key or value is not smaller than 4GB
Summary:
Right now, users will encounter unexpected bahavior if they use key or value larger than 4GB. We should explicitly fail the queriers.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3484

Differential Revision: D6953895

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: b60491e1af064fc5d52971956661f6c18ceac24f
2018-02-09 14:57:54 -08:00
Maysam Yabandeh 88d8b2a2f5 WritePrepared Txn: Duplicate Keys, Txn Part
Summary:
This patch takes advantage of memtable being able to detect duplicate <key,seq> and returning TryAgain to handle duplicate keys in WritePrepared Txns. Through WriteBatchWithIndex's index it detects existence of at least a duplicate key in the write batch. If duplicate key was reported, it then pays the cost of counting the number of sub-patches by iterating over the write batch and pass it to DBImpl::Write. DB will make use of the provided batch_count to assign proper sequence numbers before sending them to the WAL. When later inserting the batch to the memtable, it increases the seq each time memtbale reports a duplicate (a sub-patch in our counting) and tries again.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3455

Differential Revision: D6873699

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: db8487526c3a5dc1ddda0ea49f0f979b26ae648d
2018-02-05 18:43:24 -08:00
Maysam Yabandeh 2edc92bc28 WritePrepared Txn: cross-compatibility test
Summary:
Add tests to ensure that WritePrepared and WriteCommitted policies are cross compatible when the db WAL is empty. This is important when the admin want to switch between the policies. In such case, before the switch the admin needs to empty the WAL by i) committing/rollbacking all the pending transactions, ii) FlushMemTables
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3118

Differential Revision: D6227247

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: bcde3d92c1e89cda3b9cfa69f6a20af5d8993db7
2017-11-11 11:28:37 -08:00
Maysam Yabandeh 17731a43a6 WritePrepared Txn: Optimize for recoverable state
Summary:
GetCommitTimeWriteBatch is currently used to store some state as part of commit in 2PC. In MyRocks it is specifically used to store some data that would be needed only during recovery. So it is not need to be stored in memtable right after each commit.
This patch enables an optimization to write the GetCommitTimeWriteBatch only to the WAL. The batch will be written to memtable during recovery when the WAL is replayed. To cover the case when WAL is deleted after memtable flush, the batch is also buffered and written to memtable right before each memtable flush.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3071

Differential Revision: D6148023

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: 2d09bae5565abe2017c0327421010d5c0d55eaa7
2017-11-01 17:26:46 -07:00
Maysam Yabandeh ec6c5383d0 WritePrepared Txn: end-to-end tests
Summary:
Enable WritePrepared policy for existing transaction tests.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2972

Differential Revision: D5993614

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: d1eb53e2920c4e2a56434bb001231c98426f3509
2017-10-06 14:26:45 -07:00
Yi Wu d1cab2b64e Add ValueType::kTypeBlobIndex
Summary:
Add kTypeBlobIndex value type, which will be used by blob db only, to insert a (key, blob_offset) KV pair. The purpose is to
1. Make it possible to open existing rocksdb instance as blob db. Existing value will be of kTypeIndex type, while value inserted by blob db will be of kTypeBlobIndex.
2. Make rocksdb able to detect if the db contains value written by blob db, if so return error.
3. Make it possible to have blob db optionally store value in SST file (with kTypeValue type) or as a blob value (with kTypeBlobIndex type).

The root db (DBImpl) basically pretended kTypeBlobIndex are normal value on write. On Get if is_blob is provided, return whether the value read is of kTypeBlobIndex type, or return Status::NotSupported() status if is_blob is not provided. On scan allow_blob flag is pass and if the flag is true, return wether the value is of kTypeBlobIndex type via iter->IsBlob().

Changes on blob db side will be in a separate patch.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2886

Differential Revision: D5838431

Pulled By: yiwu-arbug

fbshipit-source-id: 3c5306c62bc13bb11abc03422ec5cbcea1203cca
2017-10-03 09:11:23 -07:00
Maysam Yabandeh 60beefd6e0 WritePrepared Txn: Advance seq one per batch
Summary:
By default the seq number in DB is increased once per written key. WritePrepared txns requires the seq to be increased once per the entire batch so that the seq would be used as the prepare timestamp by which the transaction is identified. Also we need to increase seq for the commit marker since it would give a unique id to the commit timestamp of transactions.

Two unit tests are added to verify our understanding of how the seq should be increased. The recovery path requires much more work and is left to another patch.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2885

Differential Revision: D5837843

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: a08960b93d727e1cf438c254d0c2636fb133cc1c
2017-09-18 14:45:08 -07:00
Siying Dong 3c327ac2d0 Change RocksDB License
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2589

Differential Revision: D5431502

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: 8ebf8c87883daa9daa54b2303d11ce01ab1f6f75
2017-07-15 16:11:23 -07:00
Yi Wu ad19eb8686 Fixing blob db sequence number handling
Summary:
Blob db rely on base db returning sequence number through write batch after DB::Write(). However after recent changes to the write path, DB::Writ()e no longer return sequence number in some cases. Fixing it by have WriteBatchInternal::InsertInto() always encode sequence number into write batch.

