Summary: I want to be able to set this through mongo config.
Test Plan: added unit test
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34599
Summary:
When having fixed max_bytes_for_level_base, the ratio of size of largest level and the second one can range from 0 to the multiplier. This makes LSM tree frequently irregular and unpredictable. It can also cause poor space amplification in some cases.
In this improvement (proposed by Igor Kabiljo), we introduce a parameter option.level_compaction_use_dynamic_max_bytes. When turning it on, RocksDB is free to pick a level base in the range of (options.max_bytes_for_level_base/options.max_bytes_for_level_multiplier, options.max_bytes_for_level_base] so that real level ratios are close to options.max_bytes_for_level_multiplier.
Test Plan: New unit tests and pass tests suites including valgrind.
Reviewers: MarkCallaghan, rven, yhchiang, igor, ikabiljo
Reviewed By: ikabiljo
Subscribers: yoshinorim, ikabiljo, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31437
Summary:
Summary:
Added a new option to ColumnFamllyOptions - optimize_filters_for_hits. This option can be used in the case where most
accesses to the store are key hits and we dont need to optimize performance for key misses.
This is useful when you have a very large database and most of your lookups succeed. The option allows the store to
not store and use filters in the last level (the largest level which contains data). These filters can take a large amount of
space for large databases (in memory and on-disk). For the last level, these filters are only useful for key misses and not
for key hits. If we are not optimizing for key misses, we can choose to not store these filters for that level.
This option is only provided for BlockBasedTable. We skip the filters when we are compacting
Test Plan:
1. Modified db_test toalso run tests with an additonal option (skip_filters_on_last_level)
2. Added another unit test to db_test which specifically tests that filters are being skipped
Reviewers: rven, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lgalanis, yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, rven, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33717
Summary:
In mongo, we currently have a single column family and I'd like to support setting rocksdb::Options from string. This diff provides an option to GetOptionsFromString()
There's one more problem. Currently GetColumnFamilyOptionsFromString() overwrites block_based options. In mongo I set default values for block_cache and some other values of BlockBasedTableOptions and I don't want them reset to default with GetOptionsFromString().
Test Plan: added unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33729
Summary: Add CappedFixTransform, which is the same as fixed length prefix extractor, except that when slice is shorter than the fixed length, it will use the full key.
Test Plan:
Add a test case for
db_test
options_test
and a new test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31887
Summary:
Make options_test runnable on ROCKSDB_LITE by blocking
those tests that require non-ROCKSDB_LITE feature.
Test Plan:
make options_test OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE -j32
./options_test
make clean
make options_test -j32
./options_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D32025
Summary:
This diff enables to configure prefix_extractor
string parameter as a CF option.
Test Plan: make all check, ./options_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D31653
Summary:
Add support to allow nested config for block-based table factory. The format looks like this:
"write_buffer_size=1024;block_based_table_factory={block_size=4k};max_write_buffer_num=2"
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, igor, ljin, jonahcohen
Reviewed By: jonahcohen
Subscribers: jonahcohen, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29223
Summary: We want to make sure people without gflags can compile RocksDB.
Test Plan: remove gflags, make all
Reviewers: sdong, rven, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29469
Summary: Created a CompatibleOptions object that can be used as a LevelDB Options object and then converted to a RocksDB Options object using the ConvertOptions() method.
Test Plan: Unit test included in diff.
Reviewers: ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: sdong, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28893
Summary:
Add unit support in options helper so we can specify, e.g., 10m for
10 megabytes.
Test Plan: Updated options_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D28977
Summary:
Fixed the following error in Mac:
./util/testharness.h:93:19: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned long' and 'const int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
BINARY_OP(IsEq, ==)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
./util/testharness.h:86:14: note: expanded from macro 'BINARY_OP'
if (! (x op y)) { \
^
util/options_test.cc:269:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'rocksdb::test::Tester::IsEq<unsigned long, int>' requested here
ASSERT_EQ(new_cf_opt.write_buffer_size, 5);
^
Test Plan:
options_test
Summary: Allow accepting Options as a string of key/value pairs
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24597
Summary: as title
Test Plan: options_test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23283
Summary:
Add a function GetOptions(), where based on four parameters users give: read/write amplification threshold, memory budget for mem tables and target DB size, it picks up a compaction style and parameters for them. Background threads are not touched yet.
One limit of this algorithm: since compression rate and key/value size are hard to predict, it's hard to predict level 0 file size from write buffer size. Simply make 1:1 ratio here.
Sample results: https://reviews.facebook.net/P477
Test Plan: Will add some a unit test where some sample scenarios are given and see they pick the results that make sense
Reviewers: yhchiang, dhruba, haobo, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18741