Stacking on #2375.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2385

Differential Revision: D5148358

Pulled By: yiwu-arbug

fbshipit-source-id: 8bda0aa07b9334ed03ed381548b39d167dc20c33
2017-05-31 10:56:45 -07:00
Yi Wu 07bdcb91fe New WriteImpl to pipeline WAL/memtable write
Summary:
PipelineWriteImpl is an alternative approach to WriteImpl. In WriteImpl, only one thread is allow to write at the same time. This thread will do both WAL and memtable writes for all write threads in the write group. Pending writers wait in queue until the current writer finishes. In the pipeline write approach, two queue is maintained: one WAL writer queue and one memtable writer queue. All writers (regardless of whether they need to write WAL) will still need to first join the WAL writer queue, and after the house keeping work and WAL writing, they will need to join memtable writer queue if needed. The benefit of this approach is that
1. Writers without memtable writes (e.g. the prepare phase of two phase commit) can exit write thread once WAL write is finish. They don't need to wait for memtable writes in case of group commit.
2. Pending writers only need to wait for previous WAL writer finish to be able to join the write thread, instead of wait also for previous memtable writes.

Merging #2056 and #2058 into this PR.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2286

Differential Revision: D5054606

Pulled By: yiwu-arbug

fbshipit-source-id: ee5b11efd19d3e39d6b7210937b11cefdd4d1c8d
2017-05-19 14:26:42 -07:00
Siying Dong d616ebea23 Add GPLv2 as an alternative license.
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2226

Differential Revision: D4967547

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: dd3b58ae1e7a106ab6bb6f37ab5c88575b125ab4
2017-04-27 18:06:12 -07:00
Manuel Ung 1f8b119ed6 Limit maximum memory used in the WriteBatch representation
Summary:
Extend TransactionOptions to include max_write_batch_size which determines the maximum size of the writebatch representation. If memory limit is exceeded, the operation will abort with subcode kMemoryLimit.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2124

Differential Revision: D4861842

Pulled By: lth

fbshipit-source-id: 46fd172ea67cc90bbba829bf0d70cfab2261c161
2017-04-10 15:42:26 -07:00
Reid Horuff 2c1f95291d Add facility to write only a portion of WriteBatch to WAL
Summary:
When constructing a write batch a client may now call MarkWalTerminationPoint() on that batch. No batch operations after this call will be added written to the WAL but will still be inserted into the Memtable. This facility is used to remove one of the three WriteImpl calls in 2PC transactions. This produces a ~1% perf improvement.

```
RocksDB - unoptimized 2pc, sync_binlog=1, disable_2pc=off
INFO 2016-08-31 14:30:38,814 [main]: REQUEST PHASE COMPLETED. 75000000 requests done in 2619 seconds. Requests/second = 28628

RocksDB - optimized 2pc , sync_binlog=1, disable_2pc=off
INFO 2016-08-31 16:26:59,442 [main]: REQUEST PHASE COMPLETED. 75000000 requests done in 2581 seconds. Requests/second = 29054
```

Test Plan: Two unit tests added.

Reviewers: sdong, yiwu, IslamAbdelRahman

Reviewed By: yiwu

Subscribers: hermanlee4, dhruba, andrewkr

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64599
2016-10-07 11:32:10 -07:00
Andrew Kryczka 3771e37970 WriteBatch support for range deletion
Summary:
Add API to WriteBatch to store range deletions in its buffer
which are later added to memtable. In the WriteBatch buffer, a range
deletion is encoded as "<optype><CF ID (optional)><begin key><end key>".

With this diff, the range tombstones are stored inline with the data in
the memtable. It's useful for now because the test cases rely on the
data being accessible via memtable. My next step is to store range
tombstones in a separate area in the memtable.

Test Plan: unit tests

Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong, wanning

Reviewed By: wanning

Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61401
2016-08-16 08:16:04 -07:00
sdong 2a6d0cde72 Ignore stale logs while restarting DBs
Summary:
Stale log files can be deleted out of order. This can happen for various reasons. One of the reason is that no data is ever inserted to a column family and we have an optimization to update its log number, but not all the old log files are cleaned up (the case shown in the unit tests added). It can also happen when we simply delete multiple log files out of order.

This causes data corruption because we simply increase seqID after processing the next row and we may end up with writing data with smaller seqID than what is already flushed to memtables.

In DB recovery, for the oldest files we are replaying, if there it contains no data for any column family, we ignore the sequence IDs in the file.

Test Plan: Add two unit tests that fail without the fix.

Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, igor, yiwu

Reviewed By: yiwu

Subscribers: hermanlee4, yoshinorim, leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D60891
2016-07-25 11:47:31 -07:00
sdong 7b79238b65 Deprectate filter_deletes
Summary: filter_deltes is not a frequently used feature. Remove it.

Test Plan: Run all test suites.

Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman

Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman

Subscribers: leveldb, andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D59427
2016-06-17 10:30:47 -07:00
Reid Horuff a657ee9a9c [rocksdb] Recovery path sequence miscount fix
Summary:
Consider the following WAL with 4 batch entries prefixed with their sequence at time of memtable insert.
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(a)]
[1: BEGIN_PREPARE, PUT, PUT, PUT, PUT, END_PREPARE(b)]
[4: COMMIT(a)]
[7: COMMIT(b)]

The first two batches do not consume any sequence numbers so are both prefixed with seq=1.
For 2pc commit, memtable insertion takes place before COMMIT batch is written to WAL.
We can see that sequence number consumption takes place between WAL entries giving us the seemingly sparse sequence prefix for WAL entries.
This is a valid WAL.

Because with 2PC markers one WriteBatch points to another batch containing its inserts a writebatch can consume more or less sequence numbers than the number of sequence consuming entries that it contains.

We can see that, given the entries in the WAL, 6 sequence ids were consumed. Yet on recovery the maximum sequence consumed would be 7 + 3 (the number of sequence numbers consumed by COMMIT(b))

So, now upon recovery we must track the actual consumption of sequence numbers.
In the provided scenario there will be no sequence gaps, but it is possible to produce a sequence gap. This should not be a problem though. correct?

Test Plan: provided test.

Reviewers: sdong

Subscribers: andrewkr, leveldb, dhruba, hermanlee4

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57645
2016-05-10 14:06:07 -07:00
Reid Horuff 1b8a2e8fdd [rocksdb] Memtable Log Referencing and Prepared Batch Recovery
Summary:
This diff is built on top of WriteBatch modification: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54093 and adds the required functionality to rocksdb core necessary for rocksdb to support 2PC.

modfication of DBImpl::WriteImpl()
- added two arguments *uint64_t log_used = nullptr, uint64_t log_ref = 0;
- *log_used is an output argument which will return the log number which the incoming batch was inserted into, 0 if no WAL insert took place.
-  log_ref is a supplied log_number which all memtables inserted into will reference after the batch insert takes place. This number will reside in 'FindMinPrepLogReferencedByMemTable()' until all Memtables insertinto have flushed.

- Recovery/writepath is now aware of prepared batches and commit and rollback markers.

Test Plan: There is currently no test on this diff. All testing of this functionality takes place in the Transaction layer/diff but I will add some testing.

Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, sdong

Subscribers: leveldb, santoshb, andrewkr, vasilep, dhruba, hermanlee4

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56919
2016-05-10 14:06:07 -07:00
Reid Horuff 0460e9dcce Modification of WriteBatch to support two phase commit
Summary: Adds three new WriteBatch data types: Prepare(xid), Commit(xid), Rollback(xid). Prepare(xid) should precede the (single) operation to which is applies. There can obviously be multiple Prepare(xid) markers. There should only be one Rollback(xid) or Commit(xid) marker yet not both. None of this logic is currently enforced and will most likely be implemented further up such as in the memtableinserter. All three markers are similar to PutLogData in that they are writebatch meta-data, ie stored but not counted. All three markers differ from PutLogData in that they will actually be written to disk. As for WriteBatchWithIndex, Prepare, Commit, Rollback are all implemented just as PutLogData and none are tested just as PutLogData.

Test Plan: single unit test in write_batch_test.

Reviewers: hermanlee4, sdong, anthony

Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, vasilep, andrewkr

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57867
2016-05-10 14:06:07 -07:00
Andrew Kryczka 269f6b2e2d Revert "Modification of WriteBatch to support two phase commit"
Summary: Revert D54093 and D57453

Test Plan: running make check

Reviewers: horuff, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57819
2016-05-06 16:58:24 -07:00
Reid Horuff 6e56a114be Modification of WriteBatch to support two phase commit
Summary: Adds three new WriteBatch data types: Prepare(xid), Commit(xid), Rollback(xid). Prepare(xid) should precede the (single) operation to which is applies. There can obviously be multiple Prepare(xid) markers. There should only be one Rollback(xid) or Commit(xid) marker yet not both. None of this logic is currently enforced and will most likely be implemented further up such as in the memtableinserter. All three markers are similar to PutLogData in that they are writebatch meta-data, ie stored but not counted. All three markers differ from PutLogData in that they will actually be written to disk. As for WriteBatchWithIndex, Prepare, Commit, Rollback are all implemented just as PutLogData and none are tested just as PutLogData.

Test Plan: single unit test in write_batch_test.

Reviewers: hermanlee4, sdong, anthony

Subscribers: andrewkr, vasilep, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D54093
2016-04-29 11:50:30 -07:00
zensan 78711524b7 In all the places where log records are read, there was a check that
record.size() should not be less than 12.

This "magic number" seems to be the WriteBatch header (8 byte sequence
and 4 byte count).   Replaced all the places where "12" was used
by WriteBatchInternal::kHeader.
2016-03-30 23:05:22 +05:30
Baraa Hamodi 21e95811d1 Updated all copyright headers to the new format. 2016-02-09 15:12:00 -08:00
reid horuff 6f71d3b68b Improve perf of Pessimistic Transaction expirations (and optimistic transactions)
Summary:
copy from task 8196669:

1) Optimistic transactions do not support batching writes from different threads.
2) Pessimistic transactions do not support batching writes if an expiration time is set.

In these 2 cases, we currently do not do any write batching in DBImpl::WriteImpl() because there is a WriteCallback that could decide at the last minute to abort the write.  But we could support batching write operations with callbacks if we make sure to process the callbacks correctly.

To do this, we would first need to modify write_thread.cc to stop preventing writes with callbacks from being batched together.  Then we would need to change DBImpl::WriteImpl() to call all WriteCallback's in a batch, only write the batches that succeed, and correctly set the state of each batch's WriteThread::Writer.

Test Plan: Added test WriteWithCallbackTest to write_callback_test.cc which creates multiple client threads and verifies that writes are batched and executed properly.

Reviewers: hermanlee4, anthony, ngbronson

Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D52863
2016-02-05 10:44:13 -08:00
Nathan Bronson 7d87f02799 support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations.  Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention.  Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.

Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off).  This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex.  If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided.  This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).

Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield).  Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.

Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.

This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work.  It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.

My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive.  With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec.  Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads.  Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.

Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled

Reviewers: igor, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-12-25 11:03:40 -08:00
Nathan Bronson 6ce42dd075 Don't merge WriteBatch-es if WAL is disabled
Summary:
There's no need for WriteImpl to flatten the write batch group
into a single WriteBatch if the WAL is disabled.  This diff moves the
flattening into the WAL step, and skips flattening entirely if it isn't
needed.  It's good for about 5% speedup on a multi-threaded workload
with no WAL.

This diff also adds clarifying comments about the chance for partial
failure of WriteBatchInternal::InsertInto, and always sets bg_error_ if
the memtable state diverges from the logged state or if a WriteBatch
succeeds only partially.

Benchmark for speedup:
  db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=16 -batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=0 --num=200000 -level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999 -disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8 -max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000

Test Plan: asserts + make check

Reviewers: sdong, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50583
2015-11-12 10:50:38 -08:00
Andres Noetzli 014fd55adc Support for SingleDelete()
Summary:
This patch fixes #7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).

In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.

Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.

Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
  deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
  this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
2015-09-17 11:42:56 -07:00
agiardullo 8161bdb5a0 WriteBatch Save Points
Summary:
Support RollbackToSavePoint() in WriteBatch and WriteBatchWithIndex.  Support for partial transaction rollback is needed for MyRocks.

An alternate implementation of Transaction::RollbackToSavePoint() exists in D40869.  However, the other implementation is messier because it is implemented outside of WriteBatch.  This implementation is much cleaner and also exposes a potentially useful feature to WriteBatch.

Test Plan: Added unit tests

Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, maykov, yoshinorim, hermanlee4, spetrunia, sdong, yhchiang

Reviewed By: yhchiang

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42723
2015-07-29 16:54:23 -07:00
Reed Allman a0635ba3f6 WriteBatch.Merge w/ SliceParts support
also hooked up WriteBatchInternal
2015-05-29 04:30:03 -07:00
Lei Jin 8d3f8f9696 remove all remaining references to cfd->options()
Summary:
The very last reference happens in DBImpl::GetOptions()
I built with both DBImpl::GetOptions() and ColumnFamilyData::options() commented out

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29073
2014-11-18 10:20:10 -08:00
Igor Canadi 3d9e6f7759 Push model for flushing memtables
Summary:
When memtable is full it calls the registered callback. That callback then registers column family as needing the flush. Every write checks if there are some column families that need to be flushed. This completely eliminates the need for MakeRoomForWrite() function and simplifies our Write code-path.

There is some complexity with the concurrency when the column family is dropped. I made it a bit less complex by dropping the column family from the write thread in https://reviews.facebook.net/D22965. Let me know if you want to discuss this.

Test Plan: make check works. I'll also run db_stress with creating and dropping column families for a while.

Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, ljin

Reviewed By: ljin

Subscribers: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23067
2014-09-10 18:46:09 -07:00